[Systematic preoperative SARS-CoV-2 screening by chest CT before urological surgery]. / Dépistage préopératoire systématique du SARS-CoV-2 par scanner thoracique avant chirurgie urologique.

Due to COVID-19 outbreak, the Belgian Association of Urology recommended limiting non-emergency surgical care. The aim of this study was to analyze if a preoperative screening for COVID-19 was key to select optimal operative candidates and its impact on surgical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: we present a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent oncological high-risk and emergency urological surgeries in a Belgium tertiary center from March 30 to April 30, 2020. The screening protocol was based on clinical assessment and chest-CT to identify COVID-19-positive patients. RESULTS: a total of 32 patients underwent elective oncologic (n = 17; 53 %) and emergency (n = 15; 47 %) operations. Screening by chest-CT revealed three cases of COVID-19 (9 %) having led to postpone two interventions. The third positive COVID-19 patient died of respiratory complications after bladder perforation urgent procedure. Two patients developed compatible post-operatively symptoms with one positive chest-CT but no positive RT-PCR and successful recovery. Adapted safety measures were followed to mitigate in-hospital transmission. CONCLUSION: this report suggests feasibility and efficacy of systematic, preoperative screening for COVID-19 by chest computed tomography only. This strategy could allow to perform the majority of scheduled high-risk oncologic interventions safely for both the patients and the surgical staff.

Avec l'épidémie de COVID-19, l'Association Belge d'Urologie a recommandé de limiter les soins chirurgicaux non urgents. Le but de cette étude était d'analyser si un dépistage préopératoire de la COVID-19 était essentiel pour sélectionner les candidats opératoires optimaux et son impact sur les résultats chirurgicaux. Matériel et méthodes : nous présentons une analyse rétrospective des patients qui ont subi des chirurgies urologiques oncologiques à haut risque et d'urgence dans un centre tertiaire belge du 30 mars au 30 avril 2020. Le protocole de dépistage était une évaluation clinique plus CT thoracique pour identifier les patients COVID-19 positifs. Résultats : 32 patients ont bénéficié d'opérations oncologiques (n = 17; 53 %) et urgentes (n = 15; 47 %). Le dépistage par CT thoracique a révélé trois cas de COVID-19 (9 %) conduisant à deux reports de la chirurgie. Le troisième est décédé de complications respiratoires après procédure urgente pour perforation vésicale. Deux patients ont développé des symptômes postopératoires compatibles avec la COVID-19. Un CT thoracique était suspect, les RT-PCR négatives et les récupérations favorables. Des mesures de sécurité ont été instaurées pour atténuer la transmission intra-hospitalière. Conclusion : nous rapportons la faisabilité et l'efficacité du dépistage systématique préopératoire de la COVID-19 uniquement par CT thoracique. Cette stratégie pourrait permettre d'effectuer la majorité des interventions oncologiques à haut risque en toute sécurité pour les patients et le personnel chirurgical.

When residents work less, they feel better: Lessons learned from an unprecedent context of lockdown.

INTRODUCTION: With the COVID-19 outbreak activities of urology departments have been limited to non-deferrable procedures impacting the daily program of residents in urology. We assessed the psychological impact of the lockdown on Belgian residents in urology and their resounding on the quality of the training. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A self-administered anonymous questionnaire assessing the risk of burnout in a pandemic situation and its impact on the quality of the training was e-mailed to the members of the European Society of Residents in Urology of Belgium (ESRU-B). We used the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory score which assesses the different dimensions of burnout (personal (CBIP), professional (CBIPro), relational (CBIR)). Several questions evaluating impact on residents' health and apprehension of the future were included. The survey lasted for 5 days. Comparison of parameters before and during the coronavirus crisis was made using paired samples t-test or Chi2 test were. RESULTS: Fifty percent (62/126) of the ESRU-B members replied to the questionnaire. If 93% of the responders reported a negative impact on the quality of their practical training (CI95=[0.07-1.10]; P=0.83), 56% and 61.7% reported a positive impact of the crisis on their life and on their theoretical training respectively. Burnout risk scores were significantly reduced (P<0.001) for each dimension 7.26 to 3.40 (CBIP), 9.02 to 4.35 (CBIPro) and 4.42 to 3.03 (CBIR) respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite a negative impact on the daily work quality, the decrease in activity induced by the lockdown did not have a negative psychological impact on Belgian residents in urology but stress the opportunity to review the current training system to be better balanced between practice and theoretical formation.