Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 40
Filter
1.
Gen Dent ; 54(6): 403-7, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17134077

ABSTRACT

Mouthrinses that contain essential oils are effective for controlling plaque and periodontal disease. Recent studies have shown that such mouthrinses are effective at preventing the formation of biofilm in dental unit waterlines. However, there is no information in the literature regarding the effect of such mouthrinses on restorative materials used within the oral cavity. Specimens of three common restorative materials (a glass ionomer, a composite resin, and amalgam) were subjected to continuous exposure to Listerine and distilled water for 10 days; at that time, the strength, fluid sorption, and surface appearance of the specimens were compared. Specimens of the test materials also were placed in intraoral devices; volunteer patients wore these devices for 12 hours per day for a period of 10 days. During that time, the patients were instructed to rinse twice daily for 30 seconds with Listerine Cool Mint or a non-active mouthrinse. After 10 days, the specimens were salvaged from the devices and inspected by visible and SEM examination. This study indicates that routine use of mouthrinses containing essential oils (or even prolonged exposure to such mouthrinses) has no adverse effects on restorative materials that might be expected to react to such mixtures because of their chemical compositions. It was concluded that active mouthrinses do not appear to have any adverse effects on a variety of restorative biomaterials.


Subject(s)
Dental Materials , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Mouthwashes , Oils, Volatile , Salicylates , Terpenes , Absorption , Composite Resins , Compressive Strength , Dental Amalgam , Dental Stress Analysis , Drug Combinations , Glass Ionomer Cements , Humans , Immersion , Materials Testing , Mouthwashes/chemistry , Salicylates/chemistry , Surface Properties , Terpenes/chemistry
2.
J Clin Dent ; 12(4): 97-103, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11507923

ABSTRACT

Dental unit waterline biofilm has been recognized as a potential point of contamination and a risk to patients with any level of immunocompromise. Biofilm in dental unit waterlines, once established, has proven formidable to efforts in disinfection/disruption. This project compared standardized evaluation techniques by assessing the efficacy of a variety of agents that have been reported or suggested as useful in surface disinfection and/or antiseptic protocols. The zones of inhibition, minimum inhibitory/bactericidal concentrations and use-dilution with stainless steel carrier replicates tests assessed the disinfection of planktonic organisms using standardized microbial testing procedures. The disruption and/or disinfection of planktonic and biofilm organisms within naturally occurring dental unit waterlines were evaluated by culture and scanning electron microscopy. The six commercially available antimicrobial agents used to assess the techniques were bleach (sodium hypochlorite), Cavicide, glutaraldehyde, Listerine Antiseptic, Peridex and Sterilex Ultra. Comparisons between the results for each technique evaluated were determined for each product. All six agents demonstrated antimicrobial efficacy at the working concentrations designated by the manufacturers. Biofilm matrix elimination evaluated by scanning electron microscopy found virtually 0% elimination by glutaraldehyde to an estimated 90% elimination by Sterilex Ultra and bleach after one treatment. Treatment with Cavicide, Listerine Antiseptic and Peridex resulted in negligible elimination of the biofilm matrix. For comparability, the use of standardized testing techniques to evaluate a disinfection agent's efficacy against dental unit waterline contamination is essential. This project demonstrates a model system for evaluating disinfection agents potentially useful in the management of dental unit waterline biofilm, and should assist in educating the dental clinician in the appraisal of existing and future product claims.


Subject(s)
Biofilms/drug effects , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Dental Disinfectants/pharmacology , Dental Equipment , Water Microbiology , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Chlorophenols/pharmacology , Colony Count, Microbial , Disinfection/methods , Drug Combinations , Glutaral/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Organic Chemicals , Salicylates/pharmacology , Sodium Hypochlorite/pharmacology , Terpenes/pharmacology
3.
J Clin Periodontol ; 28(7): 610-6, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11422581

ABSTRACT

AIM: The antiviral effectiveness of widely used commercial mouthrinses has not been well studied. A project was undertaken to evaluate and compare the in vitro antiviral effectiveness of essential oil-containing mouthrinses (LA & TLA) and chlorhexidine mouthrinses (PX & CHX) on 2 different enveloped viruses, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) and Herpes simplex virus (HSV-1) McIntyre strain. METHOD: HIV-1(89.6) (1x10(5)/ml) and HSV-1 (1x10(6)/ml) in RPMI-1640 medium were treated with two commercially available forms of LA & TLA (tartar control LA), and 2 formulations of chlorhexidine [(PX), 0.12% chlorhexidine & (CHX), 0.2% chlorhexidine] for 30 sec. The antiviral effect was estimated by inhibition of the syncytia formation or the cytopathic effect (CPE) for HIV-1 on MT-2 cells and by inhibition of the plaque formation for HSV-1 on Vero cell monolayers. RESULTS: Undiluted LA, TLA, PX and CHX completely inhibited both HIV-189.6 and HSV-1 McIntyre strain. PX and CHX inhibited HIV-1 up to 1:4 dilution, whereas, LA and TLA inhibited HSV-1 up to 1:2 dilution. The antiviral effects of LA and TLA were found to be similar and also the antiviral effect of PX and CHX were also found to be comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The methods used in this investigation allow easy and reproducible evaluations of antiviral efficacy. The anti-HIV-1 and anti-HSV-1 effects of LA, TLA, PX and CHX as evidenced in our in vitro study suggest that we should investigate potential in vivo effects during the use of essential oil-containing or chlorhexidine containing products when used by patients as mouthrinses. If the clinical studies confirm the in vitro data, pre-procedural use by clinicians may be beneficial in reducing viral contamination of bio-aerosols during the delivery of dental care.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , HIV-1/drug effects , Herpesvirus 1, Human/drug effects , Mouthwashes/pharmacology , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Cell Line, Transformed , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Chlorocebus aethiops , Drug Combinations , Giant Cells/drug effects , Giant Cells/virology , Humans , Mouthwashes/administration & dosage , Oils, Volatile/administration & dosage , Oils, Volatile/pharmacology , Reproducibility of Results , Salicylates/administration & dosage , Salicylates/pharmacology , Terpenes/administration & dosage , Terpenes/pharmacology , Tumor Cells, Cultured , Vero Cells
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11402279

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Listerine Antiseptic, Tartar Control Listerine Antiseptic, and Peridex mouthrinses and a 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate solution against known pathogenic fungi. STUDY DESIGN: Standardized methods were used to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of the above agents versus representative fungal species. Minimum inhibitory concentration-minimum fungicidal concentrations in macrobroth dilutions, suspension kill-time, and effectiveness against an artificial biofilm-attached population were studied. RESULTS: All antimicrobials tested were effective against the fungal species under investigation at the concentration available commercially. Listerine Antiseptic showed a greater efficacy against attached artificial biofilm populations than the other antimicrobials tested. CONCLUSIONS: Listerine Antiseptic, Tartar Control Listerine Antiseptic, and Peridex mouthrinses show promise as a means to control the pathogenic fungal species under investigation and may have applications to reduce oral colonization.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Fungi/drug effects , Mouthwashes/pharmacology , Biofilms/drug effects , Candida/classification , Candida/drug effects , Candida albicans/drug effects , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Drug Combinations , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Fungi/pathogenicity , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mouth/microbiology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/drug effects , Salicylates/pharmacology , Spores/drug effects , Statistics as Topic , Terpenes/pharmacology , Time Factors
6.
J Clin Dent ; 11(1): 11-5, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11460287

ABSTRACT

The problem of potential pathogens in biofilm within dental unit waterlines is real. Even though some chemical agents can disinfect biofilms, there remains concern that all remnants of the biofilm matrix are not eliminated, even with periodic treatments, and the bacterial populations in dental unit waterlines recur rapidly. Toxic and caustic residual chemicals are also a concern. In multiple trials following overnight treatment of dental unit waterlines with Listerine Antiseptic (LA), recurrence was investigated by evaluating effluent and biofilm specimens by plate culture. The presence or absence of biofilm within the dental unit waterlines was evaluated, pre- and post-treatment, by scanning electron microscopy. Baseline evaluations of dental unit waterlines determined the effluent and biofilm to harbor an average of 1 x 10(5) CFU per ml and 1 x 10(4) CFU per cm2, respectively, prior to treatment. Overnight, 18-hour treatment with LA rendered effluent and biofilm samples free of recoverable bacteria in all cases immediately following treatment. Viable bacteria in the effluent of treated dental unit waterlines recurred to near pre-treatment levels by Day 7. The minimum inhibitory concentrations for each of the recovered isolates did not change following overnight treatment. Repeated overnight treatments at the beginning of a one-week study were effective in inhibiting recurrence of viable bacteria in the biofilm and effluent indefinitely, but still failed to completely remove the biofilm matrix. New tubing treated prior to use and then daily with LA did not develop a detectable biofilm by scanning electron microscopy during the study. One-month long follow-up clinical trials have demonstrated that a maintenance solution of a 1:50 concentration of LA and sterile distilled water in self-contained dental units with new tubing is effective for prolonged periods in maintaining the effluent within the American Dental Association's recommendation for the year 2000 of < 200 CFU per ml. The clinical significance of these findings is that a solution to the problem of dental unit waterline contamination may be currently available. Since antimicrobial LA is safe for patient use, it may be one of the most viable options suggested to date.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local , Dental Disinfectants , Dental Equipment , Drug Combinations , Salicylates , Terpenes , Water Microbiology , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Biofilms/drug effects , Dental Disinfectants/pharmacology , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Salicylates/pharmacology , Stem Cells , Terpenes/pharmacology
7.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 130(1): 65-72, 1999 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9919033

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transmission of microbial pathogens to patients from biofilm within dental unit waterlines, or DUWLs, is a concern. To reduce the risk of toxicity to dental patients when water coolants are used, numerous chemical agents have been tested. In a series of trials, the authors investigated the recurrence of microbial growth after treating DUWLs with sodium hypochlorite (bleach), or B; glutaraldehyde, or G; or isopropanol 15.3 percent, or I. METHODS: The authors excised tubing sections from dental units in a general clinic. The tubing sections were evaluated at baseline and after overnight treatment. Effluent water samples and biofilm samples from tubing sections also were evaluated, by culture, at baseline and after treatment with the chemical agents. Biofilm within the tubing was examined by scanning electron microscopy, or SEM, and the authors identified bacterial isolates using standard techniques. The authors performed minimum inhibitory concentration tests on identified isolates pre- and posttreatment and compared the results to determine possible differences in resistance. RESULTS: In baseline evaluations, the authors determined that the effluent and biofilm matrix harbored an average of 1 x 10(5) colony-forming units, or CFU, per square centimeter and 1 x 10(4) CFU/cm2 recoverable microorganisms, respectively. A single overnight treatment of the DUWLs with B, G or I rendered effluent and biofilm samples that were free of recoverable bacteria. The number of viable bacteria in the effluent and the biofilm of B- or I-treated DUWLs returned to pretreatment levels by day six and day 15, respectively. DUWLs treated with G showed evidence of bacterial recurrence in the effluent and the biofilm to pretreatment levels by day three. The authors compared recurrence of biofilm and effluent posttreatment with untreated control tubing. The lower recurrence of viable bacteria in both biofilm and effluent samples for tubing treated with B and I was significant (P < or = .05). No evidence of resistance to the agents was noted during the study. Multiple treatments held the bacterial population to below recoverable levels but failed to remove the biofilm matrix, as evidenced by SEM. CONCLUSIONS: B, G and I eliminated recoverable bacteria after treatment and inhibited their recurrence in DUWL. Recolonization rates varied by agent. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The residual effect of these agents raises concerns about the slow release of potentially toxic substances from the residual biofilm matrix. These agents reduce microorganisms in effluent water but do little to destroy the biofilm matrix in the DUWL, even with periodic treatments. Bacterial populations in the dental unit water rapidly recolonize the DUWL. Chemical agents or agents that potentially could be trapped in the matrix can represent an additional risk to the patient.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Dental Equipment/microbiology , Disinfection , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Water Microbiology , 2-Propanol/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacteria/growth & development , Colony Count, Microbial , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disinfectants/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Glutaral/therapeutic use , Humans , Intubation/instrumentation , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Risk Factors , Sodium Hypochlorite/therapeutic use , Surface Properties
8.
Compend Contin Educ Dent ; 19(10): 968-72, 977-8, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10371880

ABSTRACT

NUPRO Gold Tooth Whitening System was evaluated for efficacy according to the proposed ADA guidelines for acceptance. Sixty participants with discolored anterior teeth participated in a 14-day, double-blind, clinical trial. The participants were matched for age, gender, and oral health status and were given either a placebo gel without the active agent or the NUPRO Gold active gel, which they wore in a custom-fabricated mouth guard for home use. The shade of each participant's maxillary anterior teeth was evaluated using a value-oriented Vita Lumin Vacuum Shade Guide before the study. The same shade guide was used to determine shade changes. Time of use of the agent and potential side effects, such as tooth and gingival hypersensitivity and tissue irritation, were assessed at all recall examinations and were recorded by participants in daily diaries. The average shade change for the placebo users was less than one shade. The average shade change for the NUPRO Gold users was 6.96 shades. Tooth hypersensitivity varied from none to severe. Tissue irritation was minimal. The results of these evaluations indicate that NUPRO Gold is effective as a tooth-whitening system, when administered properly under the supervision of a dentist, with commonly reported side effects of transient tooth sensitivity and minimal gingival sensitivity. Little or no change in tissue health was noted. This study was supported by Dentsply Preventive Care (York, Pennsylvania).


Subject(s)
Peroxides/therapeutic use , Tooth Bleaching/methods , Tooth Discoloration/drug therapy , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Carbamide Peroxide , Color , Cuspid , Dental Devices, Home Care , Dentin Sensitivity/etiology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Gingival Diseases/etiology , Humans , Incisor , Male , Maxilla , Middle Aged , Peroxides/adverse effects , Tooth Bleaching/adverse effects , Urea/adverse effects , Urea/therapeutic use
9.
Oral Dis ; 3 Suppl 1: S85-7, 1997 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9456664

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this research was to determine if the accuracy of HIV saliva and serum test results were influenced by changes in collection sites. In order to do so, serum and saliva samples were collected from 615 subjects in eight different geographic settings. The oral fluid collection/testing systems utilized were the Orapette SalivaCard HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody test (Trinity Biotech, Ireland) and the Omni-SAL/ImmunoComb II HIV 1 & 2 Saliva Test (Orgenics Ltd, Israel). For comparison, serum samples were tested by ELISA (Ortho) with reactive results confirmed via HIV-1 and HIV-2 Western blots (Biotech/Dupont, Institute Pasteur). The HIV serum and oral fluid collections were conducted in numerous test sites, which provided a great diversity in temperature, lighting and physical layout. The tests proved to be 99.8% and 100% specific, and both were 100% sensitive, regardless of the physical setting of the collections. While these systems are not currently available in the US, this study clearly demonstrates they can accurately be utilized in a variety of clinical settings, providing great promise for future applications.


Subject(s)
HIV Antibodies/analysis , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV-1/isolation & purification , HIV-2/isolation & purification , Saliva/immunology , AIDS Serodiagnosis , Double-Blind Method , HIV Antibodies/blood , HIV Antibodies/isolation & purification , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Reproducibility of Results , Saliva/virology , Specimen Handling
10.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 11(1): 63-8, 1997.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9021526

ABSTRACT

The testing of oral fluid samples for the detection of HIV antibodies offers several advantages over the testing of blood. Our objective was to evaluate a new generation of rapid and simple assays designed specifically to detect HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies in oral fluids (saliva). Serum and oral fluid pairs were collected from 615 high- and low-risk individuals in the United States, Peru, and the ivory Coast. Two different oral fluid collection devices and rapid assay systems included: (1) the Orapette/SalivaCard HIV-1/ HIV-2 and (2) the Omni-Sal/ImmunoCcmb II HIV-1 and HIV-2. The corresponding serum pairs were analyzed by conventional ELISAs, and all reactive sera were confirmed with HIV-1 and HIV-2 Western blots. The results indicated a 100% sensitivity for both rapid oral fluid assays, including successful detection of HIV-2 antibodies. Specificities ranged from 99.8% to 100%. One sample produced a reactive result by the SalivaCard while being nonreactive by the other assays including the Western blots. Both assays performed excellently, indicating that antibodies to HIV can be detected reliably in oral fluids by simple and rapid assays. This combination of rapid testing technology and the use of easily collected oral fluid samples offers an efficient and accurate alternative to conventional testing and can be appropriately applied to a variety of testing situations for the laboratory diagnosis of HIV infection.


Subject(s)
HIV Antibodies/analysis , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV-1/immunology , HIV-2/immunology , Immunoassay/methods , Saliva/immunology , Blotting, Western , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Evaluation Studies as Topic , HIV Antibodies/blood , HIV Antibodies/immunology , Humans , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
Am J Dent ; 9(3): 93-5, 1996 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9002796

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of rinsing with original formulation Listerine Antiseptic (LA) on the level of viable salivary bacteria for periods up to 1 hour. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind, controlled, cross-over study, unstimulated saliva was collected from 25 subjects, serially diluted, and cultured on selective and non-selective media under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Streptococci, Veillonella sp., and total aerobic and anaerobic flora were enumerated just prior to and 2, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after rinsing for 30 seconds with either 20 ml of LA or a 5% hydroalcohol control rinse. RESULTS: After the control rinse, total flora cultivated on MM10 agar exhibited a non-significant (P > 0.05) 10%-20% decrease relative to baseline. In contrast, rinsing with LA resulted in a significant (P < 0.05) 60%-65% decrease from baseline in all four microbial groups at 2 minutes; except in the case of Veillonella, the significant decreases were sustained up to 60 minutes. Total Listerine group aerobic, anaerobic and streptococcal counts were significantly lower than placebo (P < 0.05). The significant reduction in salivary bacterial levels seen in the Listerine group for up to 60 minutes suggests that this antiseptic mouthrinse may have use clinically as a pre-procedural rinse to decrease the level of viable microorganisms in aerosols generated during dental procedures.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Bacteria/drug effects , Mouthwashes/pharmacology , Salicylates/pharmacology , Saliva/microbiology , Terpenes/pharmacology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Colony Count, Microbial , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Humans , Time Factors
12.
MSDA J ; 39(1): 31-6, 1996.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9569873

ABSTRACT

The effectiveness of a one-day acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) continuing education course for dentists and hygienists was evaluated using pretest, posttest, and six-month follow-up questionnaires. There was a general, though not statistically significant, increase in the percentage of respondents who reported they planned to be immunized against hepatitis B, and a statistically significant increase in dentists' perceptions of the percentage of their patients at risk for AIDS. The percentage of respondents who believed the private practice setting is the preferred practice site for treating healthy patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) increased, though the increase was not statistically significant. Six-month follow-up results found a significant increase in the percentage of respondents who reported being immunized against hepatitis B. Other posttest results were maintained at the six-month follow-up. These results support the contention that a traditional lecture approach in AIDS continuing dental professional education can be beneficial.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , Education, Dental, Continuing , HIV Infections , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Dental Hygienists/education , Dental Hygienists/psychology , Dentists/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Mid-Atlantic Region , Program Evaluation/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol ; 72(4): 425-9, 1991 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1923440

ABSTRACT

Recurrent aphthous ulceration (RAU) remains a clinical problem for many patients. Efforts in prevention and/or treatment with prescription and nonprescription formulations have to date resulted in minimal success at best. A 6-month double-blind clinical study of 96 adults compared a commercially available antimicrobial mouthrinse (Listerine Antiseptic [LA], Warner-Lambert Co., Morris Plains, N.J.) and a hydroalcoholic control to evaluate the effects of vigorous twice-daily rinsing on the incidence, duration, and severity of RAU in persons prone to this disorder. LA rinse and the hydroalcoholic rinse resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of RAU occurrences from baseline. The duration of lesions and the severity of pain in subjects with ulcers during the treatment period were also significantly reduced in the LA rinse group of patients when compared with baseline. The hydroalcoholic rinse did not show a significant effect versus baseline for either severity or duration of the lesions. Rinsing therefore can be of clinical value in reducing the occurrence of RAU in susceptible patients, and LA rinse can be of significant additional value in decreasing the duration and severity of RAU.


Subject(s)
Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Salicylates/therapeutic use , Stomatitis, Aphthous/drug therapy , Terpenes/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Ethanol/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Recurrence , Stomatitis, Aphthous/prevention & control
16.
J Consult Clin Psychol ; 59(2): 258-65, 1991 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2030186

ABSTRACT

Preschool children (N = 107) were divided into 4 groups on the basis of maternal report; home and shelter groups exposed to verbal and physical conflict, a home group exposed to verbal conflict only, and a home control group. Parental ratings of behavior problems and competencies and children's self-report data were collected. Results show that verbal conflict only was associated with a moderate level of conduct problems: verbal plus physical conflict was associated with clinical levels of conduct problems and moderate levels of emotional problems; and verbal plus physical conflict plus shelter residence was associated with clinical levels of conduct problems, higher level of emotional problems, and lower levels of social functioning and perceived maternal acceptance. Findings suggests a direct relationship between the nature of the conflict and residence and type and extent of adjustment problems.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Personality Development , Social Adjustment , Spouse Abuse/psychology , Violence , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Personality Tests , Risk Factors , Social Environment
17.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol ; 70(6): 720-3, 1990 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2124667

ABSTRACT

Risk for acute infection increases as granulocyte levels decrease secondary to myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL). Acute exacerbations of concomitant inflammatory periodontal diseases can result in systemic infections in these patients. However, host-oral bacterial relationships in the periodontium in patients with ANLL are not well understood. Twenty-one adult patients with ANLL with periodontal disease ranging from gingivitis to severe periodontitis were studied. Supragingival and subgingival plaque specimens were collected before chemotherapy (prechemotherapy), and at a defined midpoint of myelosuppression (midchemotherapy; day 14). All specimens were extensively cultured both aerobically and anaerobically. Data were submitted to a partial correlational analysis, controlling for covariation relation to oral hygiene intervention and antibiotic administration. Levels of total yeast exhibited a significant association with Staphylococcus sp. at supragingival sites midchemotherapy (r = 0.68, p less than or equal to 0.05). Levels of total yeast also correlated positively with Pseudomonas aeruginosa at subgingival sites both prechemotherapy (r = 0.70, p less than or equal to 0.01) and midchemotherapy (r = 0.61, p less than or equal to 0.05). Significant correlations of levels of Veillonella sp. with Neisseria sp. and gram-negative enteric bacilli were observed in both supragingival (r = 0.95, 0.77, p values less than or equal to 0.01) and subgingival (r = 0.69, 0.61, p values less than or equal to 0.05) plaque specimens midchemotherapy but not prechemotherapy. These data suggest that potentially pathogenic bacteria occur in plaque simultaneous with granulocytopenia in these patients. Multiple mechanisms, including intergeneric coaggregation and other symbiotic relationships, may influence infectivity of the mixed plaque flora and thus contribute to the oral ecology observed in these patients.


Subject(s)
Agranulocytosis/etiology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/complications , Periodontal Diseases/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Agranulocytosis/physiopathology , Bacterial Infections , Dental Plaque/complications , Dental Plaque/microbiology , Ecology , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neisseria/isolation & purification , Periodontal Diseases/complications , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Veillonella/isolation & purification
18.
J Clin Periodontol ; 17(8): 575-9, 1990 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2212088

ABSTRACT

A 6-month double-blind, controlled clinical study was completed with 124 healthy adult subjects to determine the efficacy of 2 mouthrinses, Listerine (LA) and Peridex (PX), used as supplements to regular oral hygiene measures in reducing supragingival dental plaque and gingivitis. Following screening examinations for entry levels of existing gingivitis and plaque, baseline gingival and plaque area indices, extrinsic tooth stain, supragingival calculus, bleeding and soft tissue condition were recorded. All subjects then received a complete dental prophylaxis to remove plaque, calculus and extrinsic stain. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups and performed supervised rinses twice daily for 30 s in addition to their normal oral hygiene, for 6 months. All indices were again evaluated at 3 and 6 months. After 6 months, LA and PX significantly (p less than 0.001) inhibited development of plaque by 36.1% and 50.3%, respectively, and the development of gingivitis by 35.9% and 30.5%, respectively, compared to a hydroalcohol control. PX was more effective in inhibiting plaque and both mouthrinses appeared to be equally effective in inhibiting gingivitis. LA patients did not develop significant levels of stain or supragingival calculus at 6 months, compared to baseline or control. PX patients developed significant levels of extrinsic stain and supragingival calculus compared to baseline and control. Though PX was more effective than LA in the control of plaque, this study indicates that both LA and PX were effective agents in a regimen for the control of plaque and gingivitis.


Subject(s)
Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Dental Plaque/prevention & control , Gingivitis/prevention & control , Mouthwashes , Salicylates/therapeutic use , Terpenes/therapeutic use , Adult , Chlorhexidine/adverse effects , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Dental Calculus/prevention & control , Dental Plaque Index , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Periodontal Index , Salicylates/adverse effects , Terpenes/adverse effects , Tooth Discoloration/chemically induced
19.
Int J Prosthodont ; 3(4): 369-74, 1990.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2088373

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the effect of an antimicrobial mouthrinse, denture soft relines, and a placebo rinse on the clinical findings and microbial flora of 78 patients with denture stomatitis. For 28 days the study and control groups performed oral rinses and denture soaks. Reline group patients had maxillary denture soft relines that were changed every 7 days. At the end of the study, the mean severity of denture stomatitis was significantly less in the groups that used the study rinse (P less than 0.01) and received denture relines (P less than 0.05) compared to the control. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences in ranked adjusted percentage counts in two out of 13 denture plaque organisms investigated (Fusobacterium nucleatum [P less than 0.05] and total Bacteroides [P less than 0.05]), with the antiseptic rinse producing the lowest count. Yeast populations were reduced, but not significantly (P = 0.07). In the absence of other mechanical denture hygiene procedures, the antiseptic rinse and relines were equally effective in reducing denture stomatitis and potential pathogens of denture plaque flora.


Subject(s)
Mouthwashes , Stomatitis, Denture/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Denture Liners , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Stomatitis, Denture/microbiology
20.
J Clin Periodontol ; 16(6): 347-52, 1989 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2760246

ABSTRACT

This study was undertaken to determine whether long-term use (6-months) of an antiseptic mouthrinse (Listerine Antiseptic, Warner Lambert Co., Morris Plains, NJ, USA) led to an undesirable succession of oral pathogens or the emergence of resistant microbial forms. Supragingival plaque was collected from 83 subjects before treatment and after either 3 or 6 months use of either the active antiseptic or a 5% hydroalcohol control. Subjects rinsed with their assigned mouthrinse twice daily under supervision. The plaque samples were analyzed for microbial content by darkfield microscopy, culture on a series of nonselective and selective bacterial media, and by recognition of microbial forms by recognition of distinct colony on a nonselective medium. Statistical analysis of the results revealed no significant microbial shifts including no significant increases in presumptive oral pathogens, spirochetes, black-pigmented Bacteroides, Streptococcus mutans, or Candida albicans. Additionally, no detectable rise in either staphylococci or enteric bacteria, potential opportunistic pathogens, was observed.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/drug effects , Dental Plaque/microbiology , Mouthwashes/pharmacology , Salicylates/pharmacology , Terpenes/pharmacology , Adolescent , Adult , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Culture Media , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Microscopy/methods , Random Allocation , Spirochaetales/drug effects , Spirochaetales/isolation & purification , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...