Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 13(11): e0206433, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30383803

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Impairments in the ability to understand others and the self in terms of internal mental states (reflective functioning [RF] or mentalizing) are thought to play a key role in the development of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The first aim of this study was to validate the Italian version of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ), a brief self-report measure of RF, by examining its factor structure with Principal Component Analyses (PCA), and correlations with constructs that should be theoretically related to RF. In addition, we investigated whether the RFQ could empirically distinguish between healthy controls and carefully diagnosed BPD patients using Research Operating Curve methods, and was related to severity of borderline pathology as measured with the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP), an observer-rated measure of BPD pathology. METHODS: An Italian translation of the RFQ was administered to a sample of 154 healthy controls and a clinical sample of 59 BPD patients diagnosed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II disorders. Clinical severity of BPD was assessed with the SWAP. Normal controls completed self-report inventories of constructs related to RF (mindfulness, empathy, Theory of Mind, alexithymia, and autistic traits). RESULTS: PCA confirmed the a priori factor structure in the Italian translation of the RFQ, showing two subscales that measure certainty and uncertainty about mental states, with satisfactory reliability and construct validity. These dimensions also distinguished BPD patients from healthy controls (p < 0.05). ROC analyses showed that the uncertainty subscale discriminated BPD patients from healthy individuals (area under the curve = 78%, cut of 4.5 points, sensitivity = 73%, specificity = 68%). Within the patient group, regression analyses showed uncertainty about mental states to have a significant unique contribution in predicting BPD severity (p < 0.05), explaining 12% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Results largely supported the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the RFQ. These findings also provide further evidence for the role of impairments in mentalizing and reinforce the rationale for offering mentalization-based interventions to individuals with this disorder.


Subject(s)
Borderline Personality Disorder/diagnosis , Mentalization/physiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Thinking/physiology , Translating , Adolescent , Adult , Borderline Personality Disorder/pathology , Borderline Personality Disorder/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Italy , Language , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Self Report , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Theory of Mind/physiology , Young Adult
2.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 10: 582, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27994543

ABSTRACT

The borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by a severe pattern of instability in emotional regulation, interpersonal relationships, identity and impulse control. These functions are related to the prefrontal cortex (PFC), and since PFC shows a rich anatomical connectivity with the cerebellum, the functionality of the cerebellar-PFC axis may impact on BPD. In this study, we investigated the potential involvement of cerebello-thalamo-cortical connections in impulsive reactions through a pre/post stimulation design. BPD patients (n = 8) and healthy controls (HC; n = 9) performed an Affective Go/No-Go task (AGN) assessing information processing biases for positive and negative stimuli before and after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS; 1 Hz/10 min, 80% resting motor threshold (RMT) over the left lateral cerebellum. The AGN task consisted of four blocks requiring associative capacities of increasing complexity. BPD patients performed significantly worse than the HC, especially when cognitive demands were high (third and fourth block), but their performance approached that of HC after rTMS (rTMS was almost ineffective in HC). The more evident effect of rTMS in complex associative tasks might have occurred since the cerebellum is deeply involved in integration and coordination of different stimuli. We hypothesize that in BPD patients, cerebello-thalamo-cortical communication is altered, resulting in emotional dysregulation and disturbed impulse control. The rTMS over the left cerebellum might have interfered with existing functional connections exerting a facilitating effect on PFC control.

3.
Behav Med ; 39(2): 25-8, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23668908

ABSTRACT

The objective of the present study was to test the association between Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and the cathecolamine-O-methyl-transferase (COMT) low-activity (Met158) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). In this case-control study, DNA was obtained from venous blood of 19 BPD patients and 36 healthy subjects. COMT-Val158Met single-nucleotide polymorphism was genotyped by predesigned SNP assay. The COMT Met158 allele was over-represented in patients with BPD in comparison to normal subjects (68.4% vs 44.4%, respectively; Fisher exact test, p = .02). In terms of genotype, the Met158Met subjects were more frequent in patients versus controls (47.4% vs 22.2%, respectively), whereas the high-activity genotype Val158Val was under-represented (10.5% vs 33.3%, respectively). The allele encoding for the COMT with low enzymatic efficiency was found to be over-represented in BPD, possibly resulting in excessive synaptic dopaminergic activity and ultimately affecting externalizing behaviours, such as impulsivity and aggressiveness.


Subject(s)
Alleles , Borderline Personality Disorder/genetics , Catechol O-Methyltransferase/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Adult , Aggression/physiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Gene Frequency , Genetic Association Studies , Genotype , Humans , Italy , Male , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
4.
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol ; 34(2): 68-74, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23706024

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Decision-making during prenatal diagnosis has not been extensively studied. We aimed to determine psychological correlates and level of decisional conflict following prenatal diagnosis. METHOD: A total of 159 pregnant women were consecutively enrolled. All participants completed three questionnaires (the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, the Berlin Social Support scales and the Decisional Conflict scale) at three time points (T1 - waiting period between prenatal testing and disclosure of the results; T2 - decision phase within 3 days from test result disclosure; T3 - digestion period within 3 weeks from disclosure). RESULTS: Women with fetal anomaly who terminate pregnancy were significantly more anxious and depressed than controls at each time point. Additionally, women with a normal fetus who terminate pregnancy presented higher level of anxiety and depression compared with controls at T2. Women who terminated pregnancy showed increased uncertainty scores at T2 and T3. Anxious and depressed individuals at T2 (decision period) were more uncertain about their choice at T3 compared to women with normal levels of anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: The decision to terminate pregnancy, irrespective of test results, may determine emotional distress and psychiatric morbidity. Women who were anxious and depressed at decision appeared to be more uncertain about their choices as time passed by. A careful assessment of women during prenatal diagnosis should be useful to identify women who may benefit from psychological support.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Pregnant Women/psychology , Prenatal Diagnosis/psychology , Abortion, Induced , Adult , Anxiety/psychology , Conflict, Psychological , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
6.
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis ; 3(1): 29-43, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19124389

ABSTRACT

Some antidepressant agents can cause electrophysiological changes of cardiac function leading to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. However, antidepressants have also protective effects on the heart through their capacity to modulate cardiac autonomic-mediated physiological responses. Heart rate variability and QTc length are two strictly linked parameters that allow us to appreciate the effects of different drugs on cardiac physiology. Heart rate variability reflects functioning of the autonomic nervous system and possibly also regulation by the limbic system. Autonomic regulation of cardiac activity influences also cardiac repolarization and QT length, both directly and via its effects on heart rate. In this review we present the methodologies adopted to study the effect of antidepressant drugs on QT length and heart rate variability and we summarize data on electrophysiological changes related to antidepressant treatment. Clinical implications for the choice of different antidepressants in different clinical populations are discussed.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Depression/drug therapy , Heart Diseases/complications , Heart Rate/drug effects , Action Potentials , Animals , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/prevention & control , Autonomic Nervous System/drug effects , Autonomic Nervous System/physiopathology , Depression/complications , Depression/physiopathology , Electrocardiography , Heart Diseases/drug therapy , Heart Diseases/physiopathology , Humans , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...