Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Radial Sclerosing Lesions at Breast Cancer Screening.

Purpose To determine the upgrade rate for biopsy-proven radial scars and radial sclerosing lesions (RS). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, radiology and pathology databases from two tertiary breast centers were searched to identify patients with biopsy-confirmed RS between March 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, during which all mammography was performed with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Adjunct modalities such as MRI or US are performed at our centers to better characterize lesions identified at DBT. Patient demographics, imaging, needle and excisional biopsies, and follow-up data were collected at the patient level. Clopper-Pearson interval estimate for upgrade was calculated for 95% confidence using PropCIs package with R version 4.1.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) (1). Results During the study period, a total of 155 885 DBT examinations were performed. From these examinations, 146 biopsy-proven RS were identified in 142 women (median age, 58 years; age range, 26-87 years). A total of 80.1% (117 of 146) of all RS did not have associated atypia or malignancy, and 19.9% (29 of 146) had associated atypia at initial biopsy. A total of 66.7% (78 of 117) of RS without atypia or malignancy were surgically excised, 25.6% (30 of 117) were followed (median, 3 years; range, 1-7 years) with benign findings on imaging, and 7.7% (nine of 117) were lost to follow-up. The rate of malignancy upgrade was 0.9% (one of 117 [95% CI: 0.02, 4.7]); one RS without concurrent atypia or malignancy demonstrated invasive carcinoma at surgical excision. Conclusion RS without atypia had a low upgrade rate. Keywords: Mammography, Breast © RSNA, 2021.

Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Current Concepts in Biology, Imaging, and Treatment.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a group of heterogeneous epithelial proliferations confined to the milk ducts that nearly always present in asymptomatic women on breast cancer screening. A stage 0, preinvasive breast cancer, increased detection of DCIS was initially hailed as a means to prevent invasive breast cancer through surgical treatment with adjuvant radiation and/or endocrine therapies. However, controversy in the medical community has emerged in the past two decades that a fraction of DCIS represents overdiagnosis, leading to unnecessary treatments and resulting morbidity. The imaging hallmarks of DCIS include linearly or segmentally distributed calcifications on mammography or nonmass enhancement on breast MRI. Imaging features have been shown to reflect the biological heterogeneity of DCIS lesions, with recent studies indicating MRI may identify a greater fraction of higher-grade lesions than mammography does. There is strong interest in the surgical, imaging, and oncology communities to better align DCIS management with biology, which has resulted in trials of active surveillance and therapy that is less aggressive. However, risk stratification of DCIS remains imperfect, which has limited the development of precision therapy approaches matched to DCIS aggressiveness. Accordingly, there are opportunities for breast imaging radiologists to assist the oncology community by leveraging advanced imaging techniques to identify appropriate patients for the less aggressive DCIS treatments.

Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between standardized uptake value (SUV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of neoplastic lesions in the use of a simultaneous PET/MRI hybrid system. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with known primary malignancies underwent FDG PET/CT. They then underwent whole-body PET/MRI. Diffusion-weighted imaging was performed with free breathing and a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence with b values of 0, 350, and 750 s/mm(2). Regions of interest were manually drawn along the contours of neoplastic lesions larger than 1 cm, which were clearly identified on PET and diffusion-weighted images. Maximum SUV (SUVmax) on PET/MRI and PET/CT images, mean SUV (SUVmean), minimum ADC (ADCmin), and mean ADC (ADCmean) were recorded on PET/MR images for each FDG-avid neoplastic soft-tissue lesion with a maximum of three lesions per patient. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to asses the following relations: SUVmax versus ADCmin on PET/MR and PET/CT images, SUVmean versus ADCmean, and ratio of SUVmax to mean liver SUV (SUV ratio) versus ADCmin. A subanalysis of patients with progressive disease versus partial treatment response was performed with the ratio of SUVmax to ADCmin for the most metabolically active lesion. RESULTS: Sixty-nine neoplastic lesions (52 nonosseous lesions, 17 bone metastatic lesions) were evaluated. The mean SUVmax from PET/MRI was 7.0 ± 6.0; SUVmean, 5.6 ± 4.6; mean ADCmin, 1.10 ± 0.58; and mean ADCmean, 1.48 ± 0.72. A significant inverse Pearson correlation coefficient was found between PET/MRI SUVmax and ADCmin (r = -0.21, p = 0.04), between SUVmean and ADCmean (r = -0.18, p = 0.07), and between SUV ratio and ADCmin (r = -0.27, p = 0.01). A similar inverse Pearson correlation coefficient was found between the PET/CT SUVmax and ADCmin. Twenty of 24 patients had previously undergone PET/CT; five patients had a partial treatment response, and six had progressive disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. The ratio between SUVmax and ADCmin was higher among patients with progressive disease than those with a partial treatment response. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous PET/MRI is a promising technology for the detection of neoplastic disease. There are inverse correlations between SUVmax and ADCmin and between SUV ratio and ADCmin. Correlation coefficients between SUVmax and ADCmin from PET/MRI were similar to values obtained with SUVmax from the same-day PET/CT. Given that both SUV and ADC are related to malignancy and that the correlation between the two biomarkers is relatively weak, SUV and ADC values may offer complementary information to aid in determination of prognosis and treatment response. The combined tumoral biomarker, ratio between SUVmax and ADCmin, may be useful for assessing progressive disease versus partial treatment response.

Comparison of the accuracy of PET/CT and PET/MRI spatial registration of multiple metastatic lesions.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the spatial registration of conventional PET/CT with that of hybrid PET/MRI of patients with FDG-avid metastatic lesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with known metastatic lesions underwent FDG PET/CT followed by PET/MRI with a hybrid whole-body system. The inclusion criterion for tumor analysis was spherical or oval FDG-avid tumor clearly identified with both CT and MRI. The spatial coordinates (x, y, z) of the visually estimated centers of the lesions were determined for PET/CT (PET and CT independently) and PET/MRI (PET, T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence with radial stack-of-stars trajectory, T2-weighted sequence), and the b0 images of an echo-planar imaging (EPI) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquisition. All MRI sequences were performed in the axial plane with free breathing. The spatial coordinates of the estimated centers of the lesions were determined for PET and CT and PET and MRI sequences. Distance between the isocenter of the lesion on PET images and on the images obtained with the anatomic modalities was measured, and misregistration (in millimeters) was calculated. The degree of misregistration was compared between PET/CT and PET/MRI with a paired Student t test. RESULTS: Nineteen lesions were evaluated. On PET/CT images, the average of the total misregistration in all planes of CT compared with PET was 4.13 ± 4.24 mm. On PET/MR images, lesion misregistration between PET and T1-weighted gradient-echo images had a shift of 2.41 ± 1.38 mm and between PET and b0 DW images was 5.97 ± 2.83 mm. Similar results were calculated for 11 lesions on T2-weighted images. The shift on T2-weighted images compared with PET images was 2.24 ± 1.12 mm. Paired Student t test calculations for PET/CT compared with PET/MRI T1-weighted gradient-echo images with a radial stack-of-stars trajectory, b0 DW images, and T2-weighted images showed significant differences (p < 0.05). Similar results were seen in the analysis of six lung lesions. CONCLUSION: PET/MRI T1-weighted gradient-echo images with a radial stack-of-stars trajectory and T2-weighted images had more accurate spatial registration than PET/CT images. This may be because that the whole-body PET/MRI system used can perform simultaneous acquisition, whereas the PET/CT system acquires data sequentially. However, the EPI-based b0 DWI datasets were significantly misregistered compared with the PET/CT datasets, especially in the thorax. Radiologists reading PET/MR images should be aware of the potential for misregistration on images obtained with EPI-based DWI sequences because of inherent spatial distortion associated with this type of MRI acquisition.

Pulmonary nodules in patients with primary malignancy: comparison of hybrid PET/MR and PET/CT imaging.

PURPOSE: To assess diagnostic sensitivity of radial T1-weighted gradient-echo (radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE]) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, positron emission tomography (PET), and combined simultaneous PET and MR imaging with an integrated PET/MR system in the detection of lung nodules, with combined PET and computed tomography (CT) as a reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant prospective study, 32 patients with tumors who underwent clinically warranted fluorine 18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT followed by PET/MR imaging were included. In all patients, the thorax station was examined with free-breathing radial VIBE MR imaging and simultaneously acquired PET data. Presence and size of nodules and FDG avidity were assessed on PET/CT, radial VIBE, PET, and PET/MR images. Percentage of nodules detected on radial VIBE and PET images was compared with that on PET/MR images by using generalized estimating equations. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in pulmonary nodules with a diameter of at least 1 cm was compared between PET/CT and PET/MR imaging with Pearson rank correlation. RESULTS: A total of 69 nodules, including 45 FDG-avid nodules, were detected with PET/CT. The sensitivity of PET/MR imaging was 70.3% for all nodules, 95.6% for FDG-avid nodules, and 88.6% for nodules 0.5 cm in diameter or larger. PET/MR imaging had higher sensitivity than PET for all nodules (70.3% vs 61.6%, P = .002) and higher sensitivity than MR imaging for FDG-avid nodules (95.6% vs 80.0%, P = .008). There was a significantly strong correlation between SUVmax of pulmonary nodules obtained with PET/CT and that obtained with PET/MR imaging (r = 0.96, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Radial VIBE and PET data acquired simultaneously with PET/MR imaging have high sensitivity in the detection of FDG-avid nodules and nodules 0.5 cm in diameter or larger, with low sensitivity for small non-FDG-avid nodules.