A phase II randomised, placebo-controlled trial of low dose (metronomic) cyclophosphamide and nintedanib (BIBF1120) in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the safety and efficacy of a combination of the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, nintedanib (BIBF 1120) with oral cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with relapsed ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer received oral cyclophosphamide (100 mg o.d.) and were randomised (1,1) to also have either oral nintedanib or placebo. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), response rate, toxicity, and quality of life. RESULTS: 117 patients were randomised, 3 did not start trial treatment, median age 64 years. Forty-five (39%) had received ≥5 lines chemotherapy. 30% had received prior bevacizumab. The median OS was 6.8 (nintedanib) versus 6.4 (placebo) months (hazard ratio 1.08; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.62; P = 0.72). The 6-month PFS rate was 29.6% versus 22.8% (P = 0.57). Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 64% (nintedanib) versus 54% (placebo) of patients (P = 0.28); the most frequent G3/4 toxicities were lymphopenia (18.6% nintedanib versus 16.4% placebo), diarrhoea (13.6% versus 0%), neutropenia (11.9% versus 0%), fatigue (10.2% versus 9.1%), and vomiting (10.2% versus 7.3%). Patients who had received prior bevacizumab treatment had 52 days less time on treatment (P < 0.01). 26 patients (23%) took oral cyclophosphamide for ≥6 months. There were no differences in quality of life between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest reported cohort of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer treated with oral cyclophosphamide. Nintedanib did not improve outcomes when added to oral cyclophosphamide. Although not significant, more patients than expected remained on treatment for ≥6 months. This may reflect a higher proportion of patients with more indolent disease or the higher dose of cyclophosphamide used. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.govNCT01610869.

Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled cardiovascular outcome trials.

The full licensing of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in the USA and Europe requires demonstration of cardiovascular (CV) safety with an upper boundary of harm of <30%. We report a total of 3334 CV events during 86,716 person-years of follow-up in 36,543 patients, when combining data from three trials with formal and prospectively assessed endpoints. Fixed-effect meta-analysis showed that, compared with placebo, DPP-4 inhibition did not increase the upper boundary of risk for the composite endpoint, nor for any individual component by >30%. Relative risks (RRs) were: 0.99 [confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.06] for composite CV-specific death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and non-fatal stroke; 1.01 (CI 0.91-1.12) for CV-specific death; 0.98 (CI 0.89-1.09) for non-fatal MI; and 1.00 (CI 0.86-1.16) for non-fatal stroke. The risk of acute pancreatitis was increased (RR 1.79; CI 1.13-2.81), equating to 5.5 extra cases/10,000 patients/year (weighted mean) and a number needed to harm of 1940/year. These data provide reassurance about the safety of DPP-4 inhibitors with regard to individual atherothrombotic events and a safety signal for pancreatitis.