Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 50(2): 182-6, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22420605

ABSTRACT

Objective : To determine the reliability and reproducibility of using three-dimensional digital models as an alternative to plaster models for rating dental arch relationships in patients born with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Design : Reliability and reproducibility study. Methods : Study models of 45 patients born with unilateral cleft lip and palate were made available in plaster and three-dimensional digital models. Records were scored a week apart by three examiners using the 5-year-olds' index reference models in the same two formats as the patient models. To assess reproducibility the study was repeated 4 weeks later under similar conditions to minimize the influence of memory bias on the results. The reliability of using the three-dimensional digital models was determined by comparing the scores for each examiner with the plaster model scores. Results : Weighted kappa statistics indicated repeatability for the plaster models was very good (.83 to .87). For the three-dimensional digital models it was good to very good (.74 to .83). Overall, the use of the three-dimensional digital models showed good agreement with the plaster model scores on both occasions. Conclusion : Three-dimensional digital models appear to be a good alternative to plaster models for assessing dental arch relationships using the 5-year-olds' index.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Dental Arch , Cleft Palate , Humans , Models, Dental , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Br Dent J ; 213(9): 467-70, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23138807

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This paper explores the impact of recruiting patients to a randomised controlled trial (RCT) at recruiting centres. This large multicentre RCT examining the efficacy of chewing gum compared to ibuprofen in the relief of orthodontic pain was carried out across nine recruiting centres. METHOD: The work diaries of clinicians and supporting staff at recruiting centres were analysed over a four-month period from September to December 2011. This quantified the amount of clinical and non-clinical time spent on research duties. RESULTS: Over this time period 98 patients were recruited across seven trial sites. On average, patient recruitment had a direct clinical impact of 19 minutes per patient recruited. The time commitment on trial administration outside the clinical sessions was much higher, averaging at 110 minutes per patient recruited, giving the overall time spent on the trial 129 minutes per patient. CONCLUSIONS: This information will be valuable to lead researchers when calculating the full economic cost of a proposed clinical trial and therefore when applying for grant funding. It may also be valuable to clinicians and their managers when considering becoming a principle investigator (PI) in a RCT. Although the impact on clinical time was 19 minutes per patient recruited, there is a considerably higher (almost six times greater) time commitment in administration around the recruitment of patients.


Subject(s)
Patient Selection , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/economics , Workload/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , England , Geography, Medical , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Research Design , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Eur J Orthod ; 34(6): 768-72, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21828358

ABSTRACT

The aim of this investigation was to determine the optimal format for presenting the 5-year-olds' Index reference models for the assessment of dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). The 5-year-olds' Index reference models were presented in four different formats: plaster models, coloured acrylic models, and two digital formats, which included three-dimensional digital models (3D), and black and white photographs. These formats were used to rate 45 plaster models of patients born with UCLP by a total of seven examiners comprising experienced and inexperienced examiners. Scoring was undertaken 1 week apart for each format with the patient models reassigned on each occasion to reduce the effect of memory bias. For intra-examiner agreement, the patient models were scored 3 weeks later under similar conditions by the same examiners. The reliability of using the different formats was determined using the plaster reference models as the 'gold' standard for comparison. Analysis of the results using weighted kappa (k) statistics showed the magnitude of agreement for all the formats of the 5-year-olds' Index were good to very good between examiners. The more experienced examiners were consistently more reliable in their scoring using the different formats. This study clearly demonstrated that 3D digital models of the 5-year-olds' Index could prove to be a promising alternative to physical models of the 5-year-olds' Index.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip/pathology , Cleft Palate/pathology , Computer Simulation , Dental Arch/pathology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Models, Dental , Photography , Child, Preschool , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Dental Arch/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Observer Variation , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results
4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (2): CD002281, 2005 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15846633

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Removing dental plaque may play a key role maintaining oral health. There is conflicting evidence for the relative merits of manual and powered toothbrushing in achieving this. OBJECTIVES: To compare manual and powered toothbrushes in relation to the removal of plaque, the health of the gingivae, staining and calculus, dependability, adverse effects and cost. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (to 17/06/2004) and Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2004); MEDLINE (January 1966 to week 2 June 2004); EMBASE (January 1980 to week 2 2004) and CINAHL (January 1982 to week 2 June 2004). Manufacturers were contacted for additional data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were selected for the following criteria: design-random allocation of participants; participants - general public with uncompromised manual dexterity; intervention - unsupervised manual and powered toothbrushing for at least 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were the change in plaque and gingivitis over that period. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Six authors independently extracted information. The effect measure for each meta-analysis was the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined, along with sensitivity analyses for quality and publication bias. For discussion purposes SMD was translated into percentage change. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-two trials, involving 3855 participants, provided data. Brushes with a rotation oscillation action removed plaque and reduced gingivitis more effectively than manual brushes in the short term and reduced gingivitis scores in studies over 3 months. For plaque at 1 to 3 months the SMD was -0.43 (95% CI: -0.72 to -0.14), for gingivitis SMD -0.62 (95% CI: -0.90 to -0.34) representing an 11% difference on the Quigley Hein plaque index and a 6% reduction on the Loe and Silness gingival index. At over 3 months the SMD for plaque was -1.29 (95% CI: -2.67 to 0.08) and for gingivitis was -0.51 (-0.76 to -0.25) representing a 17% reduction on the Ainamo Bay bleeding on probing index. There was heterogeneity between the trials for the short-term follow up. Sensitivity analyses revealed the results to be robust when selecting trials of high quality. There was no evidence of any publication bias. No other powered designs were as consistently superior to manual toothbrushes.Cost, reliability and side effects were inconsistently reported. Any reported side effects were localised and temporary. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Powered toothbrushes with a rotation oscillation action reduce plaque and gingivitis more than manual toothbrushing. Observation of methodological guidelines and greater standardisation of design would benefit both future trials and meta-analyses.


Subject(s)
Dental Devices, Home Care , Dental Plaque/prevention & control , Gingivitis/prevention & control , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Dental Devices, Home Care/adverse effects , Dental Devices, Home Care/economics , Dental Plaque/complications , Gingival Diseases/prevention & control , Humans , Oral Health , Periodontal Diseases/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Toothbrushing/methods
5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (1): CD002281, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12535436

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Specific oral bacteria, generically known as "dental plaque" are the primary cause of gingivitis (gum disease) and caries. The removal of dental plaque is thought to play a key role in the maintenance of oral health. There is conflicting evidence for the relative merits of manual and powered toothbrushing in achieving this. OBJECTIVES: To compare manual and powered toothbrushes in relation to the removal of plaque, the health of the gingivae, staining and calculus, dependability, adverse effects and cost. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 22/8/02); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2002); MEDLINE (January 1966 to week 5 2002); EMBASE (January 1980 to week 3 July 2002) and CINAHL (January 1982 to June 2002). Manufacturers of powered toothbrushes were contacted for additional published and unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: design-random allocation of participants; participants-general public with uncompromised manual dexterity; intervention- supervised manual and powered toothbrushing for at least four weeks; primary outcomes-the change in plaque and gingivitis over that period. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Six reviewers independently extracted information in duplicate. Indices for plaque and gingivitis were expressed as standardised values for each study. The effect measure for each meta-analysis was the standardised mean difference (SMD) with the appropriate 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effect models. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined, along with sensitivity analyses for the items assessed for quality and publication bias. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-nine trials, involving 2,547 participants, provided data for the meta-analysis. Brushes that worked with a rotation oscillation action removed more plaque and reduced gingivitis more effectively than manual brushes in the short and long term. For plaque at one to three months the SMD was -0.44 (95% CI: -0.66 to -0.21), for gingivitis SMD -0.44 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.15). These represented an 11% reduction on the Quigley Hein plaque index and a 6% reduction on the Löe and Silness gingival index. At over three months the effects were SMD for plaque -1.15 (95% CI: -2.02,-0.29) and SMD for gingivitis -0.51 (95% CI: -0.76, -0.25). These represented a 7% reduction on the Quigley Hein Plaque Index and a 17% reduction on the Ainamo Bay Bleeding on Probing Gingival Index. The heterogeneity found in these meta-analyses for short term trials was caused by one trial that had exceptionally low standard deviations. Sensitivity analyses revealed the results to be robust when selecting trials of high quality. There was no evidence of any publication bias. No other powered brush designs were consistently superior to manual toothbrushes. In these trials, data on cost, reliability and side effects were inconsistently reported. Those side effects that were reported on in the trials were localised and temporary. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Powered toothbrushes with a rotation oscillation action achieve a modest reduction in plaque and gingivitis compared to manual toothbrushing. Observation of methodological guidelines and greater standardisation of design would benefit both future trials and meta-analyses.


Subject(s)
Dental Devices, Home Care , Dental Plaque/prevention & control , Gingivitis/prevention & control , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Dental Devices, Home Care/adverse effects , Dental Devices, Home Care/economics , Dental Plaque/complications , Gingival Diseases/prevention & control , Humans , Oral Health , Periodontal Diseases/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Toothbrushing/methods
6.
J Marital Fam Ther ; 27(2): 251-60, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11314557

ABSTRACT

Legislation aimed at decreasing the divorce rate and the resurgence of interest in marriage and family enrichment have propelled educators to consider how well they are training new therapists in the preventive approaches to therapy. In this article, we present a graduate course to educate students about the enrichment movement and skill- and competency-based approaches to family intervention. We provide a general outline for teaching the course as well as specific resources and guidelines that can be of value to all marriage and family therapy practitioners.


Subject(s)
Curriculum , Education, Graduate , Family Therapy/education , Marital Therapy/education , Marriage/psychology , Humans
8.
J Marital Fam Ther ; 26(1): 39-45, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10685350

ABSTRACT

In this article, we provide examples of participatory qualitative evaluation methods that can be used within family therapy training programs. These methods can elicit useful feedback to improve programs and, at the same time, empower trainees to become partners in the evaluation process.


Subject(s)
Family Therapy/education , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Focus Groups , Humans , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...