ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Secondary peritonitis, following intestinal perforation, constitutes a significant proportion of cases admitted as a surgical emergency and has a mortality rate of 6-21% worldwide. As a part of an antimicrobial stewardship program, we noted considerable variation among the choice of empirical regimens among such cases. Hence, we conducted a prospective study to generate the evidence for a rational empiric regimen for patients with secondary peritonitis following intestinal perforation. METHODS: The study included a complete follow up of 77 cases of secondary peritonitis admitted during a 12 month period. The intraoperative fluid (peritoneal) sample of the patient was sent for culture and sensitivity pattern analysis. RESULTS: The sites of perforation as seen in decreasing order were lower gastrointestinal (GI) (50.6%), upper GI (36.4%), and unclassified (13%). The most common organism found in the intraoperative fluid was Escherichia coli (47.9%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.5%). amikacin, cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam and imipenem were sensitive in 22 (out of 23 tested), 5 (out of 9), 13 (out of 13) and 22 (out of 22) isolates of E. coli and 3 (out of 6), 1 (out of 3), 4 (out of 6), 4 (out of 6) isolates of K. pneumoniae, respectively. The most common empirical antibiotic was cefoperazone-sulbactam (38.7%) followed by piperacillin-tazobactam (29.3%). CONCLUSION: Based on our prospective study, piperacillin-tazobactam or imipenem should be used empirically in patients presenting with complicated intra-abdominal infections secondary to perforated viscus, especially if they have sepsis or septic shock.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The role of surgery in abdominal tuberculosis is being redefined, as many patients will be candidates for endoscopic dilatation rather than open surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was done of the surgical procedures performed in patients with abdominal tuberculosis in a large tertiary-care center in North India. Details such as clinical presentations, previous history of tuberculosis, any anti-tubercular therapy (ATT), Mantoux skin test results, and the surgical procedures and findings were recorded. Short-term outcomes also were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (26 male) were included, and the median age at presentation was 24 years (range 12-80 years). Sixteen patients had received prior ATT for abdominal tuberculosis. The indication for surgery was intestinal obstruction, perforation, and bleeding in 23 (66%), 10 (29%), and 2 (6%) respectively. Twenty-eight patients had intestinal strictures, with the ileum being the most common site (n = 21). Perforation was present in 10 patients, of which six had multiple perforations. Cocoon abdomen was present in four patients, two of whom had associated small-bowel stricture. Among 33 patients who underwent bowel resection, 14 had ileo-cecal resection/right hemicolectomy. The rest had small-bowel resection. Primary anastomosis and stoma creation was performed in 12 (36%) and 21 (64%), respectively. Post-operative intra-abdominal collections (p = 0.02) and incision dehiscence (p = 0.05) were more common in patients having stoma creation. CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention is warranted in a subset of patients with abdominal tuberculosis and may be required in patients with recurrent intestinal obstruction or pain, intestinal perforation, or gastrointestinal bleeding.
