Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 39(7): 548-550, 2023 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37276059

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: This case describes a 21-month-old girl who was transferred to our pediatric emergency department with daily fevers for 9 days and concern for intussusception on an ultrasound obtained at the outside hospital. Her examination was notable for diffuse tenderness to palpation with no rebound or guarding. Point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) revealed a noncompressible, target-shaped structure in the right midabdomen, which appeared to contain a dilated loop of bowel surrounded by a hypoechoic fluid collection. This was confirmed by radiology-performed ultrasound and computed tomography scan, which showed an ileocolic intussusception containing a dilated echogenic loop of bowel consistent with perforated acute appendicitis and associated abscess with surrounding inflammatory changes. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of perforated appendicitis within an intussusception identified on POCUS in a pediatric patient. This case demonstrates the utility of POCUS in facilitating the recognition of an atypical diagnosis of a perforated appendicitis contained within an intussusception and helping to guide further evaluation and management.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , Intussusception , Child , Female , Humans , Infant , Appendicitis/complications , Appendicitis/diagnostic imaging , Intussusception/diagnostic imaging , Point-of-Care Systems , Point-of-Care Testing , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography/methods
2.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(9): 442-447, 2022 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36040465

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy and interrater reliability of (1) point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) image interpretation for identification of intussusception and (2) reliability of secondary signs associated with intussusception among experts compared with novice POCUS reviewers. METHODS: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a prospective, convenience sample of children aged 3 months to 6 years who were evaluated with POCUS for intussusception across 17 international pediatric emergency departments between October 2018 and December 2020. A random sample of 100 POCUS examinations was reviewed by novice and expert POCUS reviewers. The primary outcome was identification of the presence or absence of intussusception. Secondary outcomes included intussusception size and the presence of trapped free fluid or echogenic foci. Accuracy was summarized using sensitivity and specificity, which were estimated via generalized mixed effects logistic regression. Interrater reliability was summarized via Light's κ statistics with bootstrapped standard errors (SEs). Accuracy and reliability of expert and novice POCUS reviewers were compared. RESULTS: Eighteen expert and 16 novice POCUS reviewers completed the reviews. The average expert sensitivity was 94.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.6-97.5), and the specificity was 94.3% (95% CI, 90.3-96.7), significantly higher than the average novice sensitivity of 84.7% (95% CI, 74.3-91.4) and specificity of 80.4% (95% CI, 72.4, 86.7). κ was significantly greater for expert (0.679, SE 0.039) compared with novice POCUS reviewers (0.424, SE 0.044; difference 0.256, SE 0.033). For our secondary outcome measure of intussusception size, κ was significantly greater for experts (0.661, SE 0.038) compared with novices (0.397, SE 0.041; difference 0.264, SE 0.029). Interrater reliability was weak for expert and minimal for novice reviewers regarding the detection of trapped free fluid and echogenic foci. CONCLUSIONS: Expert POCUS reviewers demonstrate high accuracy and moderate interrater reliability when identifying intussusception via image interpretation and perform better than novice reviewers.


Subject(s)
Intussusception , Point-of-Care Systems , Child , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Intussusception/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Ultrasonography/methods
3.
Acad Emerg Med ; 29(11): 1338-1346, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36043227

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) Point-of-care Ultrasound (POCUS) Network (P2Network) was established in 2014 to provide a platform for international collaboration among experts, including multicenter research. The objective of this study was to use expert consensus to identify and prioritize PEM POCUS topics, to inform future collaborative multicenter research. METHODS: Online surveys were administered in a two-stage, modified Delphi study. A steering committee of 16 PEM POCUS experts was identified within the P2Network, with representation from the United States, Canada, Italy, and Australia. We solicited the participation of international PEM POCUS experts through professional society mailing lists, research networks, social media, and "word of mouth." After each round, responses were refined by the steering committee before being reissued to participants to determine the ranking of all the research questions based on means and to identify the high-level consensus topics. The final stage was a modified Hanlon process of prioritization round (HPP), which emphasized relevance, impact, and feasibility. RESULTS: Fifty-four eligible participants (16.6%) provided 191 items to Survey 1 (Round 1). These were refined and consolidated into 52 research questions by the steering committee. These were issued for rating in Survey 2 (Round 2), which had 45 participants. At the completion of Round 2, all questions were ranked with six research questions reaching high-level consensus. Thirty-one research questions with mean ratings above neutral were selected for the HPP round. Highly ranked topics included clinical applications of POCUS to evaluate and manage children with shock, cardiac arrest, thoracoabdominal trauma, suspected cardiac failure, atraumatic limp, and intussusception. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus study has established a research agenda to inform future international multicenter PEM POCUS trials. This study has highlighted the ongoing need for high-quality evidence for PEM POCUS applications to guide clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Pediatric Emergency Medicine , Child , Humans , Delphi Technique , Point-of-Care Systems , Ultrasonography , Health Services Research
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(3): e222922, 2022 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35302632

ABSTRACT

Importance: The wide variation in the accuracy and reliability of the Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma (FAST) and the extended FAST (E-FAST) for children after blunt abdominal trauma reflects user expertise. FAST and E-FAST that are performed by experts tend to be more complete, better quality, and more often clinically valuable. Objective: To develop definitions of a complete, high-quality, and accurate interpretation for the FAST and E-FAST in children with injury using an expert, consensus-based modified Delphi technique. Design, Setting, and Participants: This consensus-based qualitative study was conducted between May 1 to June 30, 2021. It used a scoping review and iterative Delphi technique and involved 2 rounds of online surveys and a live webinar to achieve consensus among a 26-member panel. This panel consisted of international experts in pediatric emergency point-of-care ultrasonography. Main Outcomes and Measures: Definitions of complete, high-quality, and accurate FAST and E-FAST studies for children after injury. Results: Of the 29 invited pediatric FAST experts, 26 (15 men [58%]) agreed to participate in the panel. All 26 panelists completed the 2 rounds of surveys, and 24 (92%) participated in the live and asynchronous online discussions. Consensus was reached on FAST and E-FAST study definitions, and the panelists rated these 5 anatomic views as important and appropriate for a complete FAST: right upper-quadrant abdominal view, left upper-quadrant abdominal view, suprapubic views (transverse and sagittal), and subxiphoid cardiac view. For E-FAST, the same FAST anatomic views with the addition of the lung or pneumothorax view were deemed appropriate and important. In addition, the panelists rated a total of 32 landmarks as important for assessing completeness. Similarly, the panelists rated 14 statements on quality and 20 statements on accurate interpretation as appropriate. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study generated definitions for complete FAST and E-FAST studies with high image quality and accurate interpretation in children with injury. These definitions are similar to those in adults with injury and may be used for future education, quality assurance, and research. Future research may focus on interpretation of trace volumes of abdominal free fluid and the use of serial FAST.


Subject(s)
Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma , Child , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Ultrasonography
5.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(1): 40-42, 2022 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34986581

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: This case describes an 18-year-old woman who presented to the pediatric emergency department with 2 days of worsening right knee pain and swelling. The patient's history was remarkable for a motor vehicle accident 12 days before presentation, as well as recent treatment for a gonococcal sexually transmitted infection 9 days before presentation. Her examination was notable for a large area of fluctuance of her right knee without overlying erythema or appreciable intraarticular effusion. Point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) revealed a large, subcutaneous fluid collection containing multiple, mobile septations. This was confirmed by radiology ultrasound, and the patient was seen by an orthopedic surgeon who recommended conservative management without aspiration of the fluid collection. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a Morel-Lavallee lesion being diagnosed by POCUS in a pediatric patient. This case demonstrates the utility of POCUS in facilitating the prompt recognition of shear injuries in children and guiding management in the emergency department.


Subject(s)
Gonorrhea , Adolescent , Child , Edema , Female , Gonorrhea/complications , Gonorrhea/diagnosis , Gonorrhea/drug therapy , Humans , Point-of-Care Testing , Subcutaneous Tissue , Ultrasonography
6.
Ann Emerg Med ; 78(5): 606-615, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34226072

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by experienced clinician sonologists compared to radiology-performed ultrasound (RADUS) for detection of clinically important intussusception, defined as intussusception requiring radiographic or surgical reduction. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, observational study among a convenience sample of children aged 3 months to 6 years treated in tertiary care emergency departments across North and Central America, Europe, and Australia. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of POCUS and RADUS with respect to clinically important intussusception. Sample size was determined using a 4-percentage-point noninferiority margin for the absolute difference in accuracy. Secondary outcomes included agreement between POCUS and RADUS for identification of secondary sonographic findings. RESULTS: The analysis included 256 children across 17 sites (35 sonologists). Of the 256 children, 58 (22.7%) had clinically important intussusception. POCUS identified 60 (23.4%) children with clinically important intussusception. The diagnostic accuracy of POCUS was 97.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 94.9% to 99.0%), compared to 99.3% (95% CI 96.8% to 99.9%) for RADUS. The absolute difference between the accuracy of RADUS and that of POCUS was 1.5 percentage points (95% CI -0.6 to 3.6). Sensitivity for POCUS was 96.6% (95% CI 87.2% to 99.1%), and specificity was 98.0% (95% CI 94.7% to 99.2%). Agreement was high between POCUS and RADUS for identification of trapped free fluid (83.3%, n=40/48) and decreased color Doppler signal (95.7%, n=22/23). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS performed by experienced clinician sonologists may be noninferior to that of RADUS for detection of clinically important intussusception. Given the limitations of convenience sampling and spectrum bias, a larger randomized controlled trial is warranted.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine/standards , Intussusception/diagnostic imaging , Point-of-Care Testing/standards , Ultrasonography/standards , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Infant , Intussusception/therapy , Male , Prospective Studies
7.
Pediatr Emerg Med Pract ; 17(7): 1-16, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32559028

ABSTRACT

When pediatric patients require mechanical ventilation in the emergency department, the emergency clinician should be prepared to select initial ventilator settings and respond to an intubated patient's dynamic physiologic needs to ensure ongoing oxygenation, ventilation, and hemodynamic stability. Pressure-targeted ventilation is generally recommended in pediatric patients, with initial ventilator settings varying depending on age and the etiology of respiratory failure. This issue reviews indications for mechanical ventilation and offers recommendations for ventilator settings and dosing of analgesics, sedatives, and neuromuscular blockers, with a focus on patient populations in whom the approach to mechanical ventilation may be different.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiratory Tract Diseases/therapy , Adolescent , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Asthma/therapy , Child , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Hypoxia/therapy , Infant , Oxygen/analysis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Risk Management , Ventilators, Mechanical
9.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 35(10): 733-735, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31524822

ABSTRACT

This case describes a 3-year-old boy who was brought to the pediatric emergency department for evaluation of facial swelling. The patient's history was remarkable for a deep facial laceration 5 days prior that required surgical repair in the operating room. On the day of presentation, he was noted to have mild swelling and tenderness to palpation of the left jaw below the mandible, in the same location as his recent laceration repair. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) revealed a pseudoaneurysm with an arterial feeding vessel. This was confirmed by radiology-performed ultrasound, and the patient underwent a coil embolization procedure. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a pseudoaneurysm being diagnosed by POCUS in a pediatric patient. This case demonstrates the utility of POCUS in facilitating the timely recognition of vascular mass lesions and guiding management in the emergency department to avoid complications.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm, False/diagnostic imaging , Arteries/pathology , Face/blood supply , Point-of-Care Systems/standards , Aneurysm, False/therapy , Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Child, Preschool , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...