Apalutamide and overall survival in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the SPARTAN study, compared with placebo, apalutamide added to ongoing androgen deprivation therapy significantly prolonged metastasis-free survival (MFS) and time to symptomatic progression in patients with high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Overall survival (OS) results at the first interim analysis (IA1) were immature, with 104 of 427 (24%) events required for planned final OS analysis. Here, we report the results of a second pre-specified interim analysis (IA2). METHODS: One thousand two hundred and seven patients with nmCRPC were randomized 2 : 1 to apalutamide (240 mg daily) or placebo. The primary end point of the study was MFS. Subsequent therapy for metastatic CRPC was permitted. When the primary end point was met, the study was unblinded. Patients receiving placebo who had not yet developed metastases were offered open-label apalutamide. At IA2, pre-specified analysis of OS was undertaken, using a group-sequential testing procedure with O'Brien-Fleming-type alpha spending function. Safety and second progression-free survival (PFS2) were assessed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 41 months. With 285 (67% of required) OS events, apalutamide was associated with an improved OS compared with placebo (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.59-0.96; P = 0.0197), although the P-value did not cross the pre-specified O'Brien-Fleming boundary of 0.0121. Apalutamide improved PFS2 (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.45-0.68). At IA2, 69% of placebo-treated and 40% of apalutamide-treated patients had received subsequent life-prolonging therapy for metastatic CRPC. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: In patients with nmCRPC, apalutamide was associated with a 25% reduction in risk of death compared with placebo. This OS benefit was observed despite crossover of placebo-treated patients and higher rates of subsequent life-prolonging therapy for the placebo group.

Abiraterone acetate, exemestane or the combination in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Androgen receptor (AR) signaling and incomplete inhibition of estrogen signaling may contribute to metastatic breast cancer (MBC) resistance to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI; letrozole or anastrozole). We assessed whether combined inhibition of androgen biosynthesis with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone and estradiol synthesis with exemestane (E) may be of clinical benefit to postmenopausal patients with NSAI-pretreated estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 297) were stratified by the number of prior therapies for metastatic disease (0-1 versus 2) and by prior NSAI use (adjuvant versus metastatic), and randomized (1 : 1 : 1) to receive oral once daily 1000 mg abiraterone acetate plus 5 mg prednisone (AA) versus AA with 25 mg E (AAE) versus 25 mg E alone (E). Each treatment arm was well balanced with regard to the proportion of patients with AR-positive breast cancer. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, clinical benefit rate, duration of response, and overall response rate. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in PFS with AA versus E (3.7 versus 3.7 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-1.60; P = 0.437) or AAE versus E (4.5 versus 3.7 months; HR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.70-1.32; P = 0.794). Increased serum progesterone concentrations were observed in both arms receiving AA, but not with E. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events associated with AA, including hypokalemia and hypertension, were less common in patients in the E (2.0% and 2.9%, respectively) and AA arms (3.4% and 1.1%, respectively) than in the AAE arm (5.8% for both). CONCLUSIONS: Adding AA to E in NSAI-pretreated ER+ MBC patients did not improve PFS compared with treatment with E. An AA-induced progesterone increase may have contributed to this lack of clinical activity. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT01381874.

Phase II study of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 in patients with sensitive relapse small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: R115777 (tipifarnib, Zarnestra) is a farnesyl transferase inhibitor that blocks the farnesylation of proteins involved in signal transduction pathways critical for cell proliferation and survival. This multicenter phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of R115777 in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had a partial or complete response to their initial chemotherapy regimen, followed by at least 3 months off treatment before relapse (sensitive relapse) were eligible. R115777 was administered in 3-week cycles at a dose of 400 mg orally twice daily for 14 consecutive days followed by 7 days off treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled. The median progression-free survival was 1.4 months and median overall survival was 6.8 months. Non-hematological toxicities were predominantly grade 1-2 and included nausea (64%) and fatigue (60%). Grade 3-4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 27% and 23% of patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia was not observed. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated peak plasma concentrations of R115777 2.6-4.5 h after oral dosing and no significant drug accumulation. The trial was terminated because no objective responses were observed in 20 patients evaluable for response. CONCLUSIONS: R115777 showed no significant antitumor activity as a single agent in sensitive-relapse SCLC.

Phase II study of R115777, a farnesyl transferase inhibitor, in myelodysplastic syndrome.

PURPOSE: To perform a phase II study of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 (Zarnestra; Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Raritan, NJ) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), using doses recommended in a phase I study in relapsed/refractory leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with MDS were treated with R115777 at doses of 600 mg orally (PO) bid in cycles of 4 weeks of therapy followed by a 2-week rest period. Dose reduction rules for toxicity were applied. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the 28 patients treated were assessable. Three patients responded (complete remission, n = 2; partial remission, n = 1). Responders included two patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts and one patient with refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation. Two of the responders had a diploid karyotype and one had multiple cytogenetic abnormalities including monosomy 5 and 7. The starting dose of 600 mg PO bid resulted in side effects (myelosuppression, fatigue, neurotoxicity, rash, or leg pain) necessitating dose reduction (n = 4) or discontinuation of therapy (n = 7) in 11 (41%) of 27 patients during the induction period (12 weeks). Lower doses of 300 mg PO bid were well tolerated. All responses occurred in patients who had been reduced to this dose level during the initial two cycles. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that R115777 has modest activity in MDS patients, but that, in this patient population, 4 weeks of daily doses of 600 mg PO bid is not tolerated. Further exploration of the optimal dose/schedule and correlation with biologic end points are warranted.

Early clinical experience with liarozole (Liazal) in patients with progressive prostate cancer.

Liarozole (Liazal) is the first retinoic acid (RA) metabolism blocking agent (RAMBA) in clinical practice. RAMBA therapy promotes differentiation and inhibits proliferation by increasing endogenous RA in tumours. Liarozole was investigated in two open-label pilot studies of 100 patients with progressive prostate cancer in relapse despite previous androgen ablation. Liarozole (150-300 mg twice daily, for > or = 1 month) produced > or = 50% reduction in prostate specific antigen (PSA) serum levels in 15 of 30 evaluable patients in study 1 (50%) and 10 of 55 patients in study 2 (18%). PSA responders had more marked reductions in prostatic acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase and symptom scores for bone pain and urological symptoms, and improved general well being. Plasma levels of adrenal androgens did not alter during chronic treatment with liarozole nor at adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test. Liarozole did not alter plasma levels of adrenal androgens or cortisol. Cortisol response to ACTH stimulation was slightly blunted. Liarozole was generally well tolerated. Dermatological adverse events were probably related to increased intracellular RA. Liarozole appears to be a promising treatment option in prostate cancer.

Liarozole--a novel treatment approach for advanced prostate cancer: results of a large randomized trial versus cyproterone acetate. Liarozole Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of oral liarozole, the first retinoic acid metabolism-blocking agent (RAMBA) to be developed as differentiation therapy for human solid tumors, with that of cyproterone acetate (CPA), an antiandrogen for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Liarozole promotes differentiation of cancer cells by increasing the intratumoral levels of retinoic acid. METHODS: A total of 321 patients with metastatic prostate cancer in relapse after first-line endocrine therapy entered a Phase III international multicenter study (recruitment from February 1992 to August 1994) comparing liarozole (300 mg two times daily) with CPA (100 mg two times daily). RESULTS: Accounting for differences in baseline prognostic factors, the adjusted hazard ratio for survival was 0.74 in favor of liarozole (P = 0.039), indicating a 26% lower risk of death than in patients treated with CPA. Median crude (unadjusted) survival time was the same in the liarozole group as in the CPA group (10.3 months). More patients showed a PSA response (at least 50% reduction in PSA from baseline) when treated with liarozole (20%) than with CPA (4%) (P < 0.001). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responders had a median survival benefit of 10 months over nonresponders, irrespective of treatment (hazard ratio 0.43; P = 0.0018). PSA response was apparent within 3 months in approximately 90% of patients who responded. Pain improved more in the liarozole group than in the CPA group (P = 0.03). PSA responders had lower median pain scores than nonresponders (1.7 versus 2.5) and better quality of life (median Functional Living Index-Cancer score 108 versus 98) at end point, ie, treatment discontinuation, as well as throughout the treatment period. Among the most frequently occurring adverse events in the liarozole group were dry skin (51% of patients), pruritus (25%), rash (16%), nail disorders (16%), and hair loss (15%). These adverse events were generally mild to moderate in severity and did not affect the overall quality of life score. There were no detectable effects of either treatment on vital signs such as blood pressure, heart rate, electrocardiogram, and body weight. CONCLUSIONS: Liarozole is superior to CPA in terms of PSA response, PSA progression, and survival, and is capable of maintaining patients' quality of life. The observed adverse events were mild to moderate in nature. These results show that liarozole is a possible treatment option after first-line endocrine therapy has failed.

Liarozole (R75251) in hormone-resistant prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Liarozole is an imidazole derivative that has been identified as an inhibitor of the cytochrome P450-dependent all-trans retinoid acid (RA) breakdown. RA is one of the principal endogenous compounds that controls growth and differentiation of epithelial tissues in mammals. METHODS: Fifty-five patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer in progression, following at least first-line androgen ablation therapy, were evaluated. Thirty-one patients were treated with liarozole 300 mg b.i.d., while 24 patients started with 150 mg b.i.d., which was increased to 300 mg b.i.d. after 4 or 8 weeks. Two patients were not evaluable because they withdrew after initial consent. The WHO performance status was 0 (n = 18), 1 (n = 22), 2 (n = 17), and 3 (n = 6). Most patients (80%) used analgesics. RESULTS: For 11 out of the 53 patients, treatment lasted less than 1 month (they were therefore not evaluable for response) due to: poor compliance (n = 1); early death (n = 3); side-effects (n = 2); and decline of physical condition and continuous progression (n = 4). One patient refused to report for follow-up. In all responders, except one, the dose was increased to 300 mg b.i.d. In 23 of the 42 patients evaluable for response, the pain score improved. In 5 patients the pain score had reduced from 2 or 3 to 0. In 11 out of the 42 patients there was a 1-point improvement of WHO performance status. The prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) response rate was 41%; 15 out of 42 evaluable patients presented a decrease of > or = 50%, whereas PSA normalized in 2 further patients. Most of the side effects mimicked retinoid acid toxicity: cutaneous manifestations (such as dry skin, dry lips, sticky skin, brittle nails, erythema, or itch). All patients experienced one or more of these side effects. Other side effects include nausea, fatigue, and slight alopecia. CONCLUSIONS: Liarozole can be an enrichment of the therapeutic armamentarium for treatment of hormone-resistant prostate cancer patients after first-line androgen ablation therapy without serious toxicity.

Anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid gland treated by radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: A retrospective review was performed to investigate the potential role of external beam radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy in anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-one patients with a histologically or cytologically proven anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, treated by external beam radiation therapy between January 1970 and December 1986 in the Dr. Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center are the subject of this report. The overall survival, local control rate and pattern of metastasis were analyzed. RESULTS: It was found that the impact of lung metastases and local relapse on survival was appreciable. Patients with metastases but locally free of tumor achieved a median survival of 7.5 months. In patients with local regional residual disease after therapy, an actuarial risk of death of 100% at 8 months and a median survival of 1.6 months was observed. For patients without disease at the end of radiation therapy, an actuarial median survival of 8 months was observed. CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis supports the data from the literature that local control is indispensable for achieving a higher short-term survival rate, whereas even with local regional control patients might still die soon after the completion of their treatment because of distant metastases, predominantly in the lungs. A potentially new way of treatment, that is the combination of low dose Adriamycin with hyperfractionated external beam radiation therapy to the primary tumor and prophylactic irradiation to the lung, in order to obtain higher locoregional control and diminishing of distant metastases is briefly discussed.

Urethral metastases of a prostate cancer. A case report.

A patient presented with local pain and voiding difficulties due to a bulky prostatic cancer and diffuse metastatic lesions throughout the pars spongiosa of the urethra. This rare event prompted us to review the literature. Lacking a specific palliative therapy, we developed a technique of intraurethral brachytherapy. With this treatment, we were able to reach a life-lasting palliation.

Accuracy of patient positioning in mantle field irradiation.

A prospective study of the accuracy of patient positioning in mantle field irradiation was carried out in 13 lymphoma patients treated with curative radiotherapy. Patients were treated in the supine and prone position for anterior and posterior fields, respectively. Individually shaped divergent shielding blocks were placed in a fixed position in a template which was positioned on a tray above the patient. A total number of 94 megavoltage portal films (MV) was analysed and compared to 26 simulation films (SIM). MV-SIM differences were larger for posterior fields than for anterior fields. Regarding the position of the lung shielding blocks, mean MV-SIM differences ranged from 1.3 to 4.4 mm and errors exceeding 1 cm were found in 7.2% of cases. Most discrepancies appeared to be randomly distributed. A 4-5 mm systematic cranial shift of patients in the posterior treatment position was noted. Discrepancies in the position of the laryngeal block, spinal cord shielding block and humerus blocks were small with mean MV-SIM differences ranging from 0.3 to 2.7 mm. Differences between simulation set-up and treatment set-up were modest as compared to error rates reported in the literature. Shielding of tumour-bearing areas did not occur. It was concluded that the present standardised technique of patient positioning and the design of treatment fields results in acceptable error rates. Attention should be directed towards increasing the stability of patients in the prone treatment position in order to further reduce both systematic and random error rates.

Brain metastases of endometrial carcinoma. Case report and review of literature.

Distant metastases, and especially brain metastases, are a rare event in the course of a patient with an endometrial carcinoma. The case of Mrs. L. v. O., who died 22 months after primary treatment, of a histologically proven central nervous system metastasis, prompted us to review our material as well as the literature. We found in our data on 2,293 patients treated between 1965 and 1988 only four patients with histologically proven brain metastases whereas another seven presented with manifest clinical signs of central nervous system involvement. These eleven patients constitute 0.48% of our material; the incidence reported in general is with 0.8 to 1.4% somewhat higher.

Accuracy in radiation field alignment in head and neck cancer: a prospective study.

A prospective study has been performed to determine the accuracy of radiation field alignment for a group of 22 patients with tumors in the head and neck. The accuracy was assessed by an analysis of 138 megavolt portal films in comparison to 55 simulation films. The distance (at the patient midplane) between corresponding points at the field edges on verification film and simulation film appeared to be 5 mm on the average and the standard deviation 5 mm. The analysis was extended by translational and rotational matching of the fields in order to separate each error in a translation error of the field with respect to the patient and an error in field size or shape. Translation errors appear to be somewhat larger than field size or shape errors. From an analysis of a series of megavolt films taken every third radiotherapy session, it was concluded that treatment-to-treatment variations are as large as the errors due to the transition from simulation to treatment situation. Further analysis showed that variation of the patient's position within the cast is clearly one of the error sources.