Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther ; 16(1): 61-69, 2023 Jan 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36634280

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation remains a serious complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) occurring in approximately 60-70% of CMV-seropositive HCT recipients. CMV reactivation leads to adverse outcomes including end-organ damage, graft-versus-host disease, and graft failure. METHODS: Ganciclovir was administered pretransplant at 5 mg/kg twice daily intravenously from the start of conditioning to Day T-2 to CMV-seropositive patients receiving their first allogeneic HCT. CMV DNA was monitored weekly until at least Day 100 posttransplant. RESULTS: A total of 109 consecutive patients were treated, median age 57 (range 20-73) years. Of these, 36 (33%) patients had a CMV reactivation within the first 105 days posttransplant with a median time of reactivation of 52.5 (range 36-104) days posttransplant. The cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation at Day 105 posttransplant was 33.1% (95% confidence interval: 24.4-42.0). One patient developed CMV disease. CONCLUSION: The use of pretransplant ganciclovir was associated with low incidence of CMV reactivation and disease. These data suggest that pretransplant ganciclovir with preemptive therapy for viral reactivation may be a useful strategy to reduce CMV reactivation. Future prospective trials are needed to compare strategies for CMV prophylaxis.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Ganciclovir/therapeutic use , Cytomegalovirus , Cytomegalovirus Infections/etiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology
2.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 26(3): 680-687, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31500517

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia patients receive anthracycline-containing induction chemotherapy. Anthracyclines cause cardiotoxicity; however, there is a paucity of data reflecting the risk of cardiotoxicity in the acute myeloid leukemia population, and risk factors for development of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction are not well established in this population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of adult acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving anthracycline-containing induction chemotherapy between March 2011 and August 2017 was performed. Baseline and all additional cardiac monitoring within one year of induction were collected. Home medications and new medication initiation were determined via the electronic health record and new outpatient prescriptions. RESULTS: Of 97 evaluable patients, 25 (25.8%) developed reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and 18 (18.6%) experienced clinical heart failure within one year of induction. The median difference from baseline to lowest left ventricular ejection fraction was -5.0 percentage points, with a range of +10.0 to -52.5. The median time to onset of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction was 27 days, at a median cumulative anthracycline dose of 270 mg/m2. No patient-specific or medication-specific factors were significantly associated with the risk of developing reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Of 14 patients started on medical management for reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, 10 (71%) responded to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, we observed that acute myeloid leukemia patients experienced reduced left ventricular ejection fraction more quickly and at lower doses than previously reported in the solid tumor population. Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction was at least partially reversible in most patients started on medical management. Although no factors were significantly associated with decreased cardiomyopathy risk, future assessment of cardioprotective medications may be warranted.


Subject(s)
Anthracyclines/adverse effects , Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Cardiomyopathies/chemically induced , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Cardiotoxicity/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Oncol Pract ; 15(8): e728-e732, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31237807

ABSTRACT

There are no national standards for time between patient arrival and the initiation of scheduled chemotherapy (time to chemotherapy [TTC]). Delays in this process have a negative impact on patient care and the use of health care resources. At the University of Virginia Cancer Center, mean TTC in 2015 was 12.1 hours and mean length of stay (LOS) was 5.45 days at baseline. We formed a multidisciplinary team that participated in ASCO's Quality Training Program. We aimed to improve TTC by 10% over 6 months. We used Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles as quality improvement (QI) models and used XmR charts to evaluate the interventions. The first PDSA cycle involved amending the chemotherapy consent process; mean TTC and LOS improved to 9.3 hours and 4.65 days, respectively. The second PDSA cycle involved shifting pharmacist review of chemotherapy orders to before admission rather than after patient arrival. Mean TTC remained at 9.4 hours (net 22% improvement from baseline) and LOS improved to 4.33 days (net 21% improvement). Our team surpassed the 10% improvement goal for TTC. This QI project faced a few limitations. Our baseline data set was a retrospective cohort review. In addition, oncology patients have a wide range of individual clinical needs that may have an impact on TTC. Delays in TTC have an impact on oncologic care at many medical centers. Our project highlights the need for guidance on this issue. We recommend that other institutions form multidisciplinary teams and also use QI tools to assess delays and implement changes.


Subject(s)
Drug Therapy/methods , Patient Admission/trends , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Inpatients , Length of Stay , Male , Quality Improvement
4.
J Oncol Pract ; : JOP1800307, 2018 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30433844

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:: Twenty percent of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing induction or reinduction chemotherapy at the University of Virginia Health System from May 2011 to August 2014 had a proven or probable invasive fungal infection (IFI). The purpose of our initiative was to reduce the percentage of proven or probable IFIs in patients with AML undergoing induction or reinduction chemotherapy at the University of Virginia Health System to 10% or less by June 2017, in concordance with national averages. METHODS:: A multidisciplinary team was formed to lead the comprehensive quality improvement (QI) initiative. The team generated both current process state and ideal process state workflow diagrams, a cause-and-effect diagram, and a Pareto diagram to determine the most relevant etiology for proven or probable IFIs in patients with AML undergoing induction or reinduction chemotherapy. RESULTS:: Analysis led to the creation of a program standardizing antifungal prophylaxis in this patient population, along with a suggested work-up for recalcitrant fevers. Through two tests of change (Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles 1 and 2), the QI initiative was able to effectively reduce the proven or probable IFI rate to 0% since program implementation in August 2016, thus surpassing both QI initiative goals and national rates of IFI. Mean length of stay (LOS) decreased by 3.4 days, and median intensive care unit LOS decreased by 2 days. CONCLUSION:: Creation of a standardized antifungal prophylaxis program led to a marked decrease in LOS and the proven or probable IFI rate of patients with AML undergoing induction or reinduction chemotherapy.

5.
Support Care Cancer ; 26(12): 4105-4113, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29869294

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to compare the application of three geriatric medication screening tools to the Beers Criteria alone for potentially inappropriate medication quantification and to determine feasibility of a pharmacist-led polypharmacy assessment in a geriatric oncology clinic. METHODS: Adult patients with cancer aged 65 and older underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment. A polypharmacy assessment was completed by a pharmacist and included a review of all drug therapies. Potentially inappropriate medications were screened using the Beers Criteria, Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment/Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions, and the Medication Appropriateness Index. Deprescribing occurred after discussion with the pharmacist, geriatric oncologist, patient, and caregiver. RESULTS: Data were collected for 26 patients. The mean number of medications was 12. The Beers Criteria alone identified 38 potentially inappropriate medications compared to 119 potentially inappropriate medications with the three-tool assessment; a mean of 5 potentially inappropriate medications were identified per patient. After the application of the three-tool assessment, 73% of potentially inappropriate medications identified were deprescribed, resulting in a mean of 3 medications deprescribed per patient. Approximately two thirds of patients reported a reduction in symptoms after the deprescribing intervention. Healthcare expenditures of $4282.27 per patient were potentially avoided as a result of deprescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Our three-tool assessment identified three times more potentially inappropriate medications than the Beers Criteria alone. Pharmacist-led deprescribing interventions are feasible and may lead to improved patient outcomes and cost savings. This three-tool assessment process should be incorporated into interdisciplinary assessments of older patients with cancer and validated in future studies.


Subject(s)
Inappropriate Prescribing/trends , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pharmacists/standards , Polypharmacy , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List/trends , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Deprescriptions , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects
6.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 24(5): 914-922, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29292057

ABSTRACT

Pharmacists are increasingly recognized as an essential member of the multidisciplinary team for hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. However, until recently, their educational background, required training, and potential roles have not been well described. Therefore, the purpose of this manuscript is to provide supporting evidence for the HCT Clinical Pharmacist Role Description, which has been endorsed by several organizations including the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. This document provides justification for the various roles pharmacists fulfill with respect to medication management, transitions of care, patient and provider education, policy development, quality improvement, and research. Furthermore, evidence supporting the value, financially and otherwise, HCT pharmacists provide is reviewed. Pharmacists in the HCT setting are encouraged to report on novel practice models and potential impact of their services to increase awareness and utilization of HCT pharmacists.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Pharmacists/standards , Education, Pharmacy , Humans , Professional Role , United States
7.
Oncologist ; 21(6): 723-30, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27151653

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: : Inappropriate medication use and polypharmacy are extremely common among older adults. Numerous studies have discussed the importance of a comprehensive medication assessment in the general geriatric population. However, only a handful of studies have evaluated inappropriate medication use in the geriatric oncology patient. Almost a dozen medication screening tools exist for the older adult. Each available tool has the potential to improve aspects of the care of older cancer patients, but no single tool has been developed for this population. We extensively reviewed the literature (MEDLINE, PubMed) to evaluate and summarize the most relevant medication screening tools for older patients with cancer. Findings of this review support the use of several screening tools concurrently for the elderly patient with cancer. A deprescribing tool should be developed and included in a comprehensive geriatric oncology assessment. Finally, prospective studies are needed to evaluate such a tool to determine its feasibility and impact in older patients with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The prevalence of polypharmacy increases with advancing age. Older adults are more susceptible to adverse effects of medications. "Prescribing cascades" are common, whereas "deprescribing" remains uncommon; thus, older patients tend to accumulate medications over time. Older patients with cancer are at high risk for adverse drug events, in part because of the complexity and intensity of cancer treatment. Additionally, a cancer diagnosis often alters assessments of life expectancy, clinical status, and competing risk. Screening for polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications could reduce the risk for adverse drug events, enhance quality of life, and reduce health care spending for older cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Geriatric Assessment , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Polypharmacy , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List , Aged , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...