Time to hospital admission and start of treatment in patients with ischemic stroke in northern Italy and predictors of delay.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early treatment (i.e. thrombolysis) is crucial for a successful care of ischemic stroke. In the management of stroke, two phases are crucial: the pre-hospital and the in-hospital interval. This work investigated factors influencing pre- and in-hospital delay in a large geographic area of Northern Italy. METHODS: Enrolled were patients presenting with ischemic stroke in four administrative districts of Northern Italy (Como, Lecco, Sondrio and Varese) over a 4-month period. Pre-hospital time and in-hospital time with single management steps were recorded prospectively. Age, gender, recruiting hospital, EMS transport and triage codes, clinical severity and thrombolytic treatment were also recorded. Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors predicting pre- and in-hospital delay were performed. RESULTS: Median pre-hospital time and in-hospital time were, respectively, 120 min (interquartile range, IQR 62-271) and 150 min (IQR 80-214). Pre-hospital time was halved in patients hospitalized via EMS (p<0.001) and clinically more severe (p<0.001). At multivariate analysis, transport code was associated with delay at any time (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: EMS use and transport code predicted treatment delay in patients with ischemic stroke. A more intensive use of EMS and high urgency codes could help increase the number of stroke patients treated appropriately.

Symptomatic or prophylactic treatment of weekend migraine: an open-label, nonrandomized, comparison study of frovatriptan versus naproxen sodium versus no therapy.

BACKGROUND: Migraine often occurs during weekends. The efficacy of frovatriptan, naproxen sodium, or no therapy for the acute or prophylactic treatment of weekend migraineurs was tested in an open-label, nonrandomized pilot study. METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects (mean age 36 ± 12 years, including 18 females) suffering from migraine without aura were followed up for six consecutive weekends. No treatment was administered during the first two weekends. On the third and fourth weekends, patients were given frovatriptan 2.5 mg and on the fifth and sixth weekends naproxen sodium 500 mg. Treatment was taken on Saturday and Sunday morning, regardless of the occurrence of migraine. Efficacy was evaluated through a diary, where patients reported the severity of migraine on a scale from 0 (no migraine) to 10 (severe migraine) and use of rescue medication. RESULTS: The migraine severity score was significantly lower with frovatriptan (4.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-5.9]) than with naproxen sodium (5.7 [CI 5.1-6.4], P< 0.05 versus frovatriptan) or no therapy (6.6 [6.2-7.0], P< 0.01 versus frovatriptan). The difference in favor of frovatriptan was more striking in patients not taking rescue medication (frovatriptan, 1.9 [1.5-2.3]) versus naproxen sodium 3.6 [3.0-4.2], P< 0.001) and versus no therapy (5.1 [4.4-5.8], P< 0.001) and on the second day of treatment. The rate of use of rescue medication was significantly (P< 0.05) lower on frovatriptan (12.5%) than on naproxen sodium (31.3%) or no therapy (56.3%). CONCLUSION: This pilot study provides the first evidence of the efficacy of a second-generation triptan as symptomatic or prophylactic treatment for weekend migraine.