ABSTRACT
The aims of this study were to retrospectively assess the occurrence of complications or need for secondary wrist procedures after the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure, and to prospectively assess patient-reported outcomes at long-term follow-up. All patients treated with the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure in our tertiary referral hospital between January 2008 and September 2021 were identified and contacted to complete the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation outcome measures. In total, 30 patients, with a median follow-up of 82 months, were included in this study. Complications occurred in 6 of 30 patients, which resulted in six secondary wrist procedures. Mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation scores were 30.1 and 33.6, respectively. We conclude that in respect of long-term outcomes, the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure can still be deemed to be a useful procedure, especially in patients with few other reconstructive options.Level of evidence: IV.
ABSTRACT
Current management guidelines for ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (aTAA) recommend intervention once ascending or sinus diameter reaches 5-5.5 cm or shows a growth rate of >0.5 cm/year estimated from echo/CT/MRI. However, many aTAA dissections (aTAAD) occur in vessels with diameters below the surgical intervention threshold of <55 mm. Moreover, during aTAA repair surgeons observe and experience considerable variations in tissue strength, thickness, and stiffness that appear not fully explained by patient risk factors. To improve the understanding of aTAA pathophysiology, we established a multi-disciplinary research infrastructure: The Maastricht acquisition platform for studying mechanisms of tissue-cell crosstalk (MAPEX). The explicit scientific focus of the platform is on the dynamic interactions between vascular smooth muscle cells and extracellular matrix (i.e., cell-matrix crosstalk), which play an essential role in aortic wall mechanical homeostasis. Accordingly, we consider pathophysiological influences of wall shear stress, wall stress, and smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity and modulation. Co-registrations of hemodynamics and deep phenotyping at the histological and cell biology level are key innovations of our platform and are critical for understanding aneurysm formation and dissection at a fundamental level. The MAPEX platform enables the interpretation of the data in a well-defined clinical context and therefore has real potential for narrowing existing knowledge gaps. A better understanding of aortic mechanical homeostasis and its derangement may ultimately improve diagnostic and prognostic possibilities to identify and treat symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with existing and developing aneurysms.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm is a chronic degenerative pathology characterized by dilatation of this segment of the aorta. Clinical guidelines use aortic diameter and growth rate as predictors of rupture and dissection. However, these guidelines neglect the effects of tissue remodeling, which may affect wall thickness. The present study aims to systematically review observational studies to examine to what extent wall thickness is considered and measured in clinical practice. METHODS: Using PubMed and Web of Science, studies were identified with data on ascending aortic wall thickness, morphology, aortic diameter, and measurement techniques. RESULTS: 15 included studies report several methods by which wall thickness is measured. No association was observed between wall thickness and aortic diameter across included studies. Wall thickness values appear not materially different between aneurysmatic aortas and non-aneurysmal aortas. CONCLUSIONS: The effects on and consequences of wall thickness changes during ATAA formation are ill-defined. Wall thickness values for aneurysmatic aortas can be similar to aortas with normal diameters. Given the existing notion that wall thickness is a determinant of mechanical stress homeostasis, our review exposes a clear need for consistent as well as clinically applicable methods and studies to quantify wall thickness in ascending aortic aneurysm research.
