Does QBank participation impact in-training examination performance?

BACKGROUND: Performance on the annual in-training examination (ITE) for emergency medicine (EM) residents has been shown to correlate with performance on the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) qualifying examination. As such, significant planning is often committed to ITE preparation, from an individual resident and a residency program perspective. Online specialty-specific question banks (QBanks) represent a popular medium for ITE preparation; however, the impact of QBanks on ITE performance is unclear. We sought to assess the impact of QBank participation on EM resident ITE performance. METHODS: ITE and QBank performance results were collated over 2 academic years, 2019 and 2020, from a 3-year EM residency program. The QBank was provided as a self-study option in 2019 and incorporated as a mandatory component of the curriculum in 2020. ITE raw scores and percentile rank for training level scores were compared with performance on the QBank, including QBank average performance score as well as number of QBank questions completed. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure association between ITE performance and QBank correlates. Additional descriptive demographics, to include gender, PGY level, and USMLE step 1 and 2 scores were also considered. RESULTS: Sixty-two sets (30 residents in 2019, 32 residents in 2020) of ITE performance data and QBank correlates were included. Overall, raw ITE scores and number of QBank questions completed were found to have a significant, positive correlation, (r(60) = 0.34, p < 0.05); correlation was stronger for 2019 (r[28] = 0.39, p < 0.05) compared to 2020 (r[30] =0.25, p = 0.16). Overall, ITE percentile rank for training level scores were also found to have a significant, positive correlation with number of QBank questions completed (r(60) = 0.35, p < 0.05); correlation was again stronger for 2019 (r(28) = 0.42, p < 0.05) compared to 2020 (r(30) = 0.29, p = 0.12). Finally, ITE percentile rank for training level correlated positively with QBank average performance (as a percentage), albeit weakly, and was not found to be significant overall (r[60] = 0.20, p = 0.16); in this instance, 2019 did not show a correlation (r[28] =0.12, p = 0.54); however, 2020 did (r[30] =0.55, p < 0.05). Academic year 2020 raw ITE scores also demonstrated a significant correlation with QBank average performance (r[30] = 0.66, p < 0.0001) while 2019 did not (r[28] = 0.08, p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Participation and engagement in a QBank are associated with improved EM resident performance on the ABEM ITE. Utilization of a QBank may be an effective mode of ITE preparation for EM residents.

Development of an Emergency Department-Based Intervention to Expand Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in a Medicaid Nonexpansion Setting: Protocol for Engagement and Community Collaboration.

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic has disproportionately impacted areas in the Appalachian region of the United States. Characterized by persistent Medicaid nonexpansion, higher poverty rates, and health care access challenges, populations residing in these areas of the United States have experienced higher opioid overdose death rates than those in other parts of the country. Jefferson County, Alabama, located in Southern Appalachia, has been especially affected, with overdose rates over 2 times greater than the statewide average (48.8 vs 19.9 overdoses per 10,000 persons). Emergency departments (EDs) have been recognized as a major health care source for persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). A program to initiate medications for OUD in the ED has been shown to be effective in treatment retention. Likewise, continued patient engagement in a recovery or treatment program after ED discharge has been shown to be efficient for long-term treatment success. OBJECTIVE: This protocol outlines a framework for ED-initiated medications for OUD in a resource-limited region of the United States; the study will be made possible through community partnerships with referral resources for definitive OUD care. METHODS: When a patient presents to the ED with symptoms of opioid withdrawal, nonfatal opioid overdose, or requesting opioid detoxification, clinicians will consider the diagnosis of OUD using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fifth edition) criteria. All patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for moderate to severe OUD will be further engaged and assessed for study eligibility. Recruited subjects will be evaluated for signs and symptoms of withdrawal, treated with buprenorphine-naloxone as appropriate, and given a prescription for take-home induction along with an intranasal naloxone kit. At the time of ED discharge, a peer navigator from a local substance use coordinating center will be engaged to facilitate patient referral to a regional substance abuse coordinating center for longitudinal addiction treatment. RESULTS: This project is currently ongoing; it received funding in February 2019 and was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Alabama at Birmingham in June 2019. Data collection began on July 7, 2019, with a projected end date in February 2022. In total, 79 subjects have been enrolled to date. Results will be published in the summer of 2022. CONCLUSIONS: ED recognition of OUD accompanied by buprenorphine-naloxone induction and referral for subsequent long-term treatment engagement have been shown to be components of an effective strategy for addressing the ongoing opioid crisis. Establishing community and local partnerships, particularly in resource-limited areas, is crucial for the continuity of addiction care and rehabilitation outcomes. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/18734.

Young Man With Suspected Foreign Body Ingestion.

As United States emergency departments (ED) and hospitals continue to contend with increasing numbers of patients presenting with complications of substance abuse, emergency physicians should also be aware of patients who may be smuggling illicit drugs. We report the case of a 26-year-old man who was transported to the ED for suspected drug smuggling. Abdominal computed tomography was notable for the presence of multiple tubular foreign bodies throughout the colon that were later identified as packets containing heroin. Body-packing patients present a high-risk clinical scenario that may result in massive, inadvertent drug exposure.

Risks associated with the use of fluoroquinolones.

Fluoroquinolones are a widely used class of antibiotic that are effective in treating a wide variety of pathogens. Despite their popularity there is increasing concern regarding the potential complications associated with these agents. Patients who take a fluoroquinolone have an increased risk of developing tendinopathy, peripheral neuropathy, and aortic aneurysm or dissection. Providers should consider the risk of these potential complications before using these medications.

Chest pain triage: Current trends in the emergency departments in the United States.

Chest pain is one of the most common complaints in the emergency department (ED). Over the past decade, there has been a significant shift in the approach to patients with chest pain in the ED. With the development of improved cardiac biomarkers, the validation of clinical scoring systems, and an increasing emphasis on shared patient medical decision making, increasing numbers of patients in the ED are being evaluated without requiring admission to the hospital.

Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Does Not Impact Mortality in Acute Ischemic Stroke at Any Time Point up to 6 Months: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Concerns about the harms of intravenous alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) continue to deter physicians from treating patients with acute ischemic stroke with the only drug proven to positively impact outcomes and reduce disability. Recent literature indicates an increase in mortality with alteplase within 7 days, an effect that does not persist from 3 months onwards. The objective of this meta-analysis was to pool mortality estimates from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) at 7 days, 30 days, 90 days, and 6 months after stroke onset. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched through to April 2014, using "hedges" for tissue plasminogen activator, acute ischemic stroke, and placebo. Two independent authors abstracted data and assessed study quality. Data were pooled using Dersimonian and Laird's random effects model. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs (n = 6905) were included in the final analysis. Two authors independently performed study selection and data abstraction. There was no publication bias and total variance attributable to heterogeneity was not significant (I(2) < 50%) at any time point. There was no difference in mortality between alteplase and placebo groups at any time point. Trials that randomized patients beyond 3 h (excluded patients within the 3-h window) did not drive the mortality difference seen at any time point. Exclusion sensitivity analysis revealed that exclusion of the NINDS trial rendered the 7-day difference significant towards increased mortality with alteplase. Quality adjustment did not alter the results. CONCLUSION: Intravenous alteplase did not impact mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke at any of the measured time points up to 6 months (i.e., there was no increase in the risk of death with alteplase). Therefore, intravenous alteplase should be given to all eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke to improve long-term neurologic outcomes. The effects of alteplase on early survival are more complex than previously understood.

Inability of Physicians and Nurses to Predict Patient Satisfaction in the Emergency Department.

INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction is a commonly assessed dimension of emergency department (ED) care quality. The ability of ED clinicians to estimate patient satisfaction is unknown. We sought to evaluate the ability of emergency medicine resident physicians and nurses to predict patient-reported satisfaction with physician and nursing care, pain levels, and understanding of discharge instructions. METHODS: We studied a convenience sample of 100 patients treated at an urban academic ED. Patients rated satisfaction with nursing care, physician care, pain level at time of disposition and understanding of discharge instructions. Resident physicians and nurses estimated responses for each patient. We compared patient, physician and nursing responses using Cohen's kappa, weighting the estimates to account for the ordinal responses. RESULTS: Overall, patients had a high degree of satisfaction with care provided by the nurses and physicians, although this was underestimated by providers. There was poor agreement between physician estimation of patient satisfaction (weighted κ=0.23, standard error: 0.078) and nursing estimates of patient satisfaction (weighted κ=0.11, standard error: 0.043); physician estimation of patient pain (weighted κ=0.43, standard error: 0.082) and nursing estimates (weighted κ=0.39, standard error: 0.081); physician estimates of patient comprehension of discharge instruction (weighted κ=0.19, standard error: 0.082) and nursing estimates (weighted κ=0.13, standard error: 0.078). Providers underestimated pain and patient comprehension of discharge instructions. CONCLUSION: ED providers were not able to predict patient satisfaction with nurse or physician care, pain level, or understanding of discharge instructions.