Safety of an amino-acetonitrile derivative (AAD), monepantel, in ewes and their offspring following repeated oral administration.

AIM: To demonstrate the clinical and reproductive safety in ewes and their offspring of repetitive oral doses of monepantel, an amino-acetonitrile derivative (AAD), when administered at three times the proposed maximum recommended dose (MRD) over an entire reproductive cycle. METHODS: A randomised controlled blinded study design was used. One hundred and twelve primi- or multi-parous ewes and 28 rams were randomly allocated into control and treated groups (n=56 for groups of ewes, n=14 for groups of rams). Two control ewes and two treated ewes were randomly selected to form 28 subgroups. A control or treated ram was then randomly allocated to each subgroup, to form control ram/treated ewe, control ram/control ewe, treated ram/treated ewe, and treated ram/control ewe 'treatment/mating' units. Control animals were treated with saline, and treated animals given three times the MRD (11.25 mg/kg) of monepantel. Treatments were administered orally every 5 days during an entire reproductive cycle, including oestrus and mating, gestation, and post-lambing to weaning. Detailed recording at multiple time points were made of veterinary examinations; observations for adverse events; bodyweight measurements; faecal scores; and haematology, clinical chemistry and coagulation variables. Reproductive indices determined included percent pregnant, number of failed embryos, abortion percentage, number of lambs with teratogenic defects, length of gestation, percentage of stillbirths, number of ewes experiencing reproductive problems, lambing percentage, and pre-weaning mortality. Post-mortem examination, including measurement of organ weights, was performed on randomly selected ewes (n=40) and lambs (n=40) at the completion of the study. RESULTS: All ewes treated with monepantel and those in the control group thrived and behaved normally to the end of the study. No treatment-related, toxicologically relevant adverse events, clinical observations or gross post-mortem changes were observed. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in bodyweight or organ weights, and haematological, clinical chemistry or coagulation variables between ewes treated with monepantel and control ewes. No significant differences were observed in any of the reproductive indices measured. No significant clinical differences were noted between lambs born from treated ewes and those from controls. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Repeated oral administration of monepantel at three times the MRD every 5 days over an entire reproductive cycle was not associated with any treatment-related adverse effects on the reproductive performance of ewes nor on the viability of their offspring, and was systemically very well tolerated. This study demonstrated that this population of ewes could tolerate accidental overdoses of up to three times the MRD of monepantel or prolonged repetitive administration of overdoses. Thus, those so treated entering a breeding programme would have normal reproductive indices, mating behaviour, and health, and their lambs would suffer no ill effects.

Reproductive safety of an amino-acetonitrile derivative (AAD), monepantel, in rams following repeated oral administration.

AIM: To demonstrate the clinical and reproductive safety in rams of repetitive oral doses of monepantel, an amino-acetonitrile derivative (AAD), when administered at three times the proposed maximum recommended dose (MRD) over an entire spermatogenic cycle and during mating with ewes. METHODS: A randomised controlled blinded study design was used with 28 rams randomly divided into two groups. The control group was treated with saline, and the other group was given three times the MRD (11.25 mg/kg) of monepantel. Treatments were administered orally every 5 days, for 100 days, during an entire spermatogenic cycle and subsequent mating period. Detailed recording at multiple time points were made of veterinary examinations; observations for adverse events; bodyweight measurements; faecal scores; haematology, clinical chemistry and coagulation variables; semen indices; evaluation of serving capacity; and gross pathology (including measurement of organ weights) performed on 10 rams from each group at the completion of the study. RESULTS: All rams treated with monepantel and those in the control group thrived and behaved normally to the end of the study. No treatment-related, toxicologically relevant adverse events, clinical observations or macroscopic changes were observed. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in bodyweight or organ weights, and haematological, clinical chemistry or coagulation variables between rams treated with monepantel and control rams. No significant changes were observed in any semen variable measured in any rams, and the serving capacity of rams mated to ewes was unaffected. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Repeated oral administration of monepantel at three times the MRD every 5 days over an entire spermatogenic cycle and during mating was not associated with any treatment-related adverse effects on the reproductive performance of rams and was systemically very well tolerated. This study demonstrated that this population of rams could tolerate accidental overdoses of up to three times the MRD of monepantel or prolonged repetitive administration at overdoses. Thus, those so treated entering a breeding programme would have normal sperm indices, mating behaviour, and health.

[Mycobacteriosis in sea mammals and birds]. / Micobacteriosis en mamíferos y aves marinas.

Different diagnostic techniques for mycobacteria were studied in sea lions, sea elephants, fur seals, dolphins, killer whales and penguins from a sea aquarium. Three strains were isolated from fur seals. Two were classified as Mycobacterium chelonae and one as Mycobacterium fortuitum complex. There was good correlation between the results given by the intradermal tuberculin test and ELISA, but the former is recommended as a screening test on the basis of its practicality. Results and methodology of the different techniques are described.

Synchronization of estrus in beef heifers with a norgestomet implant and prostaglandin F2alpha.

In a 5-year study (1973-1977), 281 cycling beef heifers were treated with a 7-day norgestomet (SC21009) ear implant and an intramuscular injection of prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) at the time of implant removal or 24 hr before implant removal. Percentages of heifers in estrus by 36, 48, 60, 72, and 120 hr after implant removal were 32.4, 52.7, 71.6, 80.1, and 93.2, respectively. Onset of estrus occurred an average of 49.8 +/- 4.7 hr after treatment. Percentages of heifers in estrus 36 hr after treatment were 5.7 and 51.7 for those with a corpus luteum and those without a corpus luteum (or determined regressing by palpation) at implant removal, respectively. When PGF(2alpha) was injected 24 hr before implant removal, 55% of the heifers were in estrus by 36 hr after implant removal compared to 30% when PGF(2alpha) was injected at the time of implant removal; however, by 60 hr after implant removal the difference was 76% vs. 71%. First-service conception rates for synchronized and nonsynchronized heifers were 62.2% and 59.6%, respectively. During 1976 and 1977 heifers were checked for estrus every 4 hr and inseminated 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, or 30 hr after first detected to be in standing estrus. Conception rate was not significantly affected by time of insemination but tended to be higher for heifers bred 26 and 30 hr after first being detected in standing estrus (78.9% and 70.0% vs. average 59.2%). Treatment with a 7-day norgestomet implant plus a single injection of PGF(2alpha) 24 hr before or at implant removal appears to be a practical technique for synchronizing estrus in cycling heifers without affecting conception.