Multimodal human motion dataset of 3D anatomical landmarks and pose keypoints.

In this paper, we present a dataset that takes 2D and 3D human pose keypoints estimated from images and relates them to the location of 3D anatomical landmarks. The dataset contains 51,051 poses obtained from 71 persons in A-Pose while performing 7 movements (walking, running, squatting, and four types of jumping). These poses were scanned to build a collection of 3D moving textured meshes with anatomical correspondence. Each mesh in that collection was used to obtain the 3D locations of 53 anatomical landmarks, and 48 images were created using virtual cameras with different perspectives. 2D pose keypoints from those images were obtained using the MediaPipe Human Pose Landmarker, and their corresponding 3D keypoints were calculated by linear triangulation. The dataset consists of a folder for each participant containing two Track Row Column (TRC) files and one JSON file for each movement sequence. One TRC file is used to store the 3D data of the triangulated 3D keypoints while the other contains the 3D anatomical landmarks. The JSON file is used to store the 2D keypoints and the calibration parameters of the virtual cameras. The anthropometric characteristics of the participants are annotated in a single CSV file. These data are intended to be used in developments that require the transformation of existing human pose solutions in computer vision into biomechanical applications or simulations. This dataset can also be used in other applications related to training neural networks for human motion analysis and studying their influence on anthropometric characteristics.

The Reliability and Accuracy of a Fall Risk Assessment Procedure Using Mobile Smartphone Sensors Compared with a Physiological Profile Assessment.

Falls in older people are a major health concern as the leading cause of disability and the second most common cause of accidental death. We developed a rapid fall risk assessment based on a combination of physical performance measurements made with an inertial sensor embedded in a smartphone. This study aimed to evaluate and validate the reliability and accuracy of an easy-to-use smartphone fall risk assessment by comparing it with the Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA) results. Sixty-five participants older than 55 performed a variation of the Timed Up and Go test using smartphone sensors. Balance and gait parameters were calculated, and their reliability was assessed by the (ICC) and compared with the PPAs. Since the PPA allows classification into six levels of fall risk, the data obtained from the smartphone assessment were categorised into six equivalent levels using different parametric and nonparametric classifier models with neural networks. The F1 score and geometric mean of each model were also calculated. All selected parameters showed ICCs around 0.9. The best classifier, in terms of accuracy, was the nonparametric mixed input data model with a 100% success rate in the classification category. In conclusion, fall risk can be reliably assessed using a simple, fast smartphone protocol that allows accurate fall risk classification among older people and can be a useful screening tool in clinical settings.

The detection of malingering in whiplash-related injuries: a targeted literature review of the available strategies.

OBJECTIVE: The present review is intended to provide an up-to-date overview of the strategies available to detect malingered symptoms following whiplash. Whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) represent the most common traffic injuries, having a major impact on economic and healthcare systems worldwide. Heterogeneous symptoms that may arise following whiplash injuries are difficult to objectify and are normally determined based on self-reported complaints. These elements, together with the litigation context, make fraudulent claims particularly likely. Crucially, at present, there is no clear evidence of the instruments available to detect malingered WADs. METHODS: We conducted a targeted literature review of the methodologies adopted to detect malingered WADs. Relevant studies were identified via Medline (PubMed) and Scopus databases published up to September 2020. RESULTS: Twenty-two methodologies are included in the review, grouped into biomechanical techniques, clinical tools applied to forensic settings, and cognitive-based lie detection techniques. Strengths and weaknesses of each methodology are presented, and future directions are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the variety of techniques that have been developed to identify malingering in forensic contexts, the present work highlights the current lack of rigorous methodologies for the assessment of WADs that take into account both the heterogeneous nature of the syndrome and the possibility of malingering. We conclude that it is pivotal to promote awareness about the presence of malingering in whiplash cases and highlight the need for novel, high-quality research in this field, with the potential to contribute to the development of standardised procedures for the evaluation of WADs and the detection of malingering.