Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J AOAC Int ; 94(5): 1573-80, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22165023

ABSTRACT

This study compared recovery of fecal coliform bacteria from sewage by Colilert-18 and Standard Methods 9222D (membrane-Fecal Coliform medium) in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Alternative Test Protocol (ATP). Samples were collected from 10 different wastewater treatment plants in the northeastern United States and tested in a single laboratory. Twenty replicates of each sample were analyzed by each method, and 200 positive and 200 negative responses were confirmed for each method. Recovery of fecal coliforms by Colilert-18 was significantly higher than (8 of 10 sites) or statistically equivalent to (1 of 10 sites) recovery by the reference method (Standard Methods 9222D) for samples from all but one site. Both methods had low false-positive rates (< 2%); however, the false-negative rate observed with Standard Methods 9222D (21.5%) was substantially higher than that observed with Colilert-18 (7%). The accuracy rates of the two methods were calculated as 96.5 and 88.9% for Colilert-18 and Standard Methods 9222D, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate that Colilert-18 meets the acceptance criteria for alternative methods specified in the EPA ATP.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Load/methods , Enterobacteriaceae/chemistry , Feces/microbiology , Waste Disposal, Fluid , Water Microbiology , Algorithms , Enterobacteriaceae/classification , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Filtration , New England , Quality Control , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , United States , United States Environmental Protection Agency
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...