ABSTRACT
A normatização, ética e jurídica, da reprodução humana assistida no Brasil faz-se por meio de poucos instrumentos, sobretudo pela Resolução do Conselho Federal de Medicina n. 2013, de 16 de abril de 2013, que veio revogar a regulação de 2010 e reconhecer a possibilidade de casais homoafetivos se utilizarem das técnicas. Muitas são as discussões levantadas por essa regulação, inclusive quanto às consequências jurídicas da reprodução assistida realizada após a morte de um dos pais. Sobre essa situação específica cita-se um julgado, em que o pai falecido não havia permitido expressamente o uso de seu sêmen para depois da morte (AU)
The regulatory, ethical and legal, of assisted human reproduction occurs in Brazil for a few instruments, especially the Resolution of the Federal Council of Medicine n. 2013, April 16, 2013, which revoked the Resolution 1957/2010 and recognized the possibility of homosexual couples when using the techniques. The discussions raised by this regulation are many, including as to the legal consequences of assisted reproduction made after the death of a parent. Concerning this specific situation, there was a trial in which the deceased father had not expressly permitted the use of their semen after his death (AU)
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Reproductive Rights/ethics , Bioethical Issues , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Maternal Age , Confidentiality/ethics , Embryo Disposition/ethics , Tissue Donors/ethics , Insemination, Artificial, Heterologous/ethicsABSTRACT
Beginning with the assumption that the heated tension between research freedom and the protection of human life and integrity has not been overcome, this article discusses the issue of regulatory framework for the protection of research integrity in the Brazilian legal system. Throughout the work, the general aspects and principles that establish the limits between scientific activity and the rights and interests of the subjects of experimental processes are developed, as well as the treatment deserved by certain especially problematic situations derived from the complex cultural composition of Brazilian society.
Subject(s)
Ethics, Research , Policy Making , Brazil , HumansABSTRACT
The Brazilian Law on Biosafety was approved on March 2005. Subsequently, in May of this same year, the Attorney General of the Republic filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutional grounds of article 5 of the aforementioned Law. This article allows the use of embryonic stem cells in research and therapies obtained from surplus human embryos from techniques of in vitro fertilisations.
