Ventricular Arrhythmias in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease, Part I: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Patients with congenital heart disease associated with a higher risk for ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) can be divided conceptually into those with discrete mechanisms for reentrant monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) (Group A) and those with more diffuse substrates (Group B). Part I of this review addresses Group A lesions, which predominantly consist of tetralogy of Fallot and related variants. Well-defined anatomic isthmuses for reentrant monomorphic VT are interposed between surgical scars and the pulmonary or tricuspid annulus. The most commonly implicated critical isthmus for VT is the conal septum that divides subpulmonary from subaortic outlets. Programmed ventricular stimulation can be helpful in risk stratification. Although catheter ablation is not generally considered an alternative to the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for prevention of SCD, emerging data suggest that there is a subset of carefully selected patients who may not require ICDs after successful monomorphic VT ablation.

Ventricular Arrhythmias in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease, Part II: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

There are marked variations in the incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and in the substrates for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) across the gamut of congenital heart defects. In this 2-part review, patients with higher-risk forms of congenital heart disease (CHD) were conceptually categorized into those with discrete anatomic isthmuses for macro-reentrant ventricular tachycardia (VT) (Group A) and those with more diffuse or less well-defined substrates (Group B) that include patchy or extensive myocardial fibrosis. The latter category encompasses CHD lesions such as Ebstein anomaly, transposition of the great arteries with a systemic right ventricle (RV), and congenital aortic stenosis. For Group B patients, polymorphic VT and ventricular fibrillation account for a higher proportion of VA. The prognostic value of programmed ventricular stimulation is less well established, and catheter ablation plays a less prominent role. As cardiomyopathies evolve over time, pathophysiological mechanisms for VA among Groups A and B become increasingly blurred.