Subject(s)
Appendicitis/complications , Calcinosis/complications , Cecal Diseases/complications , Acute Disease , Appendectomy , Appendicitis/surgery , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Calcinosis/surgery , Cecal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Cecal Diseases/surgery , Humans , Intestinal Perforation , Male , Middle AgedSubject(s)
Anterior Cerebral Artery/injuries , Cerebral Infarction/etiology , Skull Fractures/complications , Adult , Angiography, Digital Subtraction/methods , Anterior Cerebral Artery/surgery , Cerebral Infarction/diagnosis , Cerebral Infarction/surgery , Humans , Male , Sphenoid Bone/injuries , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Owing to parallel advances in health care and an aging population, geriatric injury has become an increasing burden to trauma systems, suggesting that specific clinical pathways may improve the care of this cohort. We created a dedicated Geriatric Trauma Institute, with multidisciplinary support, as a part of our existing trauma program, theorizing that the Geriatric Trauma Institute would promote quality care, reduce the length of stay, and reduce hospital charges. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the prospective database of our level 1 trauma center. Patients aged 65 years or older were identified over 12 months, representing 5 months prior and also after the implementation of the new program. RESULTS: The mean length of stay was reduced for admissions to a nontrauma vs geriatric trauma service (5.64 vs 4.43 days; P = .03), generating a charge reduction of 21.4% in only the first 5 months after program implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings, which require longer-term analysis, suggest that a dedicated geriatric trauma multidisciplinary system promotes quality patient care, improves throughput, and results in significant cost savings via reduced length of stay and concomitant hospital charges.
