Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 54
Filter
2.
Dis Mon ; 69(10): 101499, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36357235
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(Suppl 2): S114-S120, 2021 03 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33709126

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) causes substantive morbidity in immunocompromised patients. The EORTC/MSGERC convened an expert group to elaborate consensus definitions for Pneumocystis disease for the purpose of interventional clinical trials and epidemiological studies and evaluation of diagnostic tests. METHODS: Definitions were based on the triad of host factors, clinical-radiologic features, and mycologic tests with categorization into probable and proven Pneumocystis disease, and to be applicable to immunocompromised adults and children without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Definitions were formulated and their criteria debated and adjusted after public consultation. The definitions were published within the 2019 update of the EORTC/MSGERC Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease. Here we detail the scientific rationale behind the disease definitions. RESULTS: The diagnosis of proven PCP is based on clinical and radiologic criteria plus demonstration of P. jirovecii by microscopy using conventional or immunofluorescence staining in tissue or respiratory tract specimens. Probable PCP is defined by the presence of appropriate host factors and clinical-radiologic criteria, plus amplification of P. jirovecii DNA by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in respiratory specimens and/or detection of ß-d-glucan in serum provided that another invasive fungal disease and a false-positive result can be ruled out. Extrapulmonary Pneumocystis disease requires demonstration of the organism in affected tissue by microscopy and, preferably, PCR. CONCLUSIONS: These updated definitions of Pneumocystis diseases should prove applicable in clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic research in a broad range of immunocompromised patients without HIV.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Pneumocystis carinii , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis , Adult , Child , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , HIV , Humans , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/epidemiology , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 22(1): 95-102, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32466741

ABSTRACT

Background: Unusual infections can lead to complications in more severely burned patients and pose major challenges in treatment. Methods: The published literature of retrospective reviews and case series of the uncommon infections of osteomyelitis, polymicrobial bacteremia, recurrent bacteremia, endocarditis, central nervous system (CNS), and rare fungal infections in burned patients have been summarized and presented. Results: When compared with infections occurring in the non-burn population, these infections in burn patients are more likely to be because of gram-negative bacteria or fungi. Because of hyperdynamic physiology and changes in immunomodulatory response secondary to burns, the clinical presentation of these infections in a patient with major burns differs from that of the non-burn patient and may not be identified until the post-mortem examination. Some of these infections (osteomyelitis, endocarditis, CNS, rare fungal infections) may necessitate surgical intervention in addition to antimicrobial therapy to achieve cure. The presence of the burn and allograft can also present unique challenges for surgical management. Conclusions: These difficult and unusual infections in the severely burned patient necessitate an index of suspicion, appropriate diagnosis, identification and sensitivities of the putative pathogen, effective systemic antimicrobial therapy, and appropriate surgical intervention if recovery is to be achieved.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Burns , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Burns/complications , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Humans , Retrospective Studies
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(6): 1367-1376, 2020 09 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31802125

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) remain important causes of morbidity and mortality. The consensus definitions of the Infectious Diseases Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group have been of immense value to researchers who conduct clinical trials of antifungals, assess diagnostic tests, and undertake epidemiologic studies. However, their utility has not extended beyond patients with cancer or recipients of stem cell or solid organ transplants. With newer diagnostic techniques available, it was clear that an update of these definitions was essential. METHODS: To achieve this, 10 working groups looked closely at imaging, laboratory diagnosis, and special populations at risk of IFD. A final version of the manuscript was agreed upon after the groups' findings were presented at a scientific symposium and after a 3-month period for public comment. There were several rounds of discussion before a final version of the manuscript was approved. RESULTS: There is no change in the classifications of "proven," "probable," and "possible" IFD, although the definition of "probable" has been expanded and the scope of the category "possible" has been diminished. The category of proven IFD can apply to any patient, regardless of whether the patient is immunocompromised. The probable and possible categories are proposed for immunocompromised patients only, except for endemic mycoses. CONCLUSIONS: These updated definitions of IFDs should prove applicable in clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic research of a broader range of patients at high-risk.


Subject(s)
Invasive Fungal Infections , Mycoses , Neoplasms , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Consensus , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Invasive Fungal Infections/diagnosis , Invasive Fungal Infections/drug therapy , Mycoses/diagnosis , Mycoses/drug therapy , Mycoses/epidemiology , Neoplasms/drug therapy
6.
Mil Med ; 183(suppl_1): 445-449, 2018 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29635556

ABSTRACT

Objectives: We evaluated human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) administration at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC), which serves a geographic area at high risk of HIV infection. Methods: Medical records were reviewed for all patients initiating PrEP at WRNMMC from November 1, 2013, to March 30, 2016. Demographic, laboratory, clinical, and risk exposure characteristics and outcomes were described. Results: One hundred fifty-nine patients received PrEP; 133 (84%) patients were active duty, 95 (60%) patients were over 28 yr old. The majority were non-Hispanic Whites (n = 87, 55%). The median men who have sex with men (MSM) risk index score was 18.0 (IQR 12.0-22.0); 20 patients scored less than 10. One hundred and thirty-one (82%) patients remained on PrEP through the evaluation period. Patients mainly discontinued PrEP for service-related or toxicity reasons. Incident STIs occurred in 31 (19%) patients. No cases of HIV seroconversion were observed. Conclusions: In this first description of PrEP utilization in a U.S. military health care system, a significant number of patients were non-Hispanic Whites, well-educated, were older, or were otherwise at low risk for HIV acquisition. Further effort is needed to enhance PrEP use among the higher risk young African-American MSM population, and further studies are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of PrEP in individuals who are not categorized as high risk.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/prevention & control , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV-1/drug effects , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Military Medicine/methods , Military Medicine/trends , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Risk Factors , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data
9.
Dis Mon ; 62(8): 287-93, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27109044
11.
Dis Mon ; 62(8): 260-8, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27107780
16.
Dis Mon ; 62(8): 280-6, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27091635
18.
Dis Mon ; 58(6): 327-9, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22608118
19.
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...