Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Presse Med ; 32(38): 1797-801, 2003 Nov 29.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14663380

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since July 26, 2001, the external reporting to the regional office of health and social affairs (Direction départementale des affaires sanitaires et sociales--Ddass) and the coordination centre (Comité de lutte contre les infections nosocomiales--Cclin) for the fight against nosocomial infections (NI) is mandatory. However, the modalities of internal reporting to the Clin are unknown. METHOD: We performed a retrospective analysis of 108 cases of NI reported over 23 months in 4 medical-surgical departments (MSD) with 14 to 35 NI reported/MSD. The distribution of the bacteria responsible was compared with that of the local epidemiological state (chi2 test). A correlation analysis was performed between the number of NI reported in each MSD and the structural characteristics and activity index of these MSD (Spearmann's correlation test). RESULTS: The NI were predominantly infections related to a catheter (43), lower respiratory tract (25) and infection of the site of surgery (19). Ninety were documented biologically, among which 10 implied multi-resistant bacteria. Ninety-four NI were associated with the prescription of an antibiotic. Compared with the local epidemiological state, the NI reported generally implied multi-resistant bacteria (p=0.009). The other microbiological data had little implication. In each of the MSD, the number of cases reported was independent of: the global activity, the number of interventions, the mean duration of hospitalisation, the number of beds, the number of clinicians, the number of new patients managed and the chemotherapy outpatient activity. Conversely, there was a strong correlation between the global consumption of antibiotics (r=0.78), and the number of the Clin members in each MSD DMC (r=0.82). CONCLUSION: In each MSD, the internal reporting of NI relies on the discovery of multi-resistant bacteria, but above all on the implication of those involved in the fight against nosocomial infections.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Disease Notification/standards , Infection Control/standards , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/etiology , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/etiology , Disease Notification/methods , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , France/epidemiology , Hospital Bed Capacity/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Infection Control/methods , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Population Surveillance/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Statistics, Nonparametric
3.
Presse Med ; 29(35): 1927-32, 2000 Nov 18.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11244620

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In order to evaluate occurrence and risk factors for wound infection (WI) in breast cancer surgery, we carried out a prospective study. METHODS: From September 1996 through April 1997, an infection control physician prospectively evaluated 542 wounds of all patients having breast cancer surgery at the Oscar Lambret Cancer Center. WI was defined as a wound with pus. Antibiotic prophylaxis was given in case of immediate breast reconstruction. Statistical evaluation was performed using the c < or = test for categorial data and non-parametric Mann-Whitney test for continuous data. In univariate analysis, differences were considered significant at p < 0.01. RESULTS: The overall WI rate was 3.51% (19/352). In univariate analysis, risk factors for WI were: total preoperative hospital stay (p = 0.01), previous chemotherapy (p = 0.01), previous oncologic surgery (p = 0.03) and immediate breast reconstruction (p = 0.002). In mutivariate analysis, we observed two independent predictive factors for WI: previous chemotherapy (p = 0.05) and immediate breast reconstruction (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Previous anticancer chemotherapy was a major risk factor. In these cases, a phase III trial could confirm efficacy of standard antibiotic prophylaxis. Breast reconstruction was the second major risk factor. Standard antibiotic prophylaxis (used in our study) was insufficient.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mastectomy/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infection Control , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Mastectomy/methods , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL