Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Epilepsia ; 51 Suppl 3: 93-7, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20618410

ABSTRACT

Brain stimulation is currently used as an experimental treatment for patients with medically refractory epilepsy. However, the results of such stimulation are still less than optimal. A major factor is the lack of understanding of the mechanisms of applied stimuli. Herein we review evidence on the effects of stimulation in models of epileptic seizures. We show that the effects of stimulation during epileptic seizures can differ from those observed under normal conditions. Several studies suggest a potentially greater beneficial therapeutic effect of strong depolarizing and overactivating stimulations than hyperpolarizing ones in the treatment of seizures. The potential relevance of these results to other therapeutic stimulation protocols is discussed.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Seizures/therapy , CA1 Region, Hippocampal/physiopathology , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Hippocampus/physiopathology , Humans , Seizures/physiopathology
2.
J Physiol ; 583(Pt 2): 555-65, 2007 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17599962

ABSTRACT

The sensitivity of brain tissue to weak extracellular electric fields is important in assessing potential public health risks of extremely low frequency (ELF) fields, and potential roles of endogenous fields in brain function. Here we determine the effect of applied electric fields on membrane potentials and coherent network oscillations. Applied DC electric fields change transmembrane potentials in CA3 pyramidal cell somata by 0.18 mV per V m(-1) applied. AC sinusoidal electric fields have smaller effects on transmembrane potentials: sensitivity drops as an exponential decay function of frequency. At 50 and 60 Hz it is approximately 0.4 that for DC fields. Effects of fields of < or = 16 V m(-1) peak-to-peak (p-p) did not outlast application. Kainic acid (100 nm) induced coherent network oscillations in the beta and gamma bands (15-100 Hz). Applied fields of > or = 6 V m(-1) p-p (2.1 V m(-1) r.m.s.) shifted the gamma peak in the power spectrum to centre on the applied field frequency or a subharmonic. Statistically significant effects on the timing of pyramidal cell firing within the oscillation appeared at distinct thresholds: at 50 Hz, 1 V m(-1) p-p (354 mV m(-1) r.m.s.) had statistically significant effects in 71% of slices, and 0.5 V m(-1) p-p (177 mV m(-1) r.m.s.) in 20%. These threshold fields are consistent with current environmental guidelines. They correspond to changes in somatic potential of approximately 70 microV, below membrane potential noise levels for neurons, demonstrating the emergent properties of neuronal networks can be more sensitive than measurable effects in single neurons.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields , Hippocampus/physiology , Pyramidal Cells/physiology , Animals , Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists/pharmacology , Fluorescent Dyes , Hippocampus/cytology , Hippocampus/drug effects , In Vitro Techniques , Kainic Acid/pharmacology , Male , Membrane Potentials , Microscopy, Fluorescence/methods , Oscillometry , Pyramidal Cells/drug effects , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Styrenes , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...