Identifying dementia in the primary care practice.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility (i.e., positive and negative predictive value) of the 7 Minute Screen in identifying patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a primary care practice. A second objective was to estimate the number of undiagnosed AD patients in a typical primary care practice. METHODS: One hundred thirty-seven successive admissions (96%) of patients over the age of 60 to a primary care practice over a 53-day period who completed informed consent documents were administered the 7 Minute Screen. All patients who screened positive (n = 13) and a random sample of those who screened negative (n = 26) returned for full diagnostic evaluation. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the 7 Minute Screen were determined using the criterion standard of clinical diagnosis established by examination, history, and laboratory studies. Test-retest reliability and time for administration were also determined. RESULTS: Of the 137 patients evaluated, 13 screened positive and 124 screened negative. Eleven of the 13 patients who screened positive were willing to return to the primary care practice for follow-up evaluation. A random sample of 26 patients who screened negative all agreed to return for follow-up evaluation. Of the 11 patients who screened positive and who returned for evaluation, 10 were subsequently diagnosed with probable AD. The remaining patient was diagnosed with mixed dementia. The caregivers of the two patients who refused to return were contacted and both indicated that the patients were having significant cognitive problems as verified by an activities of daily living scale. Of the 26 patients who screened negative, 25 were judged to be cognitively normal and the 26th was judged to have mild cognitive impairment. DISCUSSION: In successive admissions of patients over the age of 60 in a primary care practice, the 7 Minute Screen showed a PPV of 91% and an NPV of 96% in identifying patients who were subsequently identified with AD or other dementing disorder. These data suggest that this may be a useful instrument in identifying patients who should undergo diagnostic evaluation for AD and other dementing disorders. Additionally, extrapolation from the data in this practice suggests that there may be between 75 and 100 AD patients in the typical primary care practice, many of whom may not be diagnosed.

A 7 minute neurocognitive screening battery highly sensitive to Alzheimer's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity and reliability of a rapidly administered neurocognitive screening battery consisting of 4 brief tests (Enhanced Cued Recall, Temporal Orientation, Verbal Fluency, and Clock Drawing) to distinguish between patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy control subjects. SUBJECTS: Sixty successive referrals to the Memory Disorders Clinic at Southwestern Vermont Medical Center, Bennington, who were diagnosed as having probable AD and 60 community-dwelling volunteers of comparable age, sex distribution, and education. DESIGN: Interrater and test-retest reliability, intergroup comparisons between patients with AD and control subjects on the 4 individual tests, and determination of probability of dementia for patients with AD and control subjects using the entire battery of tests. SETTING: Outpatient care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Comparison of the probability of dementia on the 7 Minute Screen with the criterion standard of clinical diagnosis established by examination and laboratory studies. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Test-retest and interrater reliability (correlation coefficients), time for administration. RESULTS: Mean time of administration was 7 minutes 42 seconds. Mean scores for patients with AD and control subjects on all 4 individual tests were significantly different (for each, P<.001). When the 4 tests were combined in a logistic regression, the battery had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100%. A series of 1000 repeated random samples of 30 patients with AD and 30 control subjects taken from the overall sample of 60 patients with AD and 60 control subjects had a mean sensitivity of 92% and a mean specificity of 96%. The battery was equally sensitive to patients with mild AD as demonstrated by correctly classifying all 13 patients with AD using Mini-Mental State Examination scores of 24 or higher. Neither age nor education was a statistically significant factor when added as a covariate. Test-retest reliabilities for individual tests ranged from 0.83 to 0.93. Test-retest reliability for the entire battery was 0.91. Interrater reliability for the entire battery was 0.92. CONCLUSIONS: The 7 Minute Screen appears highly sensitive to AD and may be useful in helping to make initial distinctions between patients experiencing cognitive changes related to the normal aging process and those experiencing cognitive deficits related to dementing disorders such as AD. It has reasonable interrater and test-retest reliability, can be administered in a brief period, and requires no clinical judgment and minimal training.