Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Elife ; 122023 10 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37831064

ABSTRACT

Highly potent animal stem cells either self renew or launch complex differentiation programs, using mechanisms that are only partly understood. Drosophila female germline stem cells (GSCs) perpetuate without change over evolutionary time and generate cystoblast daughters that develop into nurse cells and oocytes. Cystoblasts initiate differentiation by generating a transient syncytial state, the germline cyst, and by increasing pericentromeric H3K9me3 modification, actions likely to suppress transposable element activity. Relatively open GSC chromatin is further restricted by Polycomb repression of testis or somatic cell-expressed genes briefly active in early female germ cells. Subsequently, Neijre/CBP and Myc help upregulate growth and reprogram GSC metabolism by altering mitochondrial transmembrane transport, gluconeogenesis, and other processes. In all these respects GSC differentiation resembles development of the totipotent zygote. We propose that the totipotent stem cell state was shaped by the need to resist transposon activity over evolutionary timescales.


Most animals are made up of two cell types: germline stem cells, which give rise to reproductive cells (egg and sperm) and pass their DNA to the next generation, and somatic cells, which make up the rest of the body. Transposable elements ­ fragments of DNA that can copy themselves and integrate into different parts of the genome ­ can greatly disrupt the integrity of the germ cell genome. Systems involving small RNAs and DNA methylation, which respectively modify the sequence and structure of the genome, can protect germ cells from the activity of transposable elements. While these systems have been studied extensively in late germ cells, less is known about how they work in germ cells generated early on in development. To investigate, Pang et al. studied the germline stem cells that give rise to eggs in female fruit flies. Techniques that measure DNA modifications showed that these germline stem cells and the cells they give rise to early on are better protected against transposable elements. This is likely due to the unusual cell cycle of early germ cells, which display a very short initial growth phase and special DNA replication timing during the synthesis phase. Until now, the purpose of these long-known cell cycle differences between early and late germ cells was not understood. Experiments also showed known transposable element defences are upregulated before the cell division that produces reproductive cells. DNA becomes more densely packed and germ cells connect with one another, forming germline 'cysts' that allow them to share small RNAs that can suppress transposable elements. Pang et al. propose that these changes compensate for the loss of enhanced repression that occurs in the earlier stem cell stage. Very similar changes also take place in the cells generated from fertilized eggs and in mammalian reproductive cells. Further experiments investigated how these changes impact the transition from stem cell to egg cell, revealing that germline stem cells express a wide diversity of genes, including most genes whose transcripts will be stored in the mature egg later on. Another type of cell produced by germline stem cells known as nurse cells, which synthesize most of the contents of the egg, dramatically upregulate genes supporting growth. Meanwhile, 25% of genes initially expressed in germline stem cells are switched off during the transition, partly due to a mechanism called Polycomb-mediated repression. The findings advance fundamental knowledge of how germline stem cells become egg cells, and could lead to important findings in developmental biology. Furthermore, understanding that for practical applications germline stem cells do not need to retain transposable element controls designed for evolutionary time scales means that removing them may make it easier to obtain and manipulate new stem cell lines and to develop new medical therapies.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Oogonial Stem Cells , Animals , Male , Drosophila/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , Oogonial Stem Cells/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Stem Cells/metabolism , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Germ Cells/metabolism , Gene Expression , Biology , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism
2.
Clin Spine Surg ; 36(2): E59-E69, 2023 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36191093

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study is to report the 1-year clinical and radiographic outcomes and safety profile of patients who underwent lumbar facet arthroplasty through implantation of the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS) device. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar facet arthroplasty is one proposed method of dynamic stabilization to treat grade-1 spondylolisthesis with stenosis; however, there are currently no Food and Drug Administration-approved devices for facet arthroplasty. METHODS: Standard demographic information was collected for each patient. Radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed preoperatively and at regular postoperative intervals. Complication and reoperation data were also collected for each patient. RESULTS: At the time of this study, 153 patients had undergone implantation of the TOPS device. The mean surgical time was 187.8 minutes and the mean estimated blood loss was 205.7cc. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.0 days. Mean Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Score leg and back, and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire scores improved significantly at all postoperative time points ( P >0.001). There were no clinically significant changes in radiographic parameters, and all operative segments remained mobile at 1-year follow-up. Postoperative complications occurred in 11 patients out of the 153 patients (7.2%) who underwent implantation of the TOPS device. Nine patients (5.9%) underwent a total of 13 reoperations, 1 (0.6%) of which was for device-related failure owing to bilateral L5 pedicle screw loosening. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar facet arthroplasty with the TOPS device demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in all patient-reported outcome measures and the ability to maintain motion at the index level while limiting sagittal translation with a low complication rate.


Subject(s)
Spinal Fusion , Spinal Stenosis , Spondylolisthesis , Humans , Arthroplasty , Constriction, Pathologic/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Prospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , Spinal Stenosis/etiology , Spondylolisthesis/diagnostic imaging , Spondylolisthesis/surgery , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 38(1): 115-125, 2023 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36152329

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a posterior facet replacement device, the Total Posterior Spine (TOPS) System, for the treatment of one-level symptomatic lumbar stenosis with grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. Posterior lumbar arthroplasty with facet replacement is a motion-preserving alternative to lumbar decompression and fusion. The authors report the preliminary results from the TOPS FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) trial. METHODS: The study was a prospective, randomized controlled FDA IDE trial comparing the investigational TOPS device with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and pedicle screw fixation. The minimum follow-up duration was 24 months. Validated patient-reported outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain. The primary outcome was a composite measure of clinical success: 1) no reoperations, 2) no device breakage, 3) ODI reduction of ≥ 15 points, and 4) no new or worsening neurological deficit. Patients were considered a clinical success only if they met all four measures. Radiographic assessments were made by an independent core laboratory. RESULTS: A total of 249 patients were evaluated (n = 170 in the TOPS group and n = 79 in the TLIF group). There were no statistically significant differences between implanted levels (L4-5: TOPS, 95% and TLIF, 95%) or blood loss. The overall composite measure for clinical success was statistically significantly higher in the TOPS group (85%) compared with the TLIF group (64%) (p = 0.0138). The percentage of patients reporting a minimum 15-point improvement in ODI showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.037) favoring TOPS (93%) over TLIF (81%). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the percentage of patients reporting a minimum 20-point improvement on VAS back pain (TOPS, 87%; TLIF, 64%) and leg pain (TOPS, 90%; TLIF, 88%) scores. The rate of surgical reintervention for facet replacement in the TOPS group (5.9%) was lower than the TLIF group (8.8%). The TOPS cohort demonstrated maintenance of flexion/extension range of motion from preoperatively (3.85°) to 24 months (3.86°). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that posterior lumbar decompression and dynamic stabilization with the TOPS device is safe and efficacious in the treatment of lumbar stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Additionally, decompression and dynamic stabilization with the TOPS device maintains segmental motion.


Subject(s)
Pedicle Screws , Spinal Fusion , Spondylolisthesis , Humans , Spondylolisthesis/diagnostic imaging , Spondylolisthesis/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Treatment Outcome , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Prospective Studies , Constriction, Pathologic/surgery , Back Pain/surgery , Arthroplasty , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Retrospective Studies
4.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 119(42): e2204701119, 2022 10 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36215502

ABSTRACT

The synaptonemal complex (SC) is a proteinaceous scaffold that is assembled between paired homologous chromosomes during the onset of meiosis. Timely expression of SC coding genes is essential for SC assembly and successful meiosis. However, SC components have an intrinsic tendency to self-organize into abnormal repetitive structures, which are not assembled between the paired homologs and whose formation is potentially deleterious for meiosis and gametogenesis. This creates an interesting conundrum, where SC genes need to be robustly expressed during meiosis, but their expression must be carefully regulated to prevent the formation of anomalous SC structures. In this manuscript, we show that the Polycomb group protein Sfmbt, the Drosophila ortholog of human MBTD1 and L3MBTL2, is required to avoid excessive expression of SC genes during prophase I. Although SC assembly is normal after Sfmbt depletion, SC disassembly is abnormal with the formation of multiple synaptonemal complexes (polycomplexes) within the oocyte. Overexpression of the SC gene corona and depletion of other Polycomb group proteins are similarly associated with polycomplex formation during SC disassembly. These polycomplexes are highly dynamic and have a well-defined periodic structure. Further confirming the importance of Sfmbt, germ line depletion of this protein is associated with significant metaphase I defects and a reduction in female fertility. Since transcription of SC genes mostly occurs during early prophase I, our results suggest a role of Sfmbt and other Polycomb group proteins in downregulating the expression of these and other early prophase I genes during later stages of meiosis.


Subject(s)
Meiosis , Synaptonemal Complex , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Chromosome Pairing , Female , Humans , Meiotic Prophase I , Polycomb-Group Proteins/genetics , Synaptonemal Complex/genetics
5.
Elife ; 92020 08 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32773039

ABSTRACT

Polycomb silencing represses gene expression and provides a molecular memory of chromatin state that is essential for animal development. We show that Drosophila female germline stem cells (GSCs) provide a powerful system for studying Polycomb silencing. GSCs have a non-canonical distribution of PRC2 activity and lack silenced chromatin like embryonic progenitors. As GSC daughters differentiate into nurse cells and oocytes, nurse cells, like embryonic somatic cells, silence genes in traditional Polycomb domains and in generally inactive chromatin. Developmentally controlled expression of two Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2)-interacting proteins, Pcl and Scm, initiate silencing during differentiation. In GSCs, abundant Pcl inhibits PRC2-dependent silencing globally, while in nurse cells Pcl declines and newly induced Scm concentrates PRC2 activity on traditional Polycomb domains. Our results suggest that PRC2-dependent silencing is developmentally regulated by accessory proteins that either increase the concentration of PRC2 at target sites or inhibit the rate that PRC2 samples chromatin.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Gene Silencing/physiology , Germ Cells/growth & development , Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase/genetics , Polycomb Repressive Complex 1/genetics , Polycomb-Group Proteins/genetics , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Female , Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase/metabolism , Polycomb Repressive Complex 1/metabolism , Polycomb-Group Proteins/metabolism
6.
Genetics ; 209(2): 381-387, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29669732

ABSTRACT

Controlling the expression of genes using a binary system involving the yeast GAL4 transcription factor has been a mainstay of Drosophila developmental genetics for nearly 30 years. However, most existing GAL4 expression constructs only function effectively in somatic cells, but not in germ cells during oogenesis, for unknown reasons. A special upstream activation sequence (UAS) promoter, UASp was created that does express during oogenesis, but the need to use different constructs for somatic and female germline cells has remained a significant technical limitation. Here, we show that the expression problem of UASt and many other Drosophila molecular tools in germline cells is caused by their core Hsp70 promoter sequences, which are targeted in female germ cells by Hsp70-directed Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) generated from endogenous Hsp70 gene sequences. In a genetic background lacking genomic Hsp70 genes and associated piRNAs, UASt-based constructs function effectively during oogenesis. By reducing Hsp70 sequences targeted by piRNAs, we created UASz, which functions better than UASp in the germline and like UASt in somatic cells.


Subject(s)
HSP72 Heat-Shock Proteins/genetics , Oocytes/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , Transcriptional Activation , Animals , Drosophila/genetics , Female , HSP72 Heat-Shock Proteins/metabolism , RNA Interference
7.
Curr Biol ; 27(7): 1033-1039, 2017 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28318978

ABSTRACT

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is typically inherited from only one parent [1-3]. In animals, this is usually the mother. Maternal inheritance is often presented as the passive outcome of the difference in cytoplasmic content of egg and sperm; however, active programs enforce uniparental inheritance at two levels, eliminating paternal mitochondrial genomes or destroying mitochondria delivered to the zygote by the sperm [4-13]. Both levels operate in Drosophila [8, 12, 13]. As sperm formation begins, hundreds of doomed mitochondrial genomes are visualized within the two huge mitochondria of each spermatid. These genomes abruptly disappear during spermatogenesis. Genome elimination, which is not in the interests of the restricted genomes, is directed by nuclear genes. Mutation of EndoG, which encodes a mitochondria-targeted endonuclease, retarded elimination [8]. Here, we show that knockdown of the nuclear-encoded mtDNA polymerase (Pol γ-α), Tamas, produces a more complete block of mtDNA elimination. Tamas is found in large particles that localize to mtDNA during genome elimination. We discount a simple possible mechanism by showing that the 3'-exonuclease function of the polymerase is not needed. While DNA elimination is a surprising function for DNA polymerase, it could provide a robust nexus for nuclear control of mitochondrial genome copy number, since use of common interactions for elimination and replication might limit options for the mitochondrial genome to escape restriction. We suggest that the DNA polymerase may play this role more widely and that inappropriate activation of its elimination ability might underlie association of DNA loss syndromes with mutations of the human mtDNA polymerase [14-16].


Subject(s)
DNA Polymerase gamma/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Genome, Mitochondrial , Animals , DNA Polymerase gamma/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Fathers , Female , Male
8.
Elife ; 42015 Jun 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26102525

ABSTRACT

Previously, we described a large collection of Minos-Mediated Integration Cassettes (MiMICs) that contain two phiC31 recombinase target sites and allow the generation of a new exon that encodes a protein tag when the MiMIC is inserted in a codon intron (Nagarkar-Jaiswal et al., 2015). These modified genes permit numerous applications including assessment of protein expression pattern, identification of protein interaction partners by immunoprecipitation followed by mass spec, and reversible removal of the tagged protein in any tissue. At present, these conversions remain time and labor-intensive as they require embryos to be injected with plasmid DNA containing the exon tag. In this study, we describe a simple and reliable genetic strategy to tag genes/proteins that contain MiMIC insertions using an integrated exon encoding GFP flanked by FRT sequences. We document the efficiency and tag 60 mostly uncharacterized genes.


Subject(s)
Gene Targeting/methods , Staining and Labeling/methods , Animals , Artificial Gene Fusion , Drosophila , Genes, Reporter , Genetic Vectors , Green Fluorescent Proteins/analysis , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Mutagenesis, Insertional , Plasmids , Recombination, Genetic , Transposases/metabolism
9.
Dev Cell ; 22(3): 660-8, 2012 Mar 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22421049

ABSTRACT

Across the eukaryotic phylogeny, offspring usually inherit their mitochondrial genome from only one of two parents: in animals, the female. Although mechanisms that eliminate paternally derived mitochondria from the zygote have been sought, the developmental stage at which paternal transmission of mitochondrial DNA is restricted is unknown in most animals. Here, we show that the mitochondria of mature Drosophila sperm lack DNA, and we uncover two processes that eliminate mitochondrial DNA during spermatogenesis. Visualization of mitochondrial DNA nucleoids revealed their abrupt disappearance from developing spermatids in a process requiring the mitochondrial nuclease, Endonuclease G. In Endonuclease G mutants, persisting nucleoids are swept out of spermatids by a cellular remodeling process that trims and shapes spermatid tails. Our results show that mitochondrial DNA is eliminated during spermatogenesis, thereby removing the capacity of sperm to transmit the mitochondrial genome to the next generation.


Subject(s)
DNA, Mitochondrial/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/enzymology , Endodeoxyribonucleases/metabolism , Mitochondria/enzymology , Spermatids/metabolism , Spermatogenesis , Animals , DNA, Mitochondrial/analysis , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Endodeoxyribonucleases/genetics , Male , Mitochondria/chemistry
10.
Curr Biol ; 21(22): 1870-7, 2011 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22079111

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cells control progression through late mitosis by regulating Cdc20 and Cdh1, the two mitotic activators of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC). The control of Cdc20 protein levels during the cell cycle is not well understood. RESULTS: Here, we demonstrate that Cdc20 is degraded in budding yeast by multiple APC-dependent mechanisms. We find that the majority of Cdc20 turnover does not involve a second activator molecule but instead depends on in cis Cdc20 autoubiquitination while it is bound to its activator-binding site on the APC core. Unlike in trans ubiquitination of Cdc20 substrates, the APC ubiquitinates Cdc20 independent of APC activation by Cdc20's C box. Cdc20 turnover by this intramolecular mechanism is cell cycle regulated, contributing to the decline in Cdc20 levels that occurs after anaphase. Interestingly, high substrate levels in vitro significantly reduce Cdc20 autoubiquitination. CONCLUSION: We show here that Cdc20 fluctuates through the cell cycle via a distinct form of APC-mediated ubiquitination. This in cis autoubiquitination may preferentially occur in early anaphase, following depletion of Cdc20 substrates. This suggests that distinct mechanisms are able to target Cdc20 for ubiquitination at different points during the cell cycle.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes/metabolism , Ubiquitination , Anaphase , Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome , Arginine/metabolism , Blotting, Western , Cdc20 Proteins , Half-Life , Isoleucine/metabolism , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Protein Subunits/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/cytology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes/chemistry
11.
Science ; 321(5888): 575-7, 2008 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18653897

ABSTRACT

High copy number and random segregation confound genetic analysis of the mitochondrial genome. We developed an efficient selection for heritable mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) mutations in Drosophila, thereby enhancing a metazoan model for study of mitochondrial genetics and mutations causing human mitochondrial disease. Targeting a restriction enzyme to mitochondria in the germline compromised fertility, but escaper progeny carried homoplasmic mtDNA mutations lacking the cleavage site. Among mutations eliminating a site in the cytochrome c oxidase gene, mt:CoI(A302T) was healthy, mt:CoI(R301L) was male sterile but otherwise healthy, and mt:CoI(R301S) exhibited a wide range of defects, including growth retardation, neurodegeneration, muscular atrophy, male sterility, and reduced life span. Thus, germline expression of mitochondrial restriction enzymes creates a powerful selection and has allowed direct isolation of mitochondrial mutants in a metazoan.


Subject(s)
DNA Restriction Enzymes/metabolism , DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics , Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Genome, Mitochondrial , Mutation , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , DNA Restriction Enzymes/genetics , DNA, Mitochondrial/metabolism , Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Embryo, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Eye/anatomy & histology , Eye/growth & development , Female , Genome, Insect , Infertility, Male , Male , Mitochondrial Diseases/genetics , Mitochondrial Diseases/metabolism , Morphogenesis , Muscles/ultrastructure , Muscular Dystrophy, Animal , Spermatogenesis
12.
Genetics ; 179(1): 263-75, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18458100

ABSTRACT

Cse4p is an essential histone H3 variant in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that defines centromere identity and is required for proper segregation of chromosomes. In this study, we investigated phenotypic consequences of Cse4p mislocalization and increased dosage of histone H3 and Cse4p, and established a direct link between histone stoichiometry, mislocalization of Cse4p, and chromosome segregation. Overexpression of the stable Cse4p mutant, cse4(K16R), resulted in its mislocalization, increased association with chromatin, and a high rate of chromosome loss, all of which were suppressed by constitutive expression of histone H3 (delta 16H3). We determined that delta 16H3 did not lead to increased chromosome loss; however, increasing the dosage of histone H3 (GALH3) resulted in significant chromosome loss due to reduced levels of centromere (CEN)-associated Cse4p and synthetic dosage lethality (SDL) in kinetochore mutants. These phenotypes were suppressed by GALCSE4. We conclude that the chromosome missegregation of GALcse4(K16R) and GALH3 strains is due to mislocalization and a functionally compromised kinetochore, respectively. Suppression of these phenotypes by histone delta 16H3 and GALCSE4 supports the conclusion that proper stoichiometry affects the localization of histone H3 and Cse4p and is thus essential for accurate chromosome segregation.


Subject(s)
Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Gene Dosage/genetics , Histones/metabolism , Kinetochores/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , Histones/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...