Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Orthop Traumatol ; 25(1): 37, 2024 Jul 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39048851

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to quantify the prophylactic effect of high-dose gentamicin and clindamycin antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) during revision total hip (rTHA) or knee (rTKA) arthroplasty for aseptic reasons. The hypothesis was that the raw surgical site infection (SSI) rate is lower when this particular cement is used in comparison with cement loaded with standard-dose gentamicin during rTHA or rTKA for aseptic reasons. METHODS: This retrospective study included 290 consecutive patients undergoing aseptic rTHA or rTKA. Two consecutive cohorts were defined: the first (control group) involved 145 patients where ALBC with gentamicin only was used; the second (study group) involved 145 patients where ALBC with high-dose gentamicin and clindamycin was used. The primary endpoint was the raw SSI rate after 24 months. RESULTS: The raw SSI rate was 8/145 (6%) in the control group and 13/145 (9%) in the study group (odds ratio 0.62, p = 0.26). There was a significant impact of the presence of any risk factor on the SSI rate (15/100 versus 6/169, odds ratio = 4.25, p = 0.002), but no significant impact of any individual risk factor. No complication or side effect related to ALBC was observed in either group. CONCLUSION: These results do not support the routine use of gentamicin and clindamycin ALBC for fixation of revision implants after rTHA and rTKA for aseptic reasons.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Bone Cements , Clindamycin , Gentamicins , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Reoperation , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Gentamicins/administration & dosage , Clindamycin/administration & dosage , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Risk Factors
2.
J Hand Surg Glob Online ; 5(5): 650-654, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37790827

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) is gaining popularity among clinicians. Although its use for procedural guidance could have several advantages in hand surgery, other surgeons may wonder about its added benefits. This cadaveric study aimed to examine the hypothesis of increased accuracy of wireless HHUS-guided injections versus that of blind injections into the flexor sheath. Methods: Our series included 20 fresh cadaveric hands with 80 fingers randomly assigned to 2 groups. In group A, 10 hands were randomly assigned to receive a landmark injection and then received a blinded injection to the flexor tendon sheath (FTS). In group B, 10 hands were blinded in the same manner and received an ultrasound-guided injection with HHUS. Methylene blue was injected, and anatomic dissection was performed to evaluate the injection accuracy based on the dye's filling pattern in the FTS as stage I (no filling), stage II (<50% filling), and stage III (>50% filling). Statistical analysis was performed, and P <.05 indicated a significant difference. Results: One finger was excluded because of severe Dupuytren contracture. In group A, 39 blind injections of the FTS were performed, with 82% (32/39) fingers achieving stage III filling. In group B, 40 ultrasound-guided FTS injections were performed, with 90% (36/40) of fingers achieving stage III filing. Our study did not reveal any superiority in accuracy when ultrasound guidance was used (P = .35). Conclusions: Hand-held ultrasound-guided FTS injections were not more accurate than blind injections performed by an experienced hand surgeon. These findings suggest that blind injections can be used as routine practice when performed by experienced operators to treat trigger finger. However, the use of HHUS may offer other advantages in hand surgery practice. Clinical relevance: Ultimately, choosing to perform HHUS-guided injection versus blind injection to treat trigger finger depends on the surgeon's experience and preference for a particular technique.

3.
Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg ; 10(1): 2251581, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37655127

ABSTRACT

We report the case of a HIV-seronegative 57 year-old man, with known classic Kaposi's disease and in whom a secondary localization in the upper left limb led to carpal and metacarpal lysis in the left hand. This unfavorable local evolution led to left transhumeral amputation.

4.
Cureus ; 15(9): e45779, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37745743

ABSTRACT

Background Symptomatic trapeziometacarpal osteoarthrosis can be treated with an ultrasound-guided injection in the early stages. This cadaveric study aimed to assess the hypothesis suggesting enhanced accuracy and reliability of hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) injections compared to blind injections into the trapeziometacarpal joint (TMC). Materials and method Our series included 20 fresh cadaveric hands, with a total of 20 TMC randomly assigned to two groups. In group A, 10 TMC received a blinded injection, and in group B, 10 TMC received an ultrasound-guided injection with HHUS. Methylene blue was injected, and anatomical dissection was performed to assess the intra-articular location of the dye. The injection was considered accurate if the intra-articular synovial fluid was stained after opening the articular capsule on the dorsal approach. If there was no injection, it was inaccurate. A statistical analysis was performed, and p <.05 indicated a significant difference. Results Two thumbs were excluded during the study due to an existing trapeziectomy. In group A, 10 blind injections of TMC were performed, with 70% (7/10) of injections graded as accurate. In group B, eight ultrasound-guided injections were performed, with 75% (6/8) achieving accuracy. A Fisher's exact test was performed, and the results indicated no statistically significant difference in injection accuracy between the two groups (P = 1, odds ratio = 0.788). Conclusion Hand-held ultrasound guided TMC injections were not more accurate than blind injections performed by an experienced hand surgeon. Nonetheless, additional studies with a larger sample and comparative studies with conventional cart-based machines are necessary to evaluate the potential of this newly accessible device.

5.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2023(2): rjad027, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36751671

ABSTRACT

Superficial acral fibromyxoma (SAFM) is a rare, benign, slow-growing fibroblastic tumour of the soft tissue that is part of the group of myxoid soft-tissue neoplasms. It is a rare entity and usually occurs in the acral regions. We report the case of a 64-year-old man who presented to the emergency room for a lesion expected to have occurred as a result of an ingrown toenail. Because this patient had a history of repeated recurrences despite multiple surgical wedge excisions, we performed a complete surgical excision, and the pathological analysis confirmed the suspected diagnosis of SAFM. There was no recurrence at the 6-month follow-up. This case highlights the fact that this tumour is still misunderstood and underrecognized by surgeons and this often leads to delayed diagnosis. Although it is a rare entity, clinicians should be aware of this tumour in cases of recurring ingrown toenails.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...