Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 20(8): 420-431, 2021 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34357889

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Selected Issues in Sport-Related Concussion (SRC | Mild Traumatic Brain Injury) for the Team Physician: A Consensus Statement is title 22 in a series of annual consensus articles written for the practicing team physician. This document provides an overview of select medical issues important to team physicians who are responsible for athletes with sports-related concussion (SRC). This statement was developed by the Team Physician Consensus Conference (TPCC), an annual project-based alliance of six major professional associations. The goal of this TPCC statement is to assist the team physician in providing optimal medical care for the athlete with SRC.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Brain Concussion , Physicians , Sports Medicine , Sports , Athletes , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/therapy , Consensus , Humans
2.
Br J Sports Med ; 55(22): 1251-1261, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34134974

ABSTRACT

Selected Issues in Sport-Related Concussion (SRC|Mild Traumatic Brain Injury) for the Team Physician: A Consensus Statement is title 22 in a series of annual consensus documents written for the practicing team physician. This document provides an overview of selected medical issues important to team physicians who are responsible for athletes with sports-related concussion (SRC). This statement was developed by the Team Physician Consensus Conference (TPCC), an annual project-based alliance of six major professional associations. The goal of this TPCC statement is to assist the team physician in providing optimal medical care for the athlete with SRC.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Brain Concussion , Physicians , Sports Medicine , Sports , Athletes , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/therapy , Humans
3.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 26(4 Suppl): S76-91, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26617382

ABSTRACT

Children, older adults, disabled and special needs athletes, and female athletes who participate in outdoor and wilderness sports and activities each face unique risks. For children and adolescents traveling to high altitude, the preparticipation physical evaluation should focus on risk assessment, prevention strategies, early recognition of altitude-related symptoms, management plans, and appropriate follow-up. As the risk and prevalence of chronic disease increases with age, both older patients and providers need to be aware of disease and medication-specific risks relative to wilderness sport and activity participation. Disabled and special needs athletes benefit from careful pre-event planning for the potential medical issues and equipment modifications that may affect their health in wilderness environments. Issues that demand special consideration for female adventurers include pregnancy, contraceptive use, menses, and ferritin levels at altitude. A careful preparticipation evaluation that factors in unique, population- specific risks will help special populations stay healthy and safe on wilderness adventures. The PubMed and SportDiscus databases were searched in 2014 using both MeSH terms and text words and include peer-reviewed English language articles from 1977 to 2014. Additional information was accessed from Web-based sources to produce this narrative review on preparticipation evaluation for special populations undertaking wilderness adventures. Key words include children, adolescent, pediatric, seniors, elderly, disabled, special needs, female, athlete, preparticipiation examination, wilderness medicine, and sports.


Subject(s)
Environment , Medical History Taking/methods , Physical Examination/methods , Wilderness , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aging/physiology , Altitude Sickness/complications , Altitude Sickness/epidemiology , Altitude Sickness/prevention & control , Athletes , Child , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Disabled Persons , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sports , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology
4.
Clin J Sport Med ; 25(5): 443-55, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26340738

ABSTRACT

Children, older adults, disabled and special needs athletes, and female athletes who participate in outdoor and wilderness sports and activities each face unique risks. For children and adolescents traveling to high altitude, the preparticipation physical evaluation should focus on risk assessment, prevention strategies, early recognition of altitude-related symptoms, management plans, and appropriate follow-up. As the risk and prevalence of chronic disease increases with age, both older patients and providers need to be aware of disease and medication-specific risks relative to wilderness sport and activity participation. Disabled and special needs athletes benefit from careful pre-event planning for the potential medical issues and equipment modifications that may affect their health in wilderness environments. Issues that demand special consideration for female adventurers include pregnancy, contraceptive use, menses, and ferritin levels at altitude. A careful preparticipation evaluation that factors in unique, population-specific risks will help special populations stay healthy and safe on wilderness adventures. The PubMed and SportDiscus databases were searched in 2014 using both MeSH terms and text words and include peer-reviewed English language articles from 1977 to 2014. Additional information was accessed from Web-based sources to produce this narrative review on preparticipation evaluation for special populations undertaking wilderness adventures. Key words include children, adolescent, pediatric, seniors, elderly, disabled, special needs, female, athlete, preparticipiation examination, wilderness medicine, and sports.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons , Physical Examination/methods , Wilderness , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Athletes , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Wilderness Medicine , Young Adult
5.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 6(1): 16-9, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17212907

ABSTRACT

The cervical spine is prone to injury due to the structure of the articulating vertebrae at the level of C4-C6, where the spinal cord occupies more of the spinal canal. Cervical spine injuries can occur in all sports and all ages. Participation in contact sports certainly increases the possibility of cervical spine injuries. In screening for catastrophic neck injuries it is vital to examine incidence and injury surveillance statistics in sports. These data can help determine sport-specific preponderance of catastrophic injury. Screening methods for predisposition to catastrophic cervical spine injuries include a concise history, physical examination, and radiographic methods. There is currently no universal classification system utilizing imaging of the cervical spine that has been validated as a screening method for catastrophic neck injuries.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Football/injuries , Mass Screening/methods , Spinal Cord Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries , Catastrophic Illness/therapy , Head Protective Devices/standards , Humans , Neck Injuries/diagnosis , Neck Injuries/therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Sports , Sports Equipment/standards
6.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 1(1): 35-42, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12831645

ABSTRACT

Many factors contribute to intervertebral disc problems; anatomic, physiologic, and mechanical factors are considered in the literature. Disc pathology as the cause of back or neck pain in the athletic population is primarily seen in acute disc injury. The research connecting degenerative disc disease as a precursor to acute disc injury is limited in scope. The research in discogenic etiology of back and neck injuries in the athletic population is also small in number, therefore resulting in limited information supporting the nonoperative versus operative treatment of disc injury. Treatment convention tends to be a conservative, nonoperative approach. Conservative treatment generally includes three phases: acute (palliative), rehabilitative, and maintenance. The operative approach has received more prospective research, but similar functional outcomes as the nonoperative approach for the majority of disc injuries. Treatment options are discussed, in addition to a brief overview of the biochemical and biomechanical environment of disc injury.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/therapy , Spinal Diseases/therapy , Athletic Injuries/surgery , Diskectomy , Exercise Therapy , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/therapy , Muscle, Skeletal/anatomy & histology , Recovery of Function , Spinal Diseases/surgery , Spine/anatomy & histology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...