Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Publication year range
1.
Int Urogynecol J ; 34(3): 771-775, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36063194

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Prolapse is a common condition seen in women and its therapeutical management consists first and foremost of surgery. Postoperative pain is one of the most common side effects seen after surgery. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for postoperative pain after cystocele repair with mesh. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the multicenter randomized trial PROSPERE, which compared cystocele repair with mesh according to the vaginal or laparoscopic approach. The presence of postoperative pain was assessed by a pain-specific self-reported questionnaire (Questionnaire de Baudelocque). The statistical analysis is based on the Wilcoxon, Chi-squared, and Fisher's tests. RESULTS: The prevalence of postoperative pain (pain persisting more than 6 months) was 39% (80 out of 205, 95% CI 32.4-46.1), with 6.3% (13 out of 205) of chronic pain reports. Preoperative pain was the only statistically significant risk factor OR = 2.32 (p = 0,007; 95% CI 1.24-4.36). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons must be careful with preoperative painful prolapse and should inform their patient of the risk of developing postoperative chronic pain.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Cystocele , Female , Humans , Cystocele/surgery , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects , Chronic Pain/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 49(6): 101684, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31926349

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal mesh has been proven to be an effective aid in the treatment of cystocele. Could an ambulatory approach be feasible for the Uphold Lite®-mesh? HYPOTHESIS: We investigate the feasibility of an ambulatory approach of Uphold Lite® insertion in a well-selected population. Risk factors for a non-successful ambulatory approach are identified. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a retrospective case series of 236 women who underwent Uphold Lite® vaginal mesh insertion for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse at our center. Indications for surgery were symptomatic anterior and/or apical prolapse, stages POPQ≥2. We compared women having an ambulatory approach, to those having a one day hospitalization planned but needed to stay. Comparisons between percentages were calculated using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test, depending on the number of women in each group. The mean comparisons were performed using the Student t-test, and the median test comparisons by the Kruskal-Wallis test. A difference was considered significant if p<0.05. RESULTS: The most common reason for staying (85.7% of all ambulatory failures) after Uphold® surgery is the presence of an elevated post void residual. This complication was more found in the following: surgery in the afternoon, use of high-dose morphinics in general anesthesia, and in women with a higher parity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that Uphold® surgery in a one-day setting is feasible and safe. Women desiring this approach should be counselled on the 42.6% risk of one-day failure though, mostly due to non-validation of a post void residual. General anesthesia with high-dose morphinics, a higher parity, and surgery in the afternoon are risk factors for failure of an ambulatory protocol.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Surgical Mesh/statistics & numerical data , Vagina/surgery , Aged , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Feasibility Studies , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
3.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 47(7-8): 582-590, 2019.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31255836

ABSTRACT

Extra-uterine leiomyomatosis is a rare pathology defined by the presence of benign smooth uterine muscle cells in unusual localizations, including different entities. It mainly affects premenopausal women with a medical history of uterine myoma with or without surgical treatment. Three main types are discribed: intraveinous leiomyomatosis, benign metastatisizing leiomyoma and leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata. The diagnosis may be complex with many differential diagnosis, and relies on histology. The treatment depends on multiple factors such as age, localization, size, symptoms and associated comorbidities. It is based on surgical resection and hormonal privation, surgical (adnexectomy) or medical (hormonotherapy). There is a high risk of recurrence. Some malignant evolutions have been reported, mostly leiomyosarcoma following peritoneal disseminated leiomyomatosis. Long term follow-up of these patients is mandatory. A particular manifestation of extra-uterine leiomyomatosis is the hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) syndrome. It is an autosomal dominant disorder which confers an increased risk of cutaneous and uterine leiomyomas and renal cell cancer, with a poor prognosis due to the urologic tumor.


Subject(s)
Leiomyomatosis/pathology , Female , Humans , Leiomyomatosis/drug therapy , Leiomyomatosis/genetics , Leiomyomatosis/surgery , Neoplasm Metastasis/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/genetics , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/pathology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Neoplasms/genetics , Uterine Neoplasms/pathology , Vascular Neoplasms/pathology , Veins/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL