Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nutrients ; 14(17)2022 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36079851

ABSTRACT

Background: Berberine is a natural alkaloid with hypoglycemic properties. However, its therapeutic use is limited by a very low oral bioavailability. Here we developed a new oral formulation of berberine based on Sucrosomial® technology and tested its effect on insulin resistance. Methods: Sucrosomial® berberine was first tested in vitro in the hepatoma cell line Huh7 to assess its effect on proteins involved in glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance. The pharmacokinetics and efficacy on insulin resistance were then studied in C57BL/6 mice fed with standard (SD) and high-fat diet (HFD) for 16 weeks and treated daily during the last 8 weeks with oral gavage of Sucrosomial® berberine or berberine. Results: Sucrosomial® berberine did not affect Huh7 cell viability at concentrations up to 40 µM. Incubation of Huh7 with 20 µM of Sucrosomial® and control berberine induced glucokinase (GK) and the phosphorylation of 5'-adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK), both known targets for the control of insulin resistance. In vivo, we observed an 8-fold higher plasma concentration after 3 weeks of oral administration of 50 mg/kg/day of Sucrosomial® formulation compared to berberine. HFD, compared to SD, induced insulin resistance in mice as determined by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The treatment with a 6.25 mg/kg/daily dose of Sucrosomial® berberine significantly reduced the area under the curve (AUC) of OGTT (73,103 ± 8645 vs. 58,830 ± 5597 mg/dL × min), while control berberine produced the same effects at 50 mg/Kg/day (51518 ± 1984 mg/dL × min). Under these conditions, the two formulations resulted in similar berberine plasma concentration in mice. Nevertheless, a different tissue distribution of metabolites was observed with a significant accumulation of reduced, demethylated and glucuronide berberine in the brain after the oral administration of the Sucrosomial® form. Glucuronide berberine plasma concentration was higher with Sucrosomial® berberine compared to normal berberine. Finally, we observed similar increases of AMPK phosphorylation in the liver in response to the treatment with Sucrosomial® berberine and berberine. Conclusions: The Sucrosomial® formulation is an innovative and effective technology to improve berberine gastrointestinal (GI) absorption with proven in vitro and in vivo activity on insulin resistance.


Subject(s)
Berberine , Insulin Resistance , AMP-Activated Protein Kinases/metabolism , Animals , Berberine/pharmacology , Berberine/therapeutic use , Glucuronides , Insulin/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL
2.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 44(5): 1245-1252, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28455212

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of two doses of tramadol during isoflurane anaesthesia in sheep and their ability to prevent the cardiovascular response induced by surgical stimulation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled study. ANIMALS: A total of 12 healthy sheep (mean weight, 47.5±7.9 kg) undergoing lumbar transpedicular intervertebral disk nucleotomy. METHODS: Sheep were sedated with medetomidine, anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane at 1.5 vol.%. Baseline heart rate and blood pressure were measured and sheep were randomly assigned an intravenous injection of tramadol (4 or 6 mg kg-1). Fentanyl was injected as rescue analgesic if cardiovascular parameters were increased more than 20% compared to baseline. If those variables were below 20% of baseline, the concentration of isoflurane was gradually decreased until parameters returned to the original value. Blood collections were performed at pre-assigned times, and concentrations of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol (M1) assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Time from premedication to anaesthesia induction, anaesthesia time, propofol dose and intraoperative body temperature were similar between doses. Cardiovascular variables remained between ±20% of baseline value, and no statistical difference was observed between treatments. Regardless of the dose of tramadol administered, arterial blood pressure was statistically higher than baseline 10 minutes after tramadol administration, but it gradually returned to previous values. A two-compartment model and a non-compartment model described the pharmacokinetics of tramadol and M1, respectively. Plasma concentrations of tramadol rapidly decreased in the first 2 hours for both doses with an elimination half-life of more than 40 minutes. The M1 maximum concentration was similar for both doses, and it was detected in plasma after 35 minutes. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both doses of tramadol provided adequate cardiovascular stability during spinal surgery in sheep. The pharmacokinetic variables may be used to plan the dosage regime during general anaesthesia.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Cardiovascular System/drug effects , Diskectomy/veterinary , Sheep/surgery , Tramadol/pharmacology , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacokinetics , Anesthesia, General/veterinary , Animals , Diskectomy/methods , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Intraoperative Period , Tramadol/administration & dosage , Tramadol/pharmacokinetics
3.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 762: 350-6, 2015 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26048311

ABSTRACT

Combination therapy with two or more analgesics is widely used for conditions associated with moderate to severe pain. Combinations of diverse analgesics with different modes of action can improve the risk-benefit ratio of analgesic treatments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the antinociceptive effect of tapentadol (TAP) and flupirtine (FLP), when administered separately or in combination, as well as their synergistic interaction in the orofacial formalin test in rats. After i.p. injection of TAP at different doses (2, 5, 10 and 15mg/kg), the biphasic nociceptive behavior was reduced in a dose-dependent manner in both phase I and II. Conversely, i.p. injection of FLP at different doses (0.6, 1.6, 3.3, 6.6, 16.6 and 22.2mg/kg) induced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in phase II only. TAP was found to be more effective than FLP. The interaction between TAP and FLP was synergistic in phase II with an interaction index (γ) of 0.50±0.24. The data reported in this study indicate that FLP enhances the antinociceptive effect of TAP and this drug combination might be potentially useful in the treatment of chronic pain.


Subject(s)
Aminopyridines/pharmacology , Analgesics/pharmacology , Facial Pain/chemically induced , Facial Pain/drug therapy , Formaldehyde/pharmacology , Phenols/pharmacology , Aminopyridines/therapeutic use , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Synergism , Facial Pain/physiopathology , Male , Nociception/drug effects , Phenols/therapeutic use , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Tapentadol
4.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 42(6): 629-37, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25494625

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Flupirtine (FLU) is a non-opioid analgesic with no antipyretic or anti-inflammatory effects which is used in the treatment of pain in humans. There is a substantial body of evidence on the efficacy of FLU in humans but this is inadequate for the recommendation of its off-label use in veterinary clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of FLU after intravenous (IV), oral immediate release (POIR), oral prolonged release (POPR) and rectal (RC) administrations in healthy dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Four-treatment, single-dose, four-phase, unpaired, cross-over design (4×4 Latin-square). ANIMALS: Six adult Labrador dogs. METHODS: Animals in groups 1, 2 and 4 received a single dose of 5 mg kg(-1) FLU administered by IV, POIR and RC routes. Group 3 received a single dose of 200 mg subject(-1) via the POPR route. The wash-out periods were 1 week. Blood samples (1 mL) were collected at assigned times for 48 hours and plasma FLU concentrations were analysed by a validated HPLC method. RESULTS: Adverse effects including salivation, tremors and vomiting were noted in the IV group and resolved spontaneously within 10 minutes. These effects did not occur in the other groups. The FLU plasma concentrations were detectable in all of the treatment groups for 36 hours following administration. The pharmacokinetic profiles after extravascular administrations showed similar trends. The bioavailability values after POIR, POPR and RC were 41.93%, 36.78% and 29.43%, respectively. There were no significant differences in pharmacokinetic profiles between the POIR and POPR formulations. A 5 mg kg(-1) POIR dose or a 200 mg subject(-1) POPR dose gave plasma concentrations similar to those reported in humans after clinical dosing. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides pharmacokinetic data that can be used to design further studies to investigate FLU in dogs.


Subject(s)
Aminopyridines/pharmacokinetics , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Administration, Rectal , Aminopyridines/administration & dosage , Aminopyridines/blood , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/blood , Animals , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dogs , Female , Injections, Intravenous/veterinary , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...