Perforating veins: an anatomical approach to arteriovenous fistula performance in the forearm.

OBJECTIVES: Arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) play a key role for people who rely on chronic haemodialysis. Stenosis in the venous outflow of the AVF will cause an alternative route of the subcutaneous blood flow via the deeper venous pathways by means of side branches and the perforating veins (PVs). The purpose for the present study was to define the number and anatomical localisation of the perforating veins in the forearm. METHODS: Twenty forearms were dissected to study the venous anatomy. The localisation, size and connections of the perforators were recorded and stored digitally. RESULTS: In total, 189 PVs were defined (mean, 9.5 per arm; range, 6-19), with 60 (32%) PVs connected to the cephalic vein, 97 (51%) connections to the basilic vein and 32 (17%) PVs to the median vein of the forearm. Most PVs originate from the basilic vein and connect with the ulnar venae comitans. The cephalic vein connects equally to the radial venae comitans, interossea veins and the muscles. CONCLUSION: The cephalic vein has the fewest PVs and almost a third of them connect to the muscles. This is probably important for the maturation of the AVF, the superficial flow volume and the accessibility for puncture.

Multi-slice computed tomographic angiography for stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas.

PURPOSE: A method of diagnosing the extent and severity of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenoses is multislice computed tomographic angiography (MS-CTA). The aim of this prospective study was to assess the accuracy of MS-CTA for the detection and grading of stenoses in AVF in comparison to digital subtraction angiography (DSA), which was used as the gold standard of reference. METHODS: Fifteen hemodialysis (HD) patients with dysfunctioning forearm AVF were included. These AVFs were evaluated by both DSA and MS-CTA and were read in a prospective, blinded manner by two radiologists experienced in vascular imaging. RESULTS: ROC analysis revealed areas under the curve of 0.90+/-0.07 for observer I and 0.87+/-0.08 for observer II at a stenosis cut-off level of >or=50% diameter reduction. The combined results for MS-CTA showed sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 82%, 98%, 82% and 98% for stenoses>or=50% and 71%, 99%, 77% and 98% for stenoses>or=75%. Inter-observer agreement for the detection of stenoses>or=50% diameter reduction was 0.70 and 1.0, for MS-CTA and DSA, respectively. CONCLUSION: MS-CTA can provide good visualization of forearm HD access AVF and has moderate sensitivity, but high specificity for the detection of flow-limiting stenoses.

Hand assisted laparoscopic surgery of aortoiliac occlusive disease: initial results.

OBJECTIVES: Open aortobifemoral bypass grafting has been the procedure of choice for many years in patients with symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Hand assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for AIOD could have advantages like faster recovery, faster oral intake and shorter hospital stay compared to the conventional technique. We documented the results of patients who underwent HALS for AIOD in our hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: from January 1999 to December 2002, 33 consecutive patients underwent HALS for AIOD. Peri- and postoperative results were prospectively registered. Three different laparoscopic approaches were applied: transperitoneal, retroperitoneal and apron approach. RESULTS: There were 23 males and 10 females, with a mean age of 59 years (range 39-85). The surgical technique applied was: transperitoneal: 22 patients, retroperitoneal: 7 patients, apron: 4 patients. Per-operative results (median) of the transperitoneal, retroperitoneal and apron approach are: operating time 240, 420 and 263 minutes, cross clamp time 32.5, 40 and 33.5 minutes, blood loss 1150, 2100 and 950 ml, respectively. Postoperatively oral intake was fully resumed in 3, 4.5 and 2 days after performing the transperitoneal, retroperitoneal and apron technique. During the ICU stay patients received artificial respiration for 0, 1 and 0 days, admission to the ICU was 0.5, 1 and 0.75 days for the transperitoneal, retroperitoneal and apron approach. Finally, hospital stay was 8, 12.5 and 7 days after the transperitoneal, retroperitoneal and apron approach. Four patients (12%) had a minor complication, 4 patients (12%) had a major complication; pneumonia with ARDS, sepsis, bypass occlusion and chylo-abdomen. No patients died. CONCLUSIONS: HALS for AIOD is a technically demanding operation with a long learning curve. All three approaches are feasible. In this series of patients, we feel the transperitoneal and apron approach have the most advantages because of the larger working space. Finally, randomized trials will determine if laparoscopic assisted or total laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery has the potential to reduce morbidity for the patient compared to the conventional technique.

Autogenous radial-cephalic or prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop AVF in patients with compromised vessels? A randomized, multicenter study of the patency of primary hemodialysis access.

OBJECTIVE: The construction of an autogenous radial-cephalic direct wrist arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) is the primary and best option for vascular access for hemodialysis. However, 10%-24% of RCAVFs thrombose directly after operation or do not function adequately due to failure of maturation. In case of poor arterial and/or poor venous vessels for anastomosis, the outcome of RCAVFs may be worse and an alternative vascular access is probably indicated. A prosthetic graft implant may be a second best option. Therefore, a randomized multicenter study comparing RCAVF with prosthetic (polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE]) graft implantation in patients with poor vessels was performed. METHODS: A total of 383 consecutive new patients needing primary vascular access were screened for enrollment in a prospective randomized study. According to defined vessel criteria from the preoperative duplex scanning, 140 patients were allocated to primary placement of an RCAVF and 61 patients to primary prosthetic graft implantation. The remaining 182 patients were randomized to receive either an RCAVF (n = 92) or prosthetic graft implant (n = 90). Patency rate was defined as the percentage of AVFs that functioned well after implantation. RESULTS: Primary and assisted primary 1-year patencies were 33% +/- 5.3% vs 44% +/- 6.2% (P = .03) and 48% +/- 5.5% vs 63% +/- 5.9% (P = .035) for the RCAVF and prosthetic AVF, respectively. Secondary patencies were 52% +/- 5.5% vs 79% +/- 5.1% (P = .0001) for the RCAVF and prosthetic AVF, respectively. Patients with RCAVFs developed a total of 102 (1.19/patient-year [py]) vs 122 (1.45/py; P = .739) complications in the prosthetic AVFs. A total of 43 (0.50/py) interventions in the RCAVF group and 79 (0.94/py) in the prosthetic graft group were needed for access salvage (P = .077). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were more interventions needed for access salvage in the patients with prosthetic graft implants, we may conclude that patients with poor forearm vessels do benefit from implantation of a prosthetic graft for vascular access.