Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for TNM stage III colon cancer: results of a prospective multicenter study in Italy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is still debate about the practicality of performing laparoscopic colectomy instead of open colectomy for patients with curable cancer, although laparoscopic surgery is now being performed even for patients with advanced colon cancer. We compared the long-term results of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for TNM stage III carcinoma of the colon in a large series of patients followed up for at least 3 years. METHODS: The subjects of this prospective non-randomized multicentric study were 290 consecutive patients, who underwent open surgery (OS group; n = 164) or laparoscopic surgery (LS group; n = 126) between 1994 and 2005, at one of the four surgical centers. The same surgical techniques were used for the laparoscopic and open approaches to right and left colectomy. The distribution of TNM substages (III A, III B, IIIC) as well as the grading of carcinomas (G1, G2, G3) were similar in each arm of the study. The median follow-up periods were 76.9 and 58.0 months after OS and LS, respectively. RESULTS: There were 10 (6.1 %) versus 9 (7.1 %) deaths unrelated to cancer, 15 (9.1 %) versus 5 (4 %) cases of local recurrence, 7 (4.2 %) versus 5 (4 %) cases of peritoneal carcinosis, and 37 (22.5 %) versus 14 (11.1 %) cases of metastases in the OS and LS groups, respectively. There was also one case of port-site recurrence after LS (0.8 %). The OS group had a significantly higher probability of local recurrence and metastases (p < 0.001) with a significant higher probability of cancer-related death (p = 0.001) than the LS group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support that LS is safe and effective for advanced carcinoma of the colon. Although the LS group in this study had a significantly better long-term outcome than the OS group, further investigations are needed to draw a definitive conclusion.

Treatment of rectal adenomas by transanal endoscopic microsurgery: 15 years' experience.

BACKGROUND: The authors present their experience with rectal adenomas managed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). The goals of this study were to examine our institution's experience by evaluating surgical morbidity, mortality, and local recurrence rate. METHODS: This retrospective study investigated 402 patients who underwent TEM a for preoperative diagnosis of adenoma from January 1993 to October 2008. The mean age was 65 years (range = 22-92 years). All patients were regularly followed up to determine treatment efficacy in terms of local recurrence rate. RESULTS: No 30-day perioperative mortality occurred. No conversion to laparoscopic or open procedures was reported. Minor complications occurred in 28 (7%) patients, whereas major complications were found only in 2 (0.5%) patients. Definitive histology confirmed adenomas in 366 cases (91%). At a mean follow-up of 84 months (range = 1-190 months), 16 (4%) adenomas recurred and were successfully retreated by TEM [14 cases (87.5%)] and by conventional surgery [2 patients (12.5%)]. No further recurrences were observed at subsequent follow-up. CONCLUSION: The findings warrant the conclusion that TEM is a safe, effective treatment for rectal adenomas where endoscopic removal is not applicable and has low morbidity and no mortality.

Use of the electrothermal bipolar vessel system (EBVS) in laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Since laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has been adopted as the gold standard for the treatment of adrenal diseases, the development of technology for vascular control and dissection manoeuvres, amongst other things, may play a pivotal role in its further improvement. We report our experience with the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) device for LA. METHODS: From January 2004 to January 2006, 50 patients (pts) undergoing LA were selected and randomized for use of the EBVS (25 pts, group A) versus the UltraSonic Shears (USS) device (25 pts, group B). Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), previous surgery and associated diseases were similar between the two groups. The main surgical parameters collected for each patient (pt) concerned operative time, major and minor complications, conversion rate, blood loss, hospital stay and histology. RESULTS: There was no mortality in either group. The right adrenalectomy mean operative time (OpT) was 51.8 mins (range 40-90 mins) and 68.6 mins (range 50-130 mins) in group A and B, respectively (P not significant). The left adrenalectomy mean OpT was 72.2 mins (range 55-100 mins) and 94 mins (range 65-140 mins) for group A and B, respectively (P < 0.05). The mean blood loss was 83 ml (group A) and 210 ml (group B) (p < 0.05). Complications were not different for the two groups. The mean hospital stay was 2.9 and 3.1 days in group A and B, respectively (P not significant). CONCLUSIONS: EBVS in LA may provide a significantly short operating time and blood loss.

Early rectal cancer: definition and management.

BACKGROUND: Local excision of rectal cancer is an alternative to radical resection but today its role surrounding the management of patients with early stage rectal cancer (T1-T2-N0) represents an important surgical issue. AIM: To analyze the results of 135 patients with early stage low rectal cancer treated with local excision by transanal endoscopic microsurgery and in the case of T2 also by neoadjuvant therapy. STUDY DESIGN: 135 patients with T1-T2-N0-M0 rectal cancer were enrolled in the study. Staging according to the definitive histological findings was as follows: pT0 in 24 patients (17.8%), pT1 in 66 patients (48.8%) and pT2 in 45 patients (33.4%). RESULTS: Minor complications were observed in 12 patients (8.8%) whereas major complications were seen only in 2 patients (1.5%). At a median follow-up of 78 (36-125) months, local recurrences occurred in 4 patients and distal metastasis in 2 patients (all patients were staged preoperatively T2). Disease-free survival rates in T1 and T2 patients were 100 and 93% respectively at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to local recurrence and survival rate, the long-term results of early stage rectal cancer in patients treated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery were similar to those reported in the literature after conventional surgery (total mesorectal excision).

Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Many devices are available for vascular control during laparoscopic colorectal procedures. Ultrasonic coagulating shears (UCS), vascular staplers, titanium or plastic clips, and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) are currently used according to the surgeon's preference. This study aimed to compare EBVS Ligasure with UCS. METHODS: We report the outcome of 200 consecutive unselected patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resections of which 100 were performed with EBVS Ligasure (from September 2004 to December 2005, group 1) and 100 with UCS harmonic scalpel (from December 2002 to June 2004, group 2). Only the following three types of operation were performed: right colectomy (RC), left colectomy (LC), and low anterior resections (LAR). Emergency procedures have been excluded. The same attending surgical teams performed or supervised all procedures. Operating time, blood loss, complications, and postoperative hospital stay were investigated. RESULTS: Age, gender, previous surgical abdominal procedures, and ASA risk were similar between the two groups, as well as was the percentage of malignant cases (74% vs. 71%, respectively). There were 32 vs. 37 RC, 50 vs. 47 LC, and 18 vs. 16 LAR in groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was no mortality in either group. A conversion to open surgery and two major complications occurred in group 2. There were no statistically significant differences in mean operating time (111 vs. 133, 140 vs. 176, and 153 vs. 201 min) and in the mean postoperative hospital stay (5.2 vs. 6.1, 6.5 vs. 7.1, and 6.8 vs 7.3 days) for RC, LC, and LAR between group 1 and 2, respectively. We do report interesting data about statistically significant differences in the blood loss: 115 vs. 370, 150 vs. 455, and 185 vs. 495 ml for RC (p < 0.001), LC (p < 0.001), and LAR (p = 0.002) between group 1 and group 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our laparoscopic colorectal experience, EBVS Ligasure has proven safe and effective in vessel sealing. Patients in whom this device was used had less blood loss and slight advantages in operating time and postoperative hospital stay.

Laparoscopic anterior adrenalectomy for the treatment of adrenal metastases.

Aim of this study was to evaluate the results in 6 patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy for the treatment of solitary adrenal gland metastases. One hundred forty-five patients underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy by transperitoneal anterior approach. In 6 patients the indication was the presence of a solitary adrenal gland metastasis. Primary tumors were the following: truncal melanoma, gastric cancer, renal cancer, lung cancer, and breast cancer. Mean age was 57 years (range 44-70 years). Three patients underwent right adrenalectomy and 3 patients a left adrenalectomy. No conversion to open surgery occurred. No mortality or intraoperative complications were observed. Mean operative time was 103 minutes (range 70-150) for right adrenalectomy and 170 minutes (range 90-280) for left adrenalectomy. No postoperative complications occurred. Mean diameter of the tumor was 3.5 cm (range 2-5 cm). Tumor free margins were obtained in every case. Mean hospital stay was 2 days (range 2-3 days). At follow-up, 2 patients have died of systemic dissemination of the disease, one 15 months and one 24 months after the operation. The remaining 4 patients are alive and disease free at a mean follow-up of 7 months (range 4-11 months). So far, no port site metastases or local recurrence have been observed. In our experience adrenal gland metastasis can be treated safely and effectively by the laparoscopic transperitoneal anterior approach.

Results of laparoscopic versus open resections for non-early rectal cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of four years.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic rectal resection for malignancy is still debated. Concern has been expressed regarding the lack of significant data from larger patient series with longer periods of follow-up. The aims of this study were to compare long-term outcome with a minimum follow-up of four years in unselected patients undergoing either laparoscopic rectal resection or open rectal resection for cancer. METHODOLOGY: From May 1992 to August 1997 all electively admitted patients with rectal cancer were included in a prospective non-randomized study. Written information was submitted to each patient and the location in each group (laparoscopic or open) was related to the patient's choice. The inclusion protocol criteria excluded T1 tumors. All 68 T2-T4 patients underwent preoperative radiotherapy (5.040 cGy), completed with chemotherapy in selected cases (patients below 70 years of age). Long-term results were compared between the two groups. Follow-up time of both groups ranged between 48 and 96 months (mean, 49.4 months). RESULTS: Excluding patients who underwent a palliative resection or conversion to open surgery and deaths not related to cancer, 53 pts (29 laparoscopic rectal resection, 24 open rectal resection) out of 68 are available and are the object of this study. No patient was lost to follow-up. No wound recurrence was observed. The local recurrence rate after laparoscopic rectal resection was 24.1% vs. 25% after open rectal resection (P = 0.799). Distant metastases occurred in 20.7% of patients in the LLR group (laparoscopic rectal resection) vs. 25% in the ORR group (open rectal resection) (P = 0.980). Cumulative survival probability after laparoscopic rectal resection and open rectal resection was 0.690 and 0.625 (P = 0.492), respectively. Cumulative survival probability for Duke's stage A, B and C in the LRR group vs. the ORR group was 1.000 vs. 0.900 (P = 0.585), 0.667 vs. 0.636 (P = 0.496) and 0.429 vs. 0.445 (P = 0.501), respectively. Sixteen laparoscopic rectal resection patients (55.2%) and 12 open rectal resection patients (50%) are presently disease free (P = 0.979). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer were comparable to those after conventional resection, with a trend in favor of the laparoscopic approach that does not reach a statistically significant difference, possibly due to the limited size of the sample.