[Prescription of psychotropic drugs in paediatry: approved indications and therapeutic perspectives]. / Prescription des psychotropes en pédopsychiatrie: limites des indications officielles et perspectives thérapeutiques.

In France, psychotropic drugs may be classified in four categories according to their official data. The first category corresponds to psychotropic drugs with an approved indication available in paediatry. Theyare old agents (e.g. haloperidol, amitriptyline, benzodiazepines...) with the exception of methylphenidate (hyperactivity). The second one corresponds to pharmacological agents approved for some indications obtained with adults but not for a1l (i.e. restricted indication: e.g. sertraline approved in paediatry only for OCD but not for depression, risperidone approved only for the treatment of disruptive behaviors in children with subaverage IQs). For the third category, the psychotropic agent is either contraindicated or unadvised under the age of 15 or 18 years, by lack of data (e.g. most of SSRI or atypical antipsychotic drugs). For the last category, official data available in brief summaries offer no information on paediatric use and consequently their administration does not appear possible. Up to now, no approved use has been delivered to injection route (IM or IV) in France, except for an IM formulation of zuclopenthixol. Prescribing psychotropic drug has to respect good practices including close psychological and somatic monitoring that associates the young patient and his relative (psycho-education program). Particular key-points should be taken into consideration (i.e. pharmacokinetic and physiological specificities, risk of false passage under the age of 6 years with capsules or tablets, presence of alcohol in some oral solution or bitter aroma...). Beside these official data, many studies have been published but must be carefully interpreted according to their level of pertinence. Meta-analysis gather all randomised controlled trials published or not, analyse their specific pertinence and thus provide clinically relevant elements. Randomised controlled trials present clinical interest but key-points in study design must be checked (e.g. number of patients, inclusion and exclusion criteria, length of the study and clinical relevance of clinical scales...). Other studies like open trials or clinical cases do not offersufficient guarantees. Some randomised controlled trials of clinical relevance have been carried out in this population with new pharmacological classes (eg SSRI, atypical antipsychotic drugs) and may lead to extended indications in children and adolescents. According to bibliographic and official data, the main criteria in the prescribing choice may take into consideration the following sis stressing a poor benefit/risk ratio. SSRI may offer better prospects but their use has not been approved in this indication, until now. In OCD, sertraline shows great interest to enhance clinical response and represents the molecule of reference. No drug has been approved for mood disorders in children or adolescent, in France, contrary to USA where lithium can be administered over the age of 12 years. In addition, antiepileptic drugs like carbamazepine or divalproate have conducted to clinical improvement in some studies. Benzodiazepines, hydroxyzine and meprobamate use should be strictly restricted in case of anxiety symptoms but are the only agents approved in this indication despise promising results obtained with SSRI. Transitory insomnia may take advantage of alimemazine prescription (approved use over the age of 36 months). Some typical neuroleptics are indicated in tics or in behaviour disorders associated to autism or related syndromes but present clinical limitations and poor tolerability. Promising clinical trials (randomised or not) have been conducted with new atypical antipsychotic drugs like risperidone. In conclusion, present data available for paediatric use of psychotropic agents emphasizes that safety and effectiveness are not always well established in particular for the treatment of chronic disorders (long term tolerability assessment). Moreover, studies should be carried out to specify factors promoting adherence and quality of life for this young population in order to optimise clinical benefit of drug prescription.

[Quality assurance in drug treatment by prescription drug analysis in a psychiatric treatment facility]. / Démarche qualité dans le circuit médicament grâce à l'analyse pharmaceutique des ordonnances dans un établissement de soins psychiatriques.

This article reports pharmaceutical analysis of the medical prescription in a psychiatric hospital. This study estimates the impact of the pharmaceutical interventions on the security of the treatment prescribed. This pharmaceutical system is based on individual prescription and on pharmaceutical analysis of this document. This analysis consists in checking high dosage prescription, detecting drug interaction, omission or frank prescribing errors and providing pharmaceutical advice to the physicians. In 1997, hospital pharmacists have intervened in 510 prescriptions:--315 high prescribing dosages were checked. In 7.3 percent of these cases, an error of dosage was detected;--66 drug interactions were communicated. Thirteen interventions corresponded to a forbidden association according to the Vidal therapeutic register;--53 pharmaceutical advices were performed; 12 interventions were related to a physiological or a pathological characteristic of the patient which forbid the use of the treatment;--more over, 34 omissions or frank errors were detected through the medium of our interventions; 25 errors could be considered as clinically relevant. In conclusion, the interventions rate was estimated to 3.6% of the new prescriptions. In 14.1% of these cases, they appeared as clinically significant. These rates are lower than those described in the traditional global distribution for which pharmaceutical analysis is not performed. This report has underlined the interest of pharmaceutical care by analysing the medical prescriptions.

Whole saliva and plasma levels of clozapine and desmethylclozapine.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine as an aid in the treatment of schizophrenic states is commonly used in our hospital. OBJECTIVE: Development of a high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of clozapine (CLZ) and its major metabolite desmethylclozapine (DMCLZ) in plasma and saliva, and investigation of the relationship between plasma concentrations of CLZ and DMCLZ and concentrations in saliva in patients treated with clozapine. METHODS: Subjects were either inpatients or outpatients with a DSM IV diagnosis of schizophrenia (n=34). Determination of CLZ and DMCLZ saliva concentrations appeared to be a satisfactory method to check compliance to treatment, particularly in outpatients. RESULTS: Mean CLZ and DMCLZ plasma concentrations were 432+/-264 ng/ml (+/-SD) (range 90-1310 ng/ml) and 257+/-144 ng/ml (range 55-580 ng/ ml), respectively. The CLZ/DMCLZ plasma ratio was equal to 1.7+/-0-5 (daily dosage 7.2+/-2.3 mg/kg, n=34). Mean CLZ plasma and saliva levels were 336+/-157 ng/ ml (range 90-580 ng/ml) and 159+/-86 ng/ml (range 40-364ng/ml), respectively (r=0.56, n=14). Mean DMCLZ plasma and saliva levels were 196+/-112 ng/ ml (range 55-481 ng/ml) and 109+/-67ng/ml (range 40-250ng/ml), respectively (r=0.73, n=14). Mean CLZ/DMCLZ ratios determined in plasma and saliva were 1.9+/-0.6 (range 1.0-3.4) and 1.7+/-0.6 (range 1.0-3.2), respectively (r=0.85, n=14). CLZ and DMCLZ saliva concentrations appear to be useful for checking compliance to treatment, in particular among outpatients.