Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Fish Biol ; 91(2): 617-627, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28776702

ABSTRACT

In this study, morphological differences were found that corroborate earlier results that showed the existence of six species within the previously monospecific African pike genus Hepsetus. Additional genetic data (coI, mtDNA and rag1, nDNA) confirm the morphology-based species delineations. Deep genetic divergences imply a relatively old age for diversification within the genus. An identification key for the six species is provided in the present study.


Subject(s)
Esocidae/classification , Phylogeny , Animals , Biodiversity , Cell Nucleus/genetics , Characiformes/genetics , DNA, Mitochondrial/chemistry , Esocidae/anatomy & histology , Esocidae/genetics , Species Specificity
2.
J Fish Biol ; 82(4): 1351-75, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23557311

ABSTRACT

An α-taxonomic revision of the African pike, Hepsetus odoe, from Lower Guinea is provided. The results show that three different species occur in Lower Guinea instead of one. Hepsetus akawo, recently described from West Africa, is present in the northern part of Lower Guinea; Hepsetus lineata, the most widespread species within Lower Guinea, is known from the Sanaga (Cameroon) in the north to the Shiloango (Democratic Republic of the Congo) in the south and Hepsetus kingsleyae sp. nov. is endemic to the Ogowe Basin. The new species H. kingsleyae is described and H. lineata, which is elevated here to the species level, is redescribed. Hepsetus lineata can easily be recognized by its prominent horizontal line pattern on the flanks and differs further from H. akawo and H. kingsleyae in the number of lateral-line scales and the number of gill rakers. Hepsetus kingsleyae differs from H. lineata and H. akawo by its narrow head, elongated snout and narrow, knife-shaped body. All three species are also distinguishable from H. odoe and the recently revalidated H. cuvieri. A few exceptional specimens could not be allocated to one of the three species and may represent hybrids because of their mixed diagnostic characters or their intermediate values.


Subject(s)
Characiformes/anatomy & histology , Characiformes/classification , Animals , Guinea
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...