Mastectomy Incision Design to Optimize Aesthetic Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Choosing the optimal mastectomy incision must account for oncologic, reconstructive, and aesthetic considerations, including nipple preservation, mastectomy skin margins and potential for skin involvement, mastectomy skin perfusion and viability, mastectomy skin excess, previous breast scars, the reconstructive plan, and inconspicuous new scar placement. In the present study, we aimed to assess breast reconstruction aesthetics, as they are influenced by mastectomy incision design. METHODS: Nine commonly utilized mastectomy incision patterns were grouped into 3 categories: hidden scar, vertical scar, and transverse scar. Twenty plastic surgeons were asked to blindly grade before and after photographs of reconstructed breasts with regard to scar visibility and position and according to their influence on breast aesthetics. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed between the study groups. Mastectomies and reconstructions performed through hidden incisions yield the most aesthetic results. Vertical scars are favorable to transverse scars. In the case of bilateral reconstructions, symmetric scar placement is paramount to optimizing aesthetic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The mastectomy incision pattern significantly affects the aesthetic outcomes in breast reconstruction. Patterns borrowed from cosmetic breast surgery consistently yield highly aesthetic outcomes. Surgeons must consider oncologic factors and patient characteristics in choosing an ideal incision for each patient.

Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Reconstruction for Breast Burn Deformities.

The anterior chest wall is commonly involved in pediatric burn injuries. In women, deep thermal injuries may result in damage to the breast bud and breast skin, which can disrupt breast development and result in long-term deformities. In adulthood, the techniques frequently applied to correct these deformities focus on scar release in combination with skin grafting and implant-based procedures; however, these techniques often result in suboptimal aesthetic outcomes. In this report, we present superior outcomes from applying an autologous breast reconstruction technique to this challenging problem.

The rate of incidental atypical and malignant breast lesions in reduction mammoplasty specimens.

AIMS: Reduction mammoplasty (RM) is one of the most common plastic surgeries in the United States. We aimed to demonstrate the rate of incidental atypical and malignant breast lesions (AMBL) found in RM specimens and the impact of the number of submitted tissue sections on the rate of AMBL. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed our database for patients who had undergone reduction mammoplasty between 2000 and 2018. Patients with a history of breast cancer were excluded from the study. All pathology reports were analysed for AMBL (ALH, LCIS, FEA, ADH, DCIS, invasive carcinoma). The grossing protocol was to submit 10 sections from each breast between 2000 and 2013 and six sections between 2014 and 2018. One hundred and sixty-nine of 5208 patients (3.3%) and 216 of 10 340 RM specimens (2.1%) showed at least one AMBL. Nineteen (0.36%) patients had incidental cancer. The median age of patients with AMBL was significantly higher than patients without ABL (aged 59 years versus 45 years). There was no cancer in patients aged <30 years. The age-controlled rate of overall AMBL as well as atypia and cancer only did not decrease by submitting fewer sections during the 2014-18 period compared to the 2010-13 period. CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing the number of tissue sections from 10 to six did not lead to a significant decrease in the rate of overall AMBL or cancer. Our data suggest that submitting six tissue sections from each breast for patients aged >30 years and two sections from each breast for patients aged <30 years would be sufficient.

The Timing of Chemoprophylaxis in Autologous Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction are at high risk of perioperative venous thromboembolic events. The efficacy of chemoprophylaxis in decreasing venous thromboembolic events is well established, but the timing of chemoprophylaxis remains controversial. The authors compare the incidence of bleeding following preoperative versus postoperative initiation of chemoprophylaxis in microvascular breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed from August of 2010 to July of 2016. Initiation of chemoprophylaxis changed from postoperative to preoperative in 2013, dividing subjects into two groups. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and complications were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients (311 flaps) were included in the study. A total of 105 patients (166 flaps) received preoperative enoxaparin (40 mg) and 91 patients (145 flaps) received postoperative chemoprophylaxis. A total of five patients required hematoma evacuation (2.6 percent). Of these, one hematoma (1 percent) occurred in the preoperative chemoprophylaxis group. Seven patients received blood transfusions: three in the preoperative group and four in the postoperative group (2.9 percent versus 4.4 percent; p = 0.419). There was a total of one flap failure, and there were no documented venous thromboembolic events in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that preoperative chemoprophylaxis can be used safely in patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction. The higher rate of bleeding in the postoperative group may be related to the onset of action of enoxaparin of 4 to 6 hours, which allows for intraoperative hemostasis in the preoperative group and possibly potentiating postoperative oozing when administered postoperatively. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Scarless Breast Reconstruction: Indications and Techniques for Optimizing Aesthetic Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Breast reconstruction that leaves no visible scars on the breast is possible for a subset of patients. This article reviews a cohort of 10 patients who underwent 14 autologous breast reconstructions. To achieve a reconstruction without visible breast scars, the mastectomy and autologous reconstruction are carried out through a periareolar incision. At the completion of the reconstruction, a small skin paddle is externalized through the mastectomy incision and in a subsequent stage entirely incorporated into a nipple areola reconstruction. Following completion of the breast and nipple areola reconstruction, a tattoo is performed that extends beyond the perimeter of the reconstructed areola and conceals all scars on the breast mound. The ideal candidate for this technique has a small or medium size breast, which is non- or minimally ptotic, and a donor site that can yield a flap larger than the volume of the native breast. In properly selected patients, this technique consistently yields high-quality results, which match or even surpass the aesthetics of the original breast.

Optimizing aesthetic outcomes for breast reconstruction in patients with significant macromastia or ptosis.

BACKGROUND: Achieving excellent aesthetic outcomes in reconstruction of large or ptotic breasts is especially challenging. Incorporating a Wise pattern into the mastectomy design is effective in reducing the excess breast skin, however it increases the risk of mastectomy skin necrosis. The aim of this study is to describe surgical maneuvers which optimize aesthetic outcomes, anticipate flap volume requirements, and limit mastectomy skin necrosis in autologous reconstruction in patients with macromastia and grade III ptosis. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of operative and clinical records of patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral breast reconstruction with autologous tissue between August 2015 and May 2017. Patients were divided into macromastia and ptosis groups. Key surgical maneuvers for safely achieving aesthetically optimal results were identified. RESULTS: A total of 29 breasts were successfully reconstructed in 19 patients with a Wise pattern mastectomy skin reduction. Free flap weights were similar in both groups, mastectomy weights were greater in the macromastia group, p < 0.05. Complications were limited to three cases of wound breakdown and one case of mastectomy skin necrosis. Total number of revision stages was reduced in unilateral reconstructions when a contralateral breast reduction or mastopexy was performed during the first stage. CONCLUSIONS: A Wise pattern can safely and effectively be incorporated into a mastectomy incision design in patients who are not candidates for a nipple sparing mastectomy. Optimal aesthetics are achieved with similar volume flaps for both macromastia and ptosis patients. In cases of unilateral breast reconstruction a contralateral breast reduction or mastopexy should be performed at the time of the immediate breast reconstruction.

Optimizing Aesthetic Outcomes in Delayed Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The need to restore both the missing breast volume and breast surface area makes achieving excellent aesthetic outcomes in delayed breast reconstruction especially challenging. Autologous breast reconstruction can be used to achieve both goals. The aim of this study was to identify surgical maneuvers that can optimize aesthetic outcomes in delayed breast reconstruction. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of operative and clinical records of all patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral delayed breast reconstruction with autologous tissue between April 2014 and January 2017. Three groups of delayed breast reconstruction patients were identified based on patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 26 flaps were successfully performed in 17 patients. Key surgical maneuvers for achieving aesthetically optimal results were identified. A statistically significant difference for volume requirements was identified in cases where a delayed breast reconstruction and a contralateral immediate breast reconstruction were performed simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal aesthetic results can be achieved with: (1) restoration of breast skin envelope with tissue expansion when possible, (2) optimal positioning of a small skin paddle to be later incorporated entirely into a nipple areola reconstruction when adequate breast skin surface area is present, (3) limiting the reconstructed breast mound to 2 skin tones when large area skin resurfacing is required, (4) increasing breast volume by deepithelializing, not discarding, the inferior mastectomy flap skin, (5) eccentric division of abdominal flaps when an immediate and delayed bilateral breast reconstructions are performed simultaneously; and (6) performing second-stage breast reconstruction revisions and fat grafting.

The Laparoscopically Harvested Omental Free Flap: A Compelling Option for Craniofacial and Cranial Base Reconstruction.

Background Management of craniofacial and cranial base tumors is a challenge due to the anatomic intricacies associated with the calvarium, the pathological diversity of lesions that present, and the potential complications. Clinical outcomes in laparoscopically harvested omentum free flaps for cranial base and craniofacial reconstruction are presented in this paper, in the largest case series to date. Methods A retrospective single-center experience for over 10 years with laparoscopically harvested omentum flaps used to reconstruct craniofacial and cranial base defects. Results A total of 13 patients underwent craniofacial or cranial base reconstruction using laparoscopically harvested omentum free flaps. The mean patient age was 48 years. The anterior skull base represented the most common site of reconstruction. A total of 12 of the flaps survived (92%), with one flap failure due to infection. All patients demonstrated satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcomes. There were no perioperative or intra-abdominal complications. Conclusions The laparoscopically harvested omentum free flap is a safe and effective tool in the armamentarium of the reconstructive surgeon. It is the ideal option to treat complex, three-dimensional subcutaneous defects, such as those encountered in craniofacial and cranial base reconstruction. Its unique angiogenic and immunologic capacity makes it an excellent flap for the previously irradiated and/or infected wound bed.

Erratum: The Laparoscopically Harvested Omental Free Flap: A Compelling Option for Craniofacial and Cranial Base Reconstruction.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597138.].

Lower Extremity Osseous Oncologic Reconstruction with Composite Microsurgical Free Fibula Inside Massive Bony Allograft.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity reconstruction after resection of long bone tumors in children is challenging because of the unique functional demands and growth potential of the lower extremity. The use of a free fibula flap inside a massive bone allograft provides a reliable reconstructive option. The authors evaluate the surgical and functional outcomes of using this technique. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 12 consecutive patients who underwent reconstruction of segmental femur or tibia defects using a free fibula flap inside a massive bone allograft between 2003 and 2011. Complications and functional outcomes are reported. RESULTS: Twelve patients with a mean age of 15.8 years (range, 3 to 49 years) were included in the study. Eight femur defects and four tibia defects were reconstructed. The mean follow-up time was 41.4 months. Two constructs were removed because of infection, three patients required bone grafting for nonunion, one patient required an additional operation to excise a skin paddle, and one patient experienced a lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. The mean time to achieve full weight bearing was 14.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a free fibula flap inside a massive bone allograft after bone tumor resection provides an option for lower extremity reconstruction. The allograft component increases the initial strength of the reconstruction, whereas the vascularized fibula component is thought to increase the biologic potential for osteosynthesis and ultimately provide a potentially lifelong durable reconstruction. Patients who achieve oncologic control are likely to enjoy a highly functional long-term outcome. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Incidence of oronasal fistula formation after nasoalveolar molding and primary cleft repair.

The incidence of postoperative complications in cleft care is low. In this 19-year retrospective analysis of cleft lip and palate patients treated with preoperative nasoalveolar molding, we examine the incidence of postoperative oronasal fistulae. The charts of 178 patients who underwent preoperative nasoalveolar molding by the same orthodontist/prosthodontist team and primary cleft lip/palate repair by the same surgeon over a 19-year period were reviewed. Millard, Mohler, Cutting, or Mulliken-type techniques were used for cleft lip repairs. Oxford-, Bardach-, or von Langenbeck-type techniques were used for cleft palate repairs. One nasolabial fistula occurred after primary cleft lip repair (0.56% incidence) and was repaired surgically. Four palatal fistulae (3 at the junction between soft and hard palate and 1 at the right anterior palate near the incisive foramen) occurred, but 3 healed spontaneously. Only 1 palatal fistula (0.71%) required surgical repair. All 5 fistulae occurred within the first 8 years of the study period, with 4 (80%) of 5 occurring within the first 3 years. Although fistula rate may be related to surgeon experience and the evolution of presurgical techniques, nasoalveolar molding in conjunction with nasal floor closure contributes to a low incidence of oronasal fistulae.

Cleft palate midface is both hypoplastic and displaced.

Despite significant advances in cleft lip and palate treatment, anatomical controversies remain. Some have proposed that the width of the cleft is due to alveolar segmental displacement. Others suggest that the width is due to palatoalveolar hypoplasia. Improving our understanding of cleft anatomy may have implications for presurgical orthopedics and tissue engineering therapies. Palatoalveolar impressions of 17 noncleft children and 11 children with complete (alveolar, primary, and secondary) unilateral cleft palates were taken. Maxillary tuberosity positions and maxillary volumes were compared. Tuberosity position was determined by facebow transfer of palatoalveolar casts into geodetic datum boxes, and identification of the Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) of the tuberosities relative to the box surfaces and Frankfurt horizontal. Maxillary volume was determined by immersing the palatoalveolar casts and measuring sand displacement. A significant difference was noted in the average tuberosity to contralateral tuberosity distance between cleft and noncleft cohorts. On average, cleft palate tuberosities were laterally displaced 8.7 mm compared with noncleft palates (P < 0.05). There was neither statistically significant alveolar segment elevation nor retroversion. A significant difference was noted in the average palatoalveolar volumes. The cleft palatoalveolar volume was 5.7 cm, and the noncleft palatoalveolar volume was 7.2 cm (P < 0.05). A palatal cleft is due to both alveolar tissue displacement and deficiency. Therefore, ideal cleft palate care should involve the correction of a displaced and deficient alveolus.

Presurgical nasoalveolar molding and primary gingivoperiosteoplasty reduce the need for bone grafting in patients with bilateral clefts.

Preoperative nasoalveolar molding (NAM) in combination with primary gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) reduces the need for secondary alveolar bone grafting by 60% in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (CL/P). Herein, we investigate the efficacy of NAM and primary GPP in patients with bilateral CL/P. All patients (n = 38) with bilateral CL/P who underwent NAM and primary GPP from 1988 to 1998 with at least 14 years of follow-up were included in this study. Panoramic and periapical radiographs were used to assess dentoalveolar bone formation. A total of 38 patients were identified with median follow-up of 18 years (range 14-26 years). Of the 27 patients who underwent bilateral GPP, 14 (51%) patients had successful dentoalveolar bone formation bilaterally and 13 (49%) had unilateral bone formation. No patient had a bilateral failure. Of the 11 patients who underwent unilateral GPP, 7 (63%) patients had successful dentoalveolar bone formation. Bilateral successful dentoalveolar bone formation following primary bilateral GPP has a dependent probability of 52% and a conditional probability of 82%.

Best face forward: Virtual modeling and custom device fabrication to optimize craniofacial vascularized composite allotransplantation.

Craniofacial vascularized composite allotransplantation is especially challenging when bony components are required. Matching the complex three-dimensional anatomy of the donor and recipient craniofacial skeletons to optimize bony contact and dental occlusion is a time-consuming step in the operating room. Currently, few tools exist to facilitate this process. The authors describe the development of a virtual planning protocol and patient-specific device design to efficiently match the donor and recipient skeletal elements in craniofacial vascularized composite allotransplantation. The protocol was validated in a cadaveric transplant. This innovative planning method allows a "snap-fit" reconstruction using custom surgical guides while maintaining facial height and width and functional occlusion. Postoperative overlay technology in the virtual environment provides an objective outcome analysis.

Nasoalveolar molding improves long-term nasal symmetry in complete unilateral cleft lip-cleft palate patients.

BACKGROUND: Nasoalveolar molding was developed to improve dentoalveolar, septal, and lower lateral cartilage position before cleft lip repair. Previous studies have documented the long-term maintenance of columella length and nasal dome form and projection. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of presurgical nasoalveolar molding on long-term unilateral complete cleft nasal symmetry. METHODS: A retrospective review of 25 consecutively presenting nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip-cleft palate patients was conducted. Fifteen patients were treated with presurgical nasoalveolar molding for 3 months before surgical correction, and 10 patients were treated by surgical correction alone. The average age at the time of follow-up was 9 years. Four nasal anthropometric distances and two angular relationships were measured to assess nasal symmetry. RESULTS: All six measurements demonstrated a greater degree of nasal symmetry in nasoalveolar molding patients compared with the patients treated with surgery alone. Five symmetry measurements were significantly more symmetric in the nasoalveolar molding patients and one measurement demonstrated a nonsignificant but greater degree of symmetry compared with the patients treated with surgery alone. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate that the lower lateral and septal cartilages are more symmetric in the nasoalveolar molding patients compared with the surgery-alone patients. Furthermore, the improved symmetry observed in nasoalveolar molding-treated noses during the time of the primary surgery is maintained at 9 years of age.

The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of bilateral mandibular distraction.

BACKGROUND: The application of distraction osteogenesis is an effective treatment for mandibular deficiencies. A priori, a horizontal vector of distraction was hypothesized to produce horizontal movement of the mandible and a vertical vector of distraction to produce primarily downward vertical elongation of the ramus. This study was designed to test this hypothesis. METHODS: A retrospective clinical and radiographic review was conducted of all patients who underwent bilateral, uniplanar distraction with an external device at the New York University Medical Center between October of 1990 and February of 2004 (n = 185). A subset of 15 patients was identified who satisfied inclusion criteria and had adequate predistraction and postdistraction lateral cephalograms. Cephalometric tracings were made and multiple landmarks were assessed before and after distraction. RESULTS: A strong correlation was noted between the vector of distraction and rotation of the symphyseal plane, movement of the mandibular symphysis, and change in interocclusal angle. A horizontal vector of distraction resulted in minimal counterclockwise rotation of the symphyseal plane, greater downward vertical translation of the mandibular symphysis, and minimal closure of an anterior open bite. In contrast, a vertical vector resulted in greater counterclockwise rotation of the symphyseal plane, greater horizontal projection of the mandibular symphysis, and greater closure of an anterior open bite. Mathematical formulas were derived to correlate the distraction vector and mandibular movements. CONCLUSIONS: Successful distraction is dependent on accurate prediction of outcomes. This study demonstrates that the vector of distraction predictably affects the mandibular response during bilateral distraction osteogenesis but contradicts the a priori hypothesis.

The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of unilateral mandibular distraction.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral craniofacial microsomia is characterized by soft-tissue and bony deficiencies. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis can be used to augment the hypoplastic skeleton and improve facial symmetry. The aim of this study was to determine how the vector of unilateral mandibular distraction affects treatment outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart and radiographic review was conducted of all patients treated with external mandibular distraction osteogenesis between October of 1990 and February of 2004 (n = 185). A subset of 42 patients underwent primary unilateral, uniplanar, external distraction, and 13 patients were found to have satisfied inclusion criteria and had adequate predistraction and postdistraction lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms. Cephalometric tracings were made and multiple points and planes were assessed before and after distraction. RESULTS: A strong correlation was noted between the vector of distraction and the movement of the mandible. A horizontal vector of distraction resulted in minimal increase in ramal length but a marked shift in the mandibular midline (r = 0.68, p < 0.05). In contrast, a vertical vector of distraction resulted in marked mandibular ramus lengthening but minimal mandibular midline shift (r = 0.73, p < 0.05). Mathematical formulas were derived to correlate the distraction vector and mandibular movements to improve preoperative planning. CONCLUSIONS: Successful distraction is dependent on accurate preoperative planning and prediction of outcomes. This study demonstrates a predictable relationship between the vector of unilateral distraction and the mandibular response.