ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Sexual and gender diverse individuals (SGDI) report higher usage of methamphetamine in sexual contexts. They face difficulties making sense of their experiences and being heard in services. Peer researchers (individuals with lived experience) were involved in a participatory study on methamphetamine consumption. OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe the opportunities and challenges of involving peer researchers in all stages of the research process; 2) To discuss how this involvement could address the epistemic injustice experienced by SGDI who practice chemsex. METHODOLOGY: The peer-researcher participatory process was documented through a journal and meeting notes, which were analyzed through the framework of epistemic injustice. This notion refers to the mechanisms that prevent the knowledge of a person or group from being heard and considered legitimate. RESULTS: The contribution of peer researchers was highly valued and raised questions. Their in-depth knowledge facilitated data analysis and guided knowledge dissemination, promoting the transformation of current services. Their presence also helped to establish relationships of trust with the study population. DISCUSSION: This connection with the study population can create expectations for services that may require a significant level of involvement from researchers. The team’s commitment to improving services can generate a mistaken perception of a lack of objectivity.
