Potential of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF-Endoret) to Enhance the Efficacy of Assisted Reproductive Techniques in Refractory Cases.

AIM: Nowadays, infertility problems affect a high percentage of couples. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF-Endoret, hereafter PRGF) as a promising coadjuvant therapy in assisted reproductive techniques and its possible role in implantation and pregnancy rates. This retrospective study included 36 PRGF cycles in 27 women with one of the following reproductive disorders: recurrent implantation failure (n = 16), repeated abortion (n = 8), and thin endometrium (n = 3). METHODS: PRGF was obtained from each patient and administered as three consecutive intrauterine instillations. The endometrial thickness was measured after each PRGF infusion and a good-quality embryo transfer was performed for every patient. Endometrial thickness, biochemical pregnancy, and miscarriage rate were the primary measured outcomes. RESULTS: PRGF increased the endometrial growth respecting the initial thickness in all cases. The biochemical pregnancy rate determined as positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) was 59%, considering the total number of patients; the ongoing pregnancy percentage was 48%. PRGF application day was relevant with a significant probability of achieving pregnancy (p < 0.01) when the first PRGF infusion was carried out beyond 6.5 days after the first day of the woman's cycle and the second one beyond 9.5 days of the menstrual cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Intrauterine autologous PRGF infusion is a safe, easily accessible, and inexpensive therapy that could collaborate in fertility treatments by optimizing the endometrium for implantation and thus favoring the crosstalk between the embryo and the uterus improving the embryo-maternal dialogue.

Quality of additional embryos transferred on pregnancy outcomes in IVF: predictions using a mathematical approach.

This study assessed the influence of adding embryos with different embryo quality on pregnancy rate and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR). The study included 1891 IVF transfers performed at two centres with different embryo transfer policies. Pregnancy rate and MPR were analysed following three models and then including embryo quality. A predictive mathematical model and two scatter plots were constructed. The model based on embryo independence was incompatible with the observed data, while both the ground and collaborative models provided excellent fits. The collaborative model, however, predicted multiple pregnancies, especially triplets, more accurately. Transfer of additional embryos, irrespective of embryo quality, always increased pregnancy rate and MPR. When implantation rate was low, there was a marked increase in pregnancy rate but only a relatively small increase in MPR. In contrast, with higher implantation rates, the increase in pregnancy rate was mainly due to the increase in MPR, with the same singleton pregnancy rate. Transfer of additional embryos, irrespective of embryo quality, follows a collaborative pattern and always results in an increase in pregnancy rate and MPR. The scatter plots accurately predicted the influence of the different combinations of number and embryo quality on pregnancy rate and MPR.

Clinical inertia in poorly controlled elderly hypertensive patients: a cross-sectional study in Spanish physicians to ascertain reasons for not intensifying treatment.

BACKGROUND: Clinical inertia, the failure of physicians to initiate or intensify therapy when indicated, is a major problem in the management of hypertension and may be more prevalent in elderly patients. Overcoming clinical inertia requires understanding its causes and evaluating certain factors, particularly those related to physicians. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the rate of clinical inertia and the physician-reported reasons for it. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional, multi-center study was carried out in a primary care setting. We included 512 physicians, with a consecutive sampling of 1,499 hypertensive patients with clinical inertia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical inertia was defined when physicians did not modify treatment despite knowing that the therapeutic target had not been reached. Clinical inertia was considered to be justified (JCI) when physicians provided an explanation for not intensifying treatment and as not justified (nJCI) when no reasons were given. RESULTS: JCI was observed in 30.1 % (95 % CI 27.8-32.4) of patients (n = 451) and nJCI in 69.9 % (95 % CI 67.6-72.2) (n = 1,058). JCI was associated with higher blood pressure (BP) values (both systolic and diastolic) and diabetes (p = 0.012) than nJCI. nJCI was associated with patients having an isolated increase of systolic or diastolic or high borderline BP values or cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSION: Physicians provided reasons for not intensifying treatment in poorly controlled patients in only 30 % of instances. Main reasons for not intensifying treatment were borderline BP values, co-morbidity, suspected white coat effect, or perceived difficulty achieving target. nJCI was associated with high borderline BP values and cardiovascular disease.

Is there a predictive profile for clinical inertia in hypertensive patients? An observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Some studies have described a large number of hypertensive patients who are followed by a primary care physician without achieving adequate blood pressure (BP) control but whose treatment nevertheless is not intensified. It is not known whether physicians are aware of this clinical inertia and what factors are associated with this problem. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the factors associated with clinical inertia in hypertensive patients. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study conducted in a network of primary care centres and hospital hypertension units in Spain. Using a consecutive sampling approach, 512 physicians selected 5077 hypertensive patients in whom they suspected poor BP control after chart review. The main variables documented were BP control and cardiovascular risk according to European Society of Hypertension guidelines, changes in treatment after visit, type of treatment, and healthcare setting. A binomial logistic regression multivariate analysis, adjusted for physician, was performed. RESULTS: Of the selected patients, 70.9% had poor BP control according to measurements taken in the physician's office, and in 1499 (42.1%) of those poorly controlled patients, treatment was not intensified (clinical inertia). Factors associated with clinical inertia were as follows: being seen at a primary care centre (p < 0.001), not having left ventricular hypertrophy (p < 0.001) or microalbuminuria (p < 0.001), taking fixed-dose (p = 0.049) or free-dose (p = 0.001) combination therapy, BP measured in other settings (nurse's office, patient's home) than the physician's office (p = 0.034) or the pharmacy (p = 0.019), older age (p = 0.032), and lower systolic (p < 0.001) and diastolic (p < 0.001) BP. Of the hypertensive patients with clinical inertia, 90.2% (95% CI 88.7, 91.7) had high cardiovascular risk. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical inertia was associated with a profile that included older age, lack of co-morbid conditions and being seen at a primary care centre.

Successful pregnancy and childbirth after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with calcium ionophore oocyte activation in a globozoospermic patient.

OBJECTIVE: To check the effectiveness of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) combined with assisted oocyte activation (AOA) in a globozoospermic patient. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, Valencia, Spain. PATIENT(S): A patient with globozoospermia. INTERVENTION(S): ICSI was administered in 14 oocytes. ICSI combined with AOA, in which a small amount of calcium was injected followed by calcium ionophore exposure, was done in 9 oocytes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fertilization rate and embryo quality was assessed in both groups. RESULT(S): Chemical activation increased fertilization rate (55.6% vs. 35.7%) and the number of embryos with less multinucleation on day 2 (0 vs. 60%). Two embryos generated from AOA were transferred into the uterus (on day 3), resulting in a pregnancy and a healthy newborn. CONCLUSION(S): The AOA with calcium ionophore treatment improved fertilization rate and quality of the embryos, and was found to be an effective method for AOA in this patient with a low fertilization rate after previous ICSI treatment.