Personalizing Heart Failure Care to the Patient With Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current review describes the role of the cardio-oncology nurse and the need for personalized heart failure care for the patient with cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: It is a new role whereby cardiology or heart failure nurses care for patients with cancer who develop cardiotoxicity or cardiovascular diseases, either during the cancer therapy or in a later stage. Inter-disciplinary approach is important for individualized early treatment, shortened interruptions to cancer therapy, and irreversible cardiovascular injury prevention. Nurses have a key role in early evaluation and quality control of the care provided. This is a quite new clinical area and not much evidence exists for the development of clinical guidelines and pathways to support clinicians. More trials are needed for the development of clinical recommendations.

Association between ethnicity and degree of improvement in cardiac function following initiation of sacubitril/valsartan.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the degree of short-term improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), haemodynamics, NT-proBNP and quality of life following initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in black patients when compared with white patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, single-centre, hypothesis-generating study of patients with symptomatic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with guideline recommended therapy, who were transitioned from an ACE inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) to sacubitril/valsartan. RESULTS: Our analysis included 83 patients (mean age 57 years) with echocardiography performed before and after transition from ACE-I/ARB to sacubitril/valsartan, after excluding patients with concomitant Cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation. Overall, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with LVEF improvement from 28.8% ±â€Š0.7 to 32.0% ±â€Š1.1% (P = 0.0002), but no reverse remodelling was observed. The association with LVEF improvement was only observed in white patients (n = 46, P = 0.0006), but not in black patients (n = 37, P = 0.1728), and appeared to be associated with reduced blood pressure (baseline vs. 2-week blood pressure 116.5 ±â€Š13.9 vs. 109.4 ±â€Š14.3 mmHg, respectively, in white patients, P = 0.0449). Fifteen patients (18.1%) became ineligible for primary prevention Implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. CONCLUSION: Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with improved LVEF, NT-proBNP concentrations and quality of life in patients with symptomatic HFrEF on guideline recommended therapy. However, in our cohort, improvement of LVEF and quality of life might be attenuated in black patients, which warrants further investigation.

Biologic Variability of Soluble ST2 in Patients With Stable Chronic Heart Failure and Implications for Monitoring.

Soluble ST2 (sST2) is a novel biomarker implicated in myocardial remodeling and fibrosis. Recent studies in normal subjects have suggested that the biologic variability (BV) of sST2 is significantly lower than that of the B-type natriuretic peptides and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP). It may, consequently, be a better biomarker for monitoring patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). To date, no published studies have examined the BV of sST2 in a heart failure population. Blood samples from 50 outpatients with pharmacologically optimized stable CHF and persistent left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <40%) were collected at baseline, 1 hour, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Using log-transformed data, mean intra-individual coefficients of variation (CVI) and subsequent reference change values were calculated for both NTproBNP and sST2. Results demonstrate significantly lower CVI and reference change values for sST2 compared with NTproBNP at 1 month (12.02 [36%] vs 36.75 [103%]), p <0.001, 3 months (12.23 [36%] vs 40.98 [114%]), p <0.001, and 6 months (16.41 [47%] vs 46.02 [128%]), p <0.001. In conclusion, the BV of sST2 is significantly lower than that of NTproBNP in patients with CHF. These results support previous indications that sST2 may be a better biomarker for monitoring such patients.