Applications of Participatory System Dynamics Methods to Public Health: A Systematic Review.

System dynamics, and specifically qualitative participatory applications of system dynamics, have potential to benefit public health research, scholarship, and practice. A systematic review was conducted to examine the existing applications of participatory system dynamics (PSD) to public health research. Three databases were searched using unique search terms related to PSD and methodological applications in public health research. A total of 57 unique articles met inclusion criteria and were included for review. The studies included for review were conducted globally and represent a wide breadth of public health issues. The review identified several advantages to adopting PSD methods in public health scholarship and practice. The PSD methods provide innovative frameworks for conceptualizing complex and nuanced public health problems. The participatory nature of PSD allows for increased community engagement and empowerment to address public health problems, as well as to mitigate existing power dynamics between research institutions and marginalized communities that are disproportionately impacted by social and health inequities. Finally, causal loop diagrams developed using PSD methods have unique potential to convey complex concepts to policy makers and interventionists. This systematic review reports evidence for PSD's potential to advance equity in public health research and practice.

The Early Effects of the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic on Pediatric Resident Education: A National Assessment.

PURPOSE: Residency programs must ensure resident competence for independent practice. The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted health care delivery, impacting pediatric residencies. This study examines the impact on pediatric resident education. METHODS: The authors conducted a mixed methods national survey of pediatric residency program directors (PDs) from May 2020 to July 2020. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Multivariable modeling identified factors associated with resident preparation for more senior roles. Thematic analysis was performed on open-ended questions about PD COVID-19 pandemic recommendations to peers, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Board of Pediatrics. RESULTS: Response rate was 55% (110/199). PDs reported the COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected inpatient (n = 86, 78.2%), and outpatient education (n = 104, 94.5%), procedural competence (n = 64; 58.2%), and resident preparation for more senior roles (n = 50, 45.5%). In bivariate analyses, increasingly negative impacts on inpatient and outpatient education were associated with an increasingly negative impact on resident preparation for more senior roles (P = .03, P = .008), these relationships held true in multivariable analysis. Qualitative analysis identified 4 themes from PD recommendations: 1) Clear communication from governing bodies and other leaders; 2) Flexibility within programs and from governing bodies; 3) Clinical exposure is key for competency development; 4) Online platforms are important for education, communication, and support. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted inpatient and outpatient education. When these were more negatively impacted, resident preparation for more senior roles was worse, highlighting the importance of competency based medical education to tailor experiences ensuring each resident is competent for independent practice.

LGBTQ+ Microaggressions in Health Care: Piloting an Observation Framework in a Standardized Patient Assessment.

Microaggressions are subtle derogatory behaviors that unintentionally communicate hostility toward marginalized social groups. This article describes the preliminarily validation of a framework for observing LGBTQ+ microaggressions in health care, which can lead to distrust and disengagement from the healthcare system. Coders used the framework to observe microaggressions in video-recorded clinical-skills assessments with medical students who elicited health histories from standardized patients. Microaggression classifications were reviewed to determine construct reliability and the presence/absence among eight framework categories. Among 177 encounters with sexual and gender minority standardized patients, heteronormative/cisnormative language and assumptions occurred in the largest proportion of encounters (85.3%). Only identity-based referrals decreased significantly after a clinical skills intervention (20.0% to 4.9%, p = .01). These outcomes show that LGBTQ+ healthcare microaggressions are pervasive and will likely require nuanced training to address them. This groundwork can also be used to develop scales for patients and observers to identify microaggressions and assess perceived impact.

Epistemic Peerhood as a Model To Improve Gender-Affirming Care in Medical Education.

Issue: Inadequate training around gender-affirming care is a critical gap in health care and medical education that causes disparities and leads to injury for transgender, nonbinary, and other gender-diverse patients. In contrast to this widespread provider knowledge gap, gender-diverse patients bring critical knowledge from their own experiences to health care. Embracing varied epistemologies, or sources of knowledge, within medical education has the potential to enhance gender-affirming care by intentionally placing value on the lived experiences and emphasizing the credibility of gender-diverse patients. Evidence: In this article, the authors endorse a model of epistemic peerhood in which the embodied knowledge of gender-diverse patients and the authoritative knowledge of providers are each valued for their contribution to care. The authors reflect on experiences developing gender-affirming healthcare curricula and how medical education has not yet adequately addressed gender-diverse care without embracing community knowledge. Implications: The authors identify three vital areas to integrate epistemic peerhood in medical training to address gaps in gender-affirming care: (1) collaborative student training methods that reflect embodied knowledge in the absence of, or in addition to, clinical expertise on gender-affirming care; (2) sustainable partnerships between academic programs and gender-diverse communities that foster continuous engagement from collaborators with lived experience; and (3) broad community input about best practices for representing gender diversity in patient simulation. Embracing epistemic peerhood in each of these areas would result in broader gender-diverse community representation and leadership in medical education, which would ultimately strengthen gender-affirming healthcare training.

Board certification of professional chaplains: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives.

Many professional chaplaincy organizations in the United States have board certified healthcare chaplains since the 1920s and documented how they have adapted their process as the profession has grown. In 2019, the Association of Professional Chaplains and the National Association of Catholic Chaplains sought the perspectives of key stakeholders about professional chaplaincy board certification. This study reports the results from 50 semi-structured interviews with certification candidates, certification committee members, and chaplaincy managers in the United States. Participants discussed the preparation of the certification application, the certification interview, the ease and difficulty of certification competencies, and the evolving workforce. This study demonstrated divergent views on many aspects of board certification, but participants predominately respected and valued the process. Chaplains with varying levels of experience discussed how board certification strengthens multidisciplinary respect and collaboration. Participants reported difficulties with competencies that required translating between theory and practice.