ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is commonly used during surgery of the spine and spinal cord for early surveillance of iatrogenic injury to the central and peripheral nervous system. However, for infants and young children under 3 years of age, the use of IONM is challenging due to incomplete central and peripheral myelination. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a T4-T6 dermal sinus tract (DST) that was resected on day of life 23, with the successful use of IONM. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the youngest reported case of the use of IONM in the surgical correction of a DST in a neonatal patient. This case demonstrates the potential efficacy of IONM in neonatal spine surgery and the techniques used to adapt the technology to an immature nervous system.
Subject(s)
Fistula , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring , Spina Bifida Occulta , Child , Child, Preschool , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring/methods , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Spina Bifida Occulta/diagnostic imaging , Spina Bifida Occulta/surgery , SpineABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine how much money patients are willing to pay to avoid postoperative muscle pains associated with succinylcholine. DESIGN: Observational study with survey instrument. SETTING: University-affiliated metropolitan hospital. PATIENTS: Eighty-eight adult patients, 43 men and 45 women, who were scheduled to undergo surgery with general anesthesia and who completed a preoperative questionnaire (median age range, 41-50 y; median income, US$45,000-60,000). INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: Patients completed a computerized, interactive questionnaire preoperatively. They were asked about demographics and previous experiences with muscle pain and postoperative myalgia. With the use of the willingness-to-pay model, the value that they would be willing to pay for a hypothetical muscle relaxant that avoided postoperative myalgia was determined. MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent of patients considered avoiding postoperative myalgia as important. Patients were willing to pay a median (interquartile range) of $33 ($19-$50) out of pocket for a muscle relaxant that was not associated with postoperative myalgia, a figure that increased to $40 if the insurance company paid for the drug (P < 0.0001). Willingness to pay was influenced by patients' income but not by prior experience with postoperative myalgia. CONCLUSION: Patients consider avoidance of postoperative myalgia important and are willing to pay $33 out of pocket for a muscle relaxant that is not associated with this side effect.
