[Emmert's plastic surgery]. / Emmert-Plastik.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the surgical intervention is the elimination of infections, ulceration and pain caused by ingrown nails (unguis incarnatus). INDICATIONS: A surgical intervention is recommended for ingrown nails (the large toenail is most frequently affected) in stage III and higher (according to the Mozena classification) as well as in cases of nail plate defects and recurrences. CONTRAINDICATIONS: In cases where a disturbance of wound healing is expected and general contraindications for surgery. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The surgical approach incorporates a half-moon-shaped skin incision and a straight longitudinal nail incision. Both incisions extend to the bone. A wedge-shaped piece of tissue is removed and after thorough curettage and rinsing the wound is closed using transungual single-button sutures. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Regular changes of wound dressing, relief of the affected ray by immobilization during wound healing. An antibiotic therapy is only indicated in selected cases. RESULTS: Between 1 January 2013 and 1 January 2023 a total of 50 Emmert's plastic surgery operations (15 women and 35 men) were performed at the Klinikum Vest, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Recklinghausen. The average age of the patients was 50.6 years. The mean follow-up time was 63 months. The outcome and satisfaction of the patients were evaluated according to the self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS). The total point count (median value) of the evaluated SEFAS score was 44.

Short-term Results of Transit Bipartition to Promote Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Objective: To evaluate (1) the efficacy of transit bipartition (TB) as revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG); (2) the impact of the length of the common channel (CC) on weight loss. Background: LSG in combination with TB has been shown to be highly efficacious for treating morbid obesity. The role of TB as RBS to address the problem of primary failure or weight recidivism after LSG is less well defined. Methods: Observational study of outcomes in 100 morbidly obese patients who received a TB following LSG. Follow-up examinations (FE) were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Variables analyzed included BMI, percent excess weight loss (%EWL), total body weight loss (%TBWL), effect on obesity-related conditions and complications. Results: The mean BMI before LSG was 49.9 ± 8.5 kg/m2. A nadir of 32.7 ± 6.1 kg/m2 was reached 22.1 ± 16.9 months after LSG (%EWL 70.0 ± 14.5). The time interval between LSG and TB was 52.2 ± 26.6 months at which the BMI had increased to 37.6 ± 7.1 kg/m2 and %EWL decreased to 49.4 ± 19.7. Following TB, the BMI decreased continuously to 31.4 ± 5.7 kg/m2 after 12 months with a parallel increase in %EWL to 74.7 ± 20.3 and %TWL reaching 36.3 ± 10.5. Weight loss was significantly higher for CC length of 250 versus 300 cm after 12 months (BMI 29.4 ± 5.3/33 ± 5.3 kg/m2, P = 0.002; %EWL 79.8 ± 26.6/70.4 ± 17; P = 0.009). Improvement of comorbidities was observed in a high proportion of patients. Major early complications occurred in 3% of the patients. Conclusion: TB is an effective second-step procedure to address insufficient weight loss or weight recidivism after LSG. CC length of 250 versus 300 cm had a significant impact. While most improvements of obesity-related comorbidities are likely linked to weight loss, amelioration of GERD is largely mediated by accelerated gastric emptying. Major complications were observed in 3% of patients and managed without fatalities.

Short- to medium-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass compared with one-anastomosis gastric bypass for weight recidivism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) and the one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are 2 revisional procedures to address the problem of weight recidivism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of SADI and OAGB as revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) in initially super-obese patients (body mass index [BMI] >50 kg/m2). SETTING: Academic hospital, bariatric center of excellence, Germany. METHODS: Observational study of outcomes in 84 initially super-obese patients who had undergone RBS after LSG (SADI n = 42, OAGB n = 42) between July 2013 and April 2018. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after RBS. The variables analyzed included time between LSG and RBS, BMI, excess weight loss, total weight loss, operation time, and complications. RESULTS: The time interval between LSG and RBS was 45.5 ± 22.8 and 43.5 ± 24.2 months for SADI and OAGB, respectively. At the time of RBS, the mean BMI was 42.8 ± 7.9 kg/m2 for SADI and 43.4 ± 9.2 kg/m2 for OAGB. The follow-up examinations rates (%) after SADI were 97.6, 92.8, 90.5, 78.6, 57.1, and 100, 97.6, 95.2, 85.7, and 59.5 after OAGB. The BMI at the follow-up examinations were 39.1 ± 7.2, 34.2 ± 6.9, 31.2 ± 5.8, 30.2 ± 5.3, 29.3 ± 5.1 for SADI, and 39.5 ± 8.1, 36.6 ± 7.4, 34.7 ± 7.9, 32.9 ± 6.3, and 31.6 ± 5.9 for OAGB. The mean operating times for SADI and OAGB were 138 ± 40 and 123 ± 39 minutes, respectively. Three patients in the SADI group and 1 patient in the OAGB group developed a major complication within the first 30 postoperative days. CONCLUSION: SADI and OAGB were effective second-step procedures for further weight reduction after LSG in initially super-obese patients after short to medium follow-up. There was a trend toward higher weight loss for SADI though this did not reach statistical significance. Substantial differences concerning surgery time and complications between the 2 procedures were not observed.