Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Cancer Radiother ; 26(6-7): 851-857, 2022 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36055909

ABSTRACT

The incidence of primary hepatic tumours is increasing and the reference treatments by liver transplantation or surgical resection do not allow to compensate for this increase because of the lack of grafts, or the low proportion of initially resectable tumours. The challenges for radiotherapy of primary liver tumors are multiple: physical, biological, medical and technological. Liver stereotactic body radiotherapy is sometimes the only local treatment option and is progressively finding its place for these tumors, even if the recognition of the indications would deserve a better standardization of international recommendations. The heterogeneity of practices and techniques is a major obstacle to the development of randomized studies, despite the excellent oncological results published. The latest ASTRO 2022 guidelines, the recent publication of the guidelines from the French society for radiation oncology on external radiotherapy and brachytherapy procedures ("RecoRad™ 2.0"), and the inclusion in prospective clinical trials will help to homogenize protocols and improve recognition of the technique. The first data from the new techniques of adaptive radiotherapy and MR-guided radiotherapy, whose objectives are to improve targeting and reduce liver or gastrointestinal toxicity, confirm the excellent results of liver SBRT and allow the potential indications to be extended to locations that were previously difficult to treat.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Liver Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Prospective Studies , Radiosurgery/methods
2.
Cancer Radiother ; 23(6-7): 636-650, 2019 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31444078

ABSTRACT

Liver stereotactic body radiotherapy is a developing technique for the treatment of primary tumours and metastases. Its implementation is complex because of the particularities of the treated organ and the comorbidities of the patients. However, this technique is a treatment opportunity for patients otherwise in therapeutic impasse. The scientific evidence of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy has been considered by the French health authority as insufficient for its widespread use outside specialized and experienced centers, despite a growing and important number of retrospective and prospective studies, but few comparative data. This article focuses on the specific features of stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver treatments and the results of published studies of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy performed with classic linear accelerators and dedicated radiosurgery units.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/radiotherapy , Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Liver/radiation effects , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Organ Motion , Particle Accelerators , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiation Tolerance , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/methods , Respiration , Treatment Outcome
3.
Radiother Oncol ; 34(2): 160-3, 1995 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7597215

ABSTRACT

We treated 31 soft tissue sarcoma bearing patients with intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) with ages ranging from 26 to 71: first curative intent treatment, 16 patients; and recurrent tumors, 15 patients. The tumor site was the pelvis and the retroperitoneal spaces in 13 patients and the limbs or the trunk in 18 patients. The histological type was: malignant histiocytofibroma, 14 patients; liposarcomas, 10 patients; malignant schwanoma, 1 patient; leiomyosarcoma, 2 patients; hemangiopericytoma, 1 patient; embryonic rhabdomyosarcoma, 2 patients; and synovialosarcoma, 1 patient. All the patients were diagnosed without any distant metastatic evolution at the moment of the treatment. All the patients except one underwent a complete surgical excision without any gross residual disease and received an intraoperative radiation single dose of 10 Gy in one case, 12.5 Gy in one case, 13 Gy in one case, 15 Gy in 17 cases, 18 Gy in three cases, 20 Gy in seven cases and 25 Gy in one case. Thereafter the treatment was completed by a postoperative X-ray dose of 45-50 Gy in 4.5-5 weeks for 16 patients. Local control (LC) was obtained in 27 out of 31 patients (87%), with a minimal follow-up duration of 2 years. Eleven out of 31 patients died: seven with local control (one from an intercurrent disease, six from distant metastasis) and four with local failure inside the IORT fields. Twenty patients are alive with no evolutive disease in 19 cases and with a distant metastasis in one case.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Intraoperative Care , Radiology, Interventional , Sarcoma/radiotherapy , Sarcoma/surgery , Abdominal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Abdominal Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Disease-Free Survival , Extremities/radiation effects , Extremities/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Liposarcoma/radiotherapy , Liposarcoma/surgery , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Pelvic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pelvic Neoplasms/surgery , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, High-Energy , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Sarcoma/secondary , Survival Rate , Thoracic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Thoracic Neoplasms/surgery
5.
Bull Cancer Radiother ; 81(3): 196-205, 1994.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7702903

ABSTRACT

The present study concerns 140 patients with loco-regional prostatic cancer, treated with external beam irradiation at the CRLC Val-d'Aurelle in Montpellier, France, between 1982 and 1988, with a minimum of 54 months follow-up. The local control after radiotherapy is 78.6%, all stages and histological grades combined. The median overall survival is 114 months and the median disease-free survival 59 months. The most frequent modality of treatment failure is metastatic disease, isolated (32.8%) or combined to local relapse (10%). The rate of urinary intolerance symptoms during treatment was 87.1 and 80.6% for the digestive ones. The late urinary complications and sequellae rate was 21.4% for the cystitis-type and 12.9% for post-radiotherapy urethral strictures; the latter has imposed in 2/3 of cases one or more trans-urethral resections that never showed pathological signs of recurrence. Digestive complications and sequellae occurred in 31.3% of the patients; in the latter group there were two internal digestive fistulae which needed surgical treatment and three postradiotherapeutic stenosis of the anal canal. The prognostic factors revealed by statistical analysis are clinical stage, pathological grade for overall and disease-free survival, age for overall survival and trans-urethral resection for disease-free survival, the latter being equally a risk factor for cystitis-type complications and urethral strictures.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...