Sister Society Meeting on Global Education Development and Collaboration: Meeting Report.

OBJECTIVES: To identify common barriers to teaching and training and to identify strategies that would be useful in developing future training programs in gynecologic oncology in low- and middle- income countries. METHODS: There is a lack of overall strategy to meet the needs of education and training in gynecologic oncology in low- and middle- income countries, the leaderships of sister societies and global health volunteers met at the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology in October 23, 2015. The challenges of the training programs supported by gynecologic oncology societies, major universities and individual efforts were presented and discussed. Strategies to improve education and training were identified. RESULTS: Major challenges include language barriers, limited surgical equipment, inadequate internet access, lack of local support for sustainability in training programs, inadequate pathology and radiation oncology, finance and a global deficiency in identifying sites and personnel in partnering or developing training programs. The leaderships identified various key components including consultation with the local Ministry of Health, local educational institutions; inclusion of the program into existing local programs, a needs assessment, and the development of curriculum and regional centers of excellence. CONCLUSIONS: Proper preparation of training sites and trainers, the development of global curriculum, the establishment of centers of excellence, and the ability to measure outcomes are important to improve education and training in gynecologic oncology in low- and middle- income countries.

Do single and partnered women with gynecologic cancer differ in types and intensities of illness- and treatment-related psychosocial concerns? A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the psychosocial and psychosexual concerns of single and partnered women with gynecologic cancer, since relationship status and psychosocial context are known to affect sexuality, a life domain commonly affected by this cancer. METHOD: A cross-sectional convenience sample of 49 women (68% response), with ovarian (n=31), endometrial (n=12), and cervical (n=6) cancer, responded to a 72-item self-report Cancer Concerns Questionnaire and additional psychosocial questionnaires. RESULTS: Single (n=13) and partnered women (n=36) similarly reported prognosis as their highest concern, but single women (26% of the sample) reported that communication with the treatment team, treatment side effects, and prognosis were of greater salience to them than did partnered women. The latter group had greater sexuality and partner relationship concerns. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings suggest that relationship status, whether partnered or single, influences current psychosocial concerns among women with gynecologic cancer, despite similar levels of illness- and treatment-related intrusions on important life domains.

Consolidative abdominopelvic radiotherapy after surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and morbidity of sequential cytoreductive surgery, carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, and consolidative abdominopelvic radiotherapy (APRT) in ovarian cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2000, 29 patients with optimally cytoreduced epithelial ovarian cancer were treated with carboplatin (135 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (area under the curve [AUC] of 6) followed by APRT in a prospective protocol. All patients were clinically, radiographically, and biochemically (CA-125) free of disease at the completion of chemotherapy. Abdominopelvic radiotherapy was delivered using 6 MV anterior-posterior photon fields to encompass the peritoneal cavity. Median follow-up was 4 years. RESULTS: Two patients experienced Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity during APRT; 6 patients, Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia; and 3 patients, Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. Overall, 10 patients had Grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity. All of the acute side effects resolved after treatment was completed, and there were no serious consequences such as sepsis or hemorrhage. Abdominopelvic radiotherapy was abandoned prematurely in 3 patients. Late side effects were seen in 5 patients, including 1 small bowel obstruction, 2 symptomatic sacral insufficiency fractures, 1 case of severe dyspareunia, and 1 case of prolonged fatigue. All resolved with supportive management. The 4-year actuarial disease-free survival was 57%, and the overall survival was 92%. Eleven of 12 patients who relapsed received salvage chemotherapy, which was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominopelvic radiotherapy after optimal surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy is associated with an acceptable risk of acute and late side effects and does not limit subsequent salvage chemotherapy. Consolidative APRT warrants further investigation as a means of improving the outcome of patients with ovarian cancer.

Feasibility study of multidisciplinary oncology rounds by videoconference for surgeons in remote locales.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of using videoconferencing to involve community-based surgeons in interactive, multidisciplinary oncology rounds so they may benefit from the type of community of practice that is usually only available in academic cancer centres. METHODS: An existing videoconference service provider with sites across Ontario was chosen and the series was accredited. Indirect needs assessment involved examining responses to a previously conducted survey of provincial surgeons; interviewing three cancer surgeons from different regions of Ontario; and by analyzing an online portfolio of self-directed learning projects. Direct needs assessment involved a survey of surgeons at videoconference-enabled sites. A surgical, medical and radiation oncologist plus a facilitator were scheduled to guide discussion for each session. A patient scenario developed by the discussants was distributed to participants one week prior to each session. RESULTS: Direct and indirect needs assessment confirmed that breast cancer and colorectal cancer topics were of greatest importance to community surgeons. Six one-hour sessions were offered (two breast, two colorectal, one gynecologic and one lung cancer). A median of 22 physicians and a median of eight sites participated in each session. The majority of respondents were satisfied with the videoconference format, presenters and content. Many noted that discussion prompted reflection on practice and that current practice would change. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated that it is possible to engage remote surgeons in multidisciplinary oncology rounds by videoconference. Continued assessment of videoconferencing is warranted but further research is required to develop frameworks by which to evaluate the benefits of telehealth initiatives.

Histopathologic score predicts recurrence free survival after radical surgery in patients with stage IA2-IB1-2 cervical carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated clinical and pathologic factors that predicted for recurrence after patients underwent radical surgery for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage IA(2)-IB(1-2) cervical carcinoma and developed a simple method of scoring those predictive factors to quantify outcome. METHODS: An analysis was conducted of a prospective radical surgery cervical carcinoma data base. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was done for each of the individual factors to estimate individual risk ratios using all available data for each factor. Stepwise and best-model options were used to identify the best combinations as predictors and to calculate adjusted risk ratios. Based on the information obtained, each patient was assigned a categorical score to predict recurrence. The variables used for the score were dichotomized. The differences between the scores in time to recurrence were evaluated using the log-rank test to compare the time to recurrence curves that were generated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Eight hundred seventy-one patients were included in the study, and 66 patients who developed recurrent disease after a median follow-up of 49 months. Tumor size, maximum depth of invasion, pelvic lymph node status, tumor grade, and capillary lymphatic space (CLS) were single predictors for recurrence, and the score, which was based on combinations of these factors, predicted the disease free survival. Maximum depth of invasion, pelvic lymph node status, and CLS were the best combined predictors for recurrence, and they were used to form a second, precise scoring system to predict disease free survival (P < 0.0001; log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The scoring system based on maximal depth of invasion, CLS, and pelvic lymph node metastases identified four strata of patients with distinct recurrence free survival. The incremental presence of each factor decreased recurrence free survival after patients underwent radical surgery. Patients with the presence of all three factors had a 5-year recurrence free survival rate of 65%. These patients would be suitable for studies of postoperative adjuvant therapy to improve outcome.

Referral patterns for gynaecologic cancers and precancerous conditions.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine a gynaecologist's preference for delivering primary surgical care to women with gynaecologic cancer or precancerous conditions; (2) to determine referral patterns for gynaecologic cancers and precancerous conditions; (3) to outline barriers to the current gynaecologic oncology service provision in Ontario; (4) to understand, from a gynaecologist's perspective, the acceptable waiting times from referral to subspecialty consultation; and (5) to determine a gynaecologist's interest in following patients after more specialized management for gynaecologic cancer. METHODS: The survey instrument was designed and pretested. The survey was mailed to 541 gynaecologists in Ontario. RESULTS: The response rate was 49.4%. Of the gynaecologists who responded, 75.3% trained in Ontario; 57.3% had community-based practices; and 55% indicated they surgically treated women with invasive cancers. The invasive cases treated most commonly were endometrial cancer (96.4%), followed by ovarian cancer (86.1%). Ninety-one percent of gynaecologists referred their patients to the closest cancer centre with a gynaecologic oncologist on staff. Seventy-five percent of gynaecologists were interested in delivering follow-up care for women who had treatment for cancer, provided that follow-up guidelines were made available. CONCLUSION: Gynaecologists were interested in providing follow-up care to women who received cancer care by subspecialists. Gynaecologists requested continuing education on gynaecologic cancers and guidelines for follow-up care. Issues surrounding the process of referral and communication with gynaecologists were seen as areas for improvement. The results of this survey will be pivotal in setting goals for a provincial gynaecologic oncology program.