Management of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage in the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation population: A systematic review.

Pulmonary complications post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) such as diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) can occur in 2% to 14% of HSCT patients and have a mortality greater than 80%. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage is considered to be an inflammatory response; therefore, HSCT patients are primarily treated with different types of systemic corticosteroids with varying dosages. Other treatments currently reported in the literature in conjunction with corticosteroids include aminocaproic acid, recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), and etanercept. This review highlights appropriate frontline and adjunctive treatment options for HSCT patients with DAH and outcomes for each intervention. To perform the review, the PubMed database was searched from inception through March 19, 2021, to identify potential studies using the search terms DAH and HSCT, DAH and hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), DAH and stem cell, lung injury and HSCT, and lung injury and HCT. When applicable, references from articles identified in the search were also reviewed for inclusion. Much of the data identified were limited to retrospective cohort studies and case series. Based on the data available, the treatment approach should consist of corticosteroid therapy with a suggested methylprednisolone dose of 250 mg daily followed by a 50% taper every 3 days. Intrapulmonary administration of rFVIIa and intravenous administration of aminocaproic acid could be considered as adjunctive agents in those patients who do not promptly respond to corticosteroid therapy. Due to a lack of data specific to HSCT patients who develop DAH and the risk of infectious complications, etanercept should be avoided. Future studies should be designed as randomized controlled trials and examine the use of adjunctive therapies in the upfront setting for HSCT patients with DAH.

Evaluation of a Computerized Insulin Dosing Tool for the Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

PURPOSE: Computerized insulin dosing tools (CIDT) have been shown to improve the care of critically ill patients with hyperglycemia. Application of a CIDT in addition to a diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) order set for the treatment of DKA has not been evaluated. Our goal was to determine the effects the CIDT would have on the treatment of a patient with DKA. METHODS: In this retrospective, pre-post chart review, a provider-driven insulin dosing strategy (pregroup) was compared to the CIDT (postgroup) with 24-hour pharmacist monitoring. The CIDT utilized an equation that incorporated a patient's most recent blood glucose (BG) value and recommended a rate of insulin (units/hour) every hour. RESULTS: All baseline characterizes were similar between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in average time to anion gap closure (≤ 12 mEq/L) or intensive care unit length of stay between the pregroup and postgroup (12.5 [6] hours vs 10.5 [7] hours, P = 0.235; 40.6 [24] hours vs 40.8 [24] hours, P = 0.945). Although not statistically significant, 17 hypoglycemic events (BG < 70 mg/dL) occurred in the pregroup with 4 being severe (BG < 50 mg/dL) while 5 hypoglycemic events occurred in the postgroup, none of which were severe. CONCLUSION: This study suggests, when compared to a provider-driven insulin dosing strategy, the CIDT with 24-hour pharmacist monitoring is efficacious and safe for treatment of patients with a primary diagnosis of DKA.

Major publications in critical care pharmacotherapy literature in 2018.

PURPOSE: To summarize selected original critical care pharmacotherapy research published in 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Critical Care Pharmacotherapy Literature Update (CCPLU) Group screened 32 journals monthly for impactful articles and reviewed 100 articles during 2018. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria were applied to all relevant articles included in the monthly CCPLU. Articles with a 1A grade, including one clinical practice guideline, two meta-analyses, and ten original research trials, were selected for review. RESULTS: Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption were summarized. Meta-analyses on the role of corticosteroids in sepsis and early enteral nutrition were reviewed. Included original research trials evaluated corticosteroids in sepsis, enteral and parenteral nutrition in patients with shock, tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke, antipsychotics for the treatment of intensive care unit delirium, vasopressors in cardiogenic shock, balanced crystalloids and saline for fluid administration, and meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam for treatment of resistant Gram-negative organisms. CONCLUSION: This clinical review and expert commentary of impactful critical care pharmacotherapy publications in 2018 provides perspectives and insights for the critical care practitioner.