Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 16(2): e54636, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523982

ABSTRACT

Introduction Over the past 20 years, the number of pregnancy-related fatalities in the United States has been on the rise. Increases in maternal and fetal mortality have been attributed to low socioeconomic status (SES). This raises the question of whether all geographical locations are proportionally affected by this upward trend in pregnancy-related fatalities. San Antonio is one of the largest cities in the United States and is known for its economic segregation. This study aims to compare the maternal and fetal health outcomes of mothers from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds in San Antonio, Texas. Methods To analyze the relationship between pregnancy-related mortality rates and SES in San Antonio, Texas, the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes for maternal and fetal demise and their associated risk factors were identified. The ICD-10 codes were used to compare the health outcomes of pregnant women from the highest SES ZIP Code (78255, median income $124,397) to women from the lowest SES ZIP Code (78207, median income $25,415) using the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File for 2016, which contains information on 93-97% of all hospital discharges in San Antonio, Texas. Results Notably, pregnant women from the high SES ZIP Code were admitted to the hospital from clinics or a physician's office (68.8%), while pregnant women from the low SES ZIP Code were admitted to the hospital from non-healthcare facilities like home or workplace (62.5%). In addition, a greater percentage of patients from the low SES ZIP Code were Black (4.3% vs 1.3%) or Hispanic (88.5% vs 35.1%). Compared to women from the high SES ZIP Code, women from the low SES ZIP Code experienced more fetal deaths and a higher prevalence of maternal and fetal risk factors such as obesity (47.6% vs 32.5%), asthma (1.7% vs 1.3%), hypertension (0.8% vs 0%), substance abuse (0.5% vs 0%), diabetes mellitus (9.8% vs 7.8%), preeclampsia (7.7% vs 2.6%), and multiple C-sections (35.5% vs 28.6%). Finally, fetal mortality rates were higher in the low SES ZIP Code (1.1% vs 0%). Although there were no statistically significant maternal or fetal mortality differences between the ZIP Codes, the trend suggests that women's health outcomes in San Antonio are not equitable. Discussion Analysis reveals disproportionate health outcomes for women in south San Antonio. Further investigation is warranted to better understand the role social and medical factors play in these results. Investigating the relationship between SES and pregnancy-related mortality can help to better inform healthcare providers and identify ways to improve women's health outcomes in San Antonio, Texas.

2.
Nutr Clin Pract ; 32(6): 834-843, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28700266

ABSTRACT

The use of nutrition support outside of institutional settings has contributed to maintaining the health, well-being, and nutrition status of many medically complex children. As these children grow and enter educational settings, there is a need for awareness of the care that these children require for nutrition support therapy. This document is designed to raise awareness to these needs, provide best practice educational resources for those involved in the supervision or provision of nutrition support to children in an educational environment, and promote safe and effective care. Care of children requiring nutrition support is an ongoing and shared partnership among the educational team, medical team, homecare team, and parents/caregivers. Care is individualized to the specific child and may include provision of nutrition support therapy while in the school setting, maintenance of a nutrition access device, and monitoring to safely prevent or act on signs of potential complications. Suggested roles and responsibilities of those involved with nutrition support care are discussed; however, all interventions and routine care must be in accordance with physician's orders, school nurse privileges and competencies, and state and local regulations.


Subject(s)
Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Enteral Nutrition , Parenteral Nutrition , Administration, Intravenous/adverse effects , Caregivers/education , Catheter-Related Infections/diagnosis , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Child , Home Care Services , Humans , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Parents/education , Schools
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...