Automated indirect immunofluorescence antinuclear antibody analysis is a standardized alternative for visual microscope interpretation.

BACKGROUND: Screening for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is a basic tool in the serological work-up of systemic rheumatic disorders. Despite the emergence of alternative screening methods and the difficulties in standardization, indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) remains the recommended method for ANA detection. This study aimed to assess the reliability of automated ANA IIF analysis as a standardized alternative for the conventional manual approach. METHODS: ANA testing on HEp-2000 cells was performed on 304 consecutive routine sera, 28 serumbank samples displaying rare staining patterns, 219 samples of well-defined disease cohorts [141 systemic sclerosis (SSc), 13 polymyalgia rheumatica, 22 osteoarthritis, 5 ANCA-associated vasculitis and 38 spondyloarthritis] and 100 healthy donors. All samples were analyzed by automated IIF (Zenit G-sight), by conventional visual IIF microscopy and two ANA screening enzyme immunoassays (EIA). RESULTS: Automated and conventional ANA IIF analysis were comparable for negative/positive interpretation as well as intensity assessment (>90% agreement). In contrast, the accuracy of pattern recognition (26%) was limited. Likelihood ratios (LR) for SSc on results intervals of both Zenit G-sight and EIA increased with increasing level of positivity. Sensitivity within the SSc-associated antibody subsets was higher for Zenit G-sight (97%-100%) than EIA (10%-96%). A significant correlation between the quantitative result obtained by Zenit G-sight and the conventional end-point titer was found. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Zenit G-sight for automated ANA IIF analysis offers opportunities to improve standardization. However, a complementary role of the expert technicians remains, especially for pattern recognition and classification of uncertain/negative samples.

Eradication of Propionibacterium acnes biofilms by plant extracts and putative identification of icariin, resveratrol and salidroside as active compounds.

Propionibacterium acnes is a Gram-positive bacterium that plays an important role in the pathogenesis of acne vulgaris. This organism is capable of biofilm formation and the decreased antimicrobial susceptibility of biofilm-associated cells may hamper efficient treatment. In addition, the prolonged use of systemic antibiotic therapy is likely to lead to the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance. In the present study we investigated whether P. acnes biofilms could be eradicated by plant extracts or their active compounds, and whether other mechanisms besides killing of biofilm cells could be involved. Out of 119 plant extracts investigated, we identified five with potent antibiofilm activity against P. acnes (extracts from Epimedium brevicornum, Malus pumila, Polygonum cuspidatum, Rhodiola crenulata and Dolichos lablab). We subsequently identified icariin, resveratrol and salidroside as active compounds in three of these extracts. Extracts from E. brevicornum and P. cuspidatum, as well as their active compounds (icariin and resveratrol, respectively) showed marked antibiofilm activity when used in subinhibitory concentrations, indicating that killing of microbial cells is not their only mode of action.

Human complement factor 3 polymorphism determination by capillary electrophoresis of serum.

Variability of complement factor 3 (C3) mobility in serum protein electrophoresis was investigated. We found that the migration time of C3 can be reproducibly determined (beween-run CV=0.76%) using clinical capillary electrophoresis (CE) equipment (the Capillarys™ 2 system, Sebia). Moreover, we found a significant difference (p<0.001) in migration times of the major C3 phenotypes FF (fast-fast), FS (fast-slow) and SS (slow-slow). Glycosylation did not significantly affect test results. This is the first report on the migration time of C3 phenotypes on a clinical CE instrument. The presented method allows faster data than agarose-electrophoresis or genotyping. Moreover, reference ranges for serum C3 concentration depend on C3 phenotype, which allows a better tailored clinical interpretation of C3 concentrations.