Ankyloglossia in newborns: incidence and breastfeeding follow-up at 1 and 6 months.

BACKGROUND: Ankyloglossia is an anatomical variation of the lingual frenulum that negatively interferes with the functionality of the tongue. This condition can affect breastfeeding negatively. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of ankyloglossia among healthy babies born in Siena Hospital and the correlation between ankyloglossia and breastfeeding difficulties. METHODS: We performed an observational prospective study conducted on healthy and breastfed newborns born in Siena Hospital in the period between January and June 2022. The evaluation of lingual frenulum in the first few days of life was performed by Martinelli's Lingual Frenulum Protocol with scores for Infants (MLFPI), while the clinical assessment of breastfeeding initiation was performed by the Breastfeeding Observation and Evaluation Form according to WHO-UNICEF guidelines. We also compared the reliability in predicting breastfeeding of a tool that measured the features of the tongue frenulum: the Bristol Tongue Assessment Tool (BTT). Breastfeeding at one and six months of babies' age was assessed by telephone interview, and information among children's nutrition, weight growth and difficulties found in breastfeeding was also collected. This study was approved by the Pediatric Ethics Committee for Clinical Trials of the Tuscany Region. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety infants were included in the study; 21 (11.05%) had a MLFPI score ≥13. Data at one month of age showed a statistically higher MLFPI score (P value <0.001) in babies with breastfeeding difficulties (median score 13.0, IQR 5.5-14), than in those without (median score 5.0, IQR 2.0-7.5). Data at 6 months of age showed a similar difference in babies with and without breastfeeding difficulties (median 12.0, IQR 4.0-14.0 vs. 5.0, IQR 2.0-8.0 respectively). A MLFPI score ≥13 is positively associated with breastfeeding difficulties at 1 and 6 months. Also, the BTT was positively a risk factor for problems in breastfeeding at 1 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: A high MLFPI score is a risk factor of breastfeeding difficulties. In these cases, a referral to experienced personnel is advisable: they can provide the emotional and professional support to the mother-child dyad, and/or refer for surgical evaluation and frenotomy. In our cohort, the usefulness of either MLFPI score or BTT was evident in predicting breastfeeding difficulties; the rate of surgical removal of the frenulum was nonetheless low.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is a strong predictor of tumor recurrence in early colon cancers: A propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation and immune response play a crucial role in tumor growth, and the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may be a simple way to assess the host inflammatory response. The NLR has been shown to be a prognostic indicator in many human tumors; in early colon cancers, it has been evaluated only in a few studies and its role remains controversial. METHODS: We analyzed data from 503 colon cancer patients. The best cutoff value for NLR was defined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We grouped 276 Dukes A/B colon cancers, not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, into low (<2.36) and high (>2.36) NLR and subjected to further analyses related to disease-free survival (DFS). A propensity score-matched analysis and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to avoid confounding bias. RESULTS: The NLR correlated with tumor stage and oncologic outcome. The best NLR cutoff value was identical in the whole cohort and in Dukes A/B patients. Low NLR patients had a significantly better DFS rate than high NLR patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27; P = .0001); along with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels and Dukes B stage, high NLR was an independent prognostic factor of worse prognosis (HR, 2.86; P = .0033). Even in Dukes A patients, NLR discriminated between relapsing and nonrelapsing patients. Propensity score and IPTW analyses confirmed such results, thus excluding possible misinterpretation. CONCLUSION: Preoperative NLR, an inexpensive and readily available biomarker, can predict tumor relapse and should be assessed for implementation of tailored therapy in early stage colon cancer.

Modified versus standard D2 lymphadenectomy in total gastrectomy for nonjunctional gastric carcinoma with lymph node metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Although D2 lymphadenectomy has been shown to improve outcomes in gastric cancer, it may increase postoperative morbidity, mainly owing to splenopancreatic complications. In addition, the effects of nodal dissection along the proper hepatic artery have not been extensively elucidated. We hypothesized that modified D2 (ie, D1+) lymphadenectomy may decrease surgical risks without impairing oncologic adequacy. METHODS: Patients with node-positive gastric cancer undergoing curative total gastrectomy were intraoperatively randomized to D1+ (group 1, 36 patients) or standard D2 lymphadenectomy (group 2, 37 patients), the latter including splenectomy and nodal group 12a. The index of estimated benefit was used to assess the efficacy of dissection of each nodal station. The primary endpoint for oncologic adequacy was the disease-free survival (DFS) rate. RESULTS: Surgical complications were significantly more common in group 2, which also included 2 postoperative deaths. Overall, 35 patients (49%) experienced tumor recurrence. The primary site of tumor relapse and the 5-year DFS rate were not different between the 2 groups. Involvement of the second nodal level was associated with a worse DFS rate; however, patients undergoing more extensive lymphadenectomy did not show a better DFS rate. The incidence of involvement of nodal stations 10, 11d, and 12a was 5%, and the 5-year DFS rate was zero. Consequently, the benefit to dissect such lymph nodes was null. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that modified D2 lymphadenectomy confers the same oncologic adequacy as standard D2 lymphadenectomy, with a significant reduction of postoperative morbidity.