Inter- and intra-fractional bladder motion during radiotherapy for bladder cancer: a comparison of full and empty bladders.

PURPOSE: To compare inter- and intra-fraction bladder volume variations and bladder wall motion during radiotherapy (RT) for bladder cancer with full and empty bladder protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bladder volumes, filling rates and bladder wall movement were retrospectively analyzed for 24 patients with at least 4 sets of delineable pre and post treatment cone beam CT (CBCT)-scans. Eight patients were treated with an 'empty bladder' (EB) protocol and sixteen patients with a 'full bladder' (FB) protocol. RESULTS: 24 planning CT-scans and 356 CBCT-scans (178 sets) were analyzed. The average time between pre and post irradiation CBCT was 8min (range 6-18min). Median filling rate was 1.94ml/min and did not differ between EB and FB. Random variation in bladder volume and inter-fraction wall movement was slightly but not significantly larger for FB, whereas intra-fraction bladder wall movement was slightly but not significantly smaller for FB. The largest inter- and intra-fraction bladder wall movement was found in the cranial anterior direction. CONCLUSION: Empty and full bladder protocols show similar inter- and intra-fraction wall motion, and therefore treatment choices could be purely based on organ at risk criteria.

Fusion of planning CT and cystoscopy images for bladder tumor delineation: a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: Bladder tumor delineation and localization during treatment are challenging problems in radiotherapy for bladder cancer. The purpose of this study is to investigate improvement of tumor delineation by the fusion of cystoscopy images with the planning CT-scan using lipiodol markers injected around the visible tumor during cystoscopy. METHODS: A registration method was developed for the fusion of cystoscopy images with a planning CT-scan and was tested on a phantom and retrospectively on the imaging data of four bladder cancer patients. For the patients, small deposits of lipiodol were injected at the visible margin of the tumor or previous transurethral resection site during cystoscopy. These deposits were clearly visible on the planning CT-scan and served as markers for both tumor delineation and image guidance of the radiotherapy treatment. Here, the markers were used for the registration of cystoscopy images with the planning CT-scan. The registration procedure works as follows: First, coarse registrations were made to orient the cystoscopy image correctly, using the center of gravity of the markers, the center of the CT bladder, and one of N markers as fiducial points in a point matching procedure. Starting from these N orientations, full registrations are performed taking lens deformation into account. Since a cystoscopy image is 2D, each pixel corresponds to a line-of-sight. The distances between the CT markers and the lines-of-sight of the cystoscopy markers were minimized. The final cost function (the root mean square distance between corresponding CT markers and lines-of-sight) was used to quantify the quality of the registration. The registration with the lowest final cost was considered to represent the correct orientation. The CT-based tumor delineation was finally backprojected onto the cystoscopy image. RESULTS: The fusion of cystoscopy images with a planning CT-scan succeeded for the phantom and three out of four patients. The fiducial registration error (FRE) for the phantom image registration based on five markers was 1.1 mm, while the target registration error was 1.2-1.7 mm. The FREs for the patient images were 0.1-3.6 mm. The registration procedure failed for one patient, since it was not possible to indicate unambiguously the corresponding lipiodol marker locations in the cystoscopy image and the planning CT-scan. The difference between the CT and cystoscopy defined tumor outlines clearly exceeded the registration accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Registration of cystoscopy images and planning CT-scan is feasible and allows for improvement of tumor delineation. However, the lipiodol injection protocol needs to be improved to facilitate identification of markers on both cystoscopy images and planning CT-scans.