Prospective Deployment of Deep Learning Reconstruction Facilitates Highly Accelerated Upper Abdominal MRI.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare a conventional T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) with SPectral Attenuated Inversion Recovery (SPAIR) fat saturation and a deep learning (DL)-reconstructed accelerated VIBE sequence with SPAIR fat saturation achieving a 50 % reduction in breath-hold duration (hereafter, VIBE-SPAIRDL) in terms of image quality and diagnostic confidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients referred for upper abdominal MRI from November 2023 to December 2023 at a single tertiary center. Patients underwent upper abdominal MRI with acquisition of non-contrast and gadobutrol-enhanced conventional VIBE-SPAIR (fourfold acceleration, acquisition time 16 s) and VIBE-SPAIRDL (sixfold acceleration, acquisition time 8 s) on a 1.5 T scanner. Image analysis was performed by four readers, evaluating homogeneity of fat suppression, perceived signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), edge sharpness, artifact level, lesion detectability and diagnostic confidence. A statistical power analysis for patient sample size estimation was performed. Image quality parameters were compared by a repeated measures analysis of variance, and interreader agreement was assessed using Fleiss' κ. RESULTS: Among 450 consecutive patients, 45 patients were evaluated (mean age, 60 years ± 15 [SD]; 27 men, 18 women). VIBE-SPAIRDL acquisition demonstrated superior SNR (P < 0.001), edge sharpness (P < 0.001), and reduced artifacts (P < 0.001) with substantial to almost perfect interreader agreement for non-contrast (κ: 0.70-0.91) and gadobutrol-enhanced MRI (κ: 0.68-0.87). No evidence of a difference was found between conventional VIBE-SPAIR and VIBE-SPAIRDL regarding homogeneity of fat suppression, lesion detectability, or diagnostic confidence (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Deep learning reconstruction of VIBE-SPAIR facilitated a reduction of breath-hold duration by half, while reducing artifacts and improving image quality. SUMMARY: Deep learning reconstruction of prospectively accelerated T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination for upper abdominal MRI enabled a 50 % reduction in breath-hold time with superior image quality. KEY RESULTS: 1) In a prospective analysis of 45 patients referred for upper abdominal MRI, accelerated deep learning (DL)-reconstructed VIBE images with spectral fat saturation (SPAIR) showed better overall image quality, with better perceived signal-to-noise ratio and less artifacts (all P < 0.001), despite a 50 % reduction in acquisition time compared to conventional VIBE. 2) No evidence of a difference was found between conventional VIBE-SPAIR and accelerated VIBE-SPAIRDL regarding lesion detectability or diagnostic confidence.

Evaluating ChatGPT-4V in chest CT diagnostics: a critical image interpretation assessment.

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT-4V in interpreting a set of four chest CT slices for each case of COVID-19, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and control cases, thereby evaluating its potential as an AI tool in radiological diagnostics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 60 CT scans from The Cancer Imaging Archive, covering COVID-19, NSCLC, and control cases were analyzed using ChatGPT-4V. A radiologist selected four CT slices from each scan for evaluation. ChatGPT-4V's interpretations were compared against the gold standard diagnoses and assessed by two radiologists. Statistical analyses focused on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), along with an examination of the impact of pathology location and lobe involvement. RESULTS: ChatGPT-4V showed an overall diagnostic accuracy of 56.76%. For NSCLC, sensitivity was 27.27% and specificity was 60.47%. In COVID-19 detection, sensitivity was 13.64% and specificity of 64.29%. For control cases, the sensitivity was 31.82%, with a specificity of 95.24%. The highest sensitivity (83.33%) was observed in cases involving all lung lobes. The chi-squared statistical analysis indicated significant differences in Sensitivity across categories and in relation to the location and lobar involvement of pathologies. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT-4V demonstrated variable diagnostic performance in chest CT interpretation, with notable proficiency in specific scenarios. This underscores the challenges of cross-modal AI models like ChatGPT-4V in radiology, pointing toward significant areas for improvement to ensure dependability. The study emphasizes the importance of enhancing these models for broader, more reliable medical use.

COVID-19-related posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: insights from a clinical case.

In the present case report, a 50-year-old female presented with hemiparesis and blurred vision and was subsequently diagnosed with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Magnetic resonance imaging revealed cortico-subcortical edema with hyperintensities bilaterally in the frontoparietal and bi-occipital regions. Although PRES is a neurotoxic disorder that typically affects white matter of the brain and often is associated with hypertension, renal failure, and autoimmune disorders, recent studies have suggested that COVID-19 increases the risk of PRES. This case report presents a unique instance of COVID-19-related PRES. Unlike most previously reported cases occurring during the acute phase of severe COVID-19, our patient experienced PRES during the recovery phase with mild initial symptoms, such as fatigue and mild fever. The article discusses the pathophysiology of PRES, the potential mechanisms by which COVID-19 leads to PRES, and the treatment and outcome of the patient.

Novel Deep Learning Denoising Enhances Image Quality and Lowers Radiation Exposure in Interventional Bronchial Artery Embolization Cone Beam CT.

OBJECTIVES: In interventional bronchial artery embolization (BAE), periprocedural cone beam CT (CBCT) improves guiding and localization. However, a trade-off exists between 6-second runs (high radiation dose and motion artifacts, but low noise) and 3-second runs (vice versa). This study aimed to determine the efficacy of an advanced deep learning denoising (DLD) technique in mitigating the trade-offs related to radiation dose and image quality during interventional BAE CBCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included BMI-matched patients undergoing 6-second and 3-second BAE CBCT scans. The dose-area product values (DAP) were obtained. All datasets were reconstructed using standard weighted filtered back projection (OR) and a novel DLD software. Objective image metrics were derived from place-consistent regions of interest, including CT numbers of the Aorta and lung, noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio. Three blinded radiologists performed subjective assessments regarding image quality, sharpness, contrast, and motion artifacts on all dataset combinations in a forced-choice setup (-1 = inferior, 0 = equal; 1 = superior). The points were averaged per item for a total score. Statistical analysis ensued using a properly corrected mixed-effects model with post hoc pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: Sixty patients were assessed in 30 matched pairs (age 64 ± 15 years; 10 female). The mean DAP for the 6 s and 3 s runs was 2199 ± 185 µGym² and 1227 ± 90 µGym², respectively. Neither low-dose imaging nor the reconstruction method introduced a significant HU shift (p ≥ 0.127). The 3 s-DLD presented the least noise and superior contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) (p < 0.001). While subjective evaluation revealed no noticeable distinction between 6 s-DLD and 3 s-DLD in terms of quality (p ≥ 0.996), both outperformed the OR variants (p < 0.001). The 3 s datasets exhibited fewer motion artifacts than the 6 s datasets (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DLD effectively mitigates the trade-off between radiation dose, image noise, and motion artifact burden in regular reconstructed BAE CBCT by enabling diagnostic scans with low radiation exposure and inherently low motion artifact burden at short examination times.

Effects of adhesion barrier gel on functional outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation surgery; A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) is persistent pain and disability following lumbar laminectomy which is associated with decreased quality of life and disability and has been reported in up to 40% of the patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy. Several approaches have been introduced to reduce the rate of the FBSS. Among these, applying anti-adhesive barrier gels have been studied with interest with controversial results. The aim of the current study was to determine the effects of anti-adhesive barrier gels on functional outcome and recurrence of patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery. We searched databases including EMBASE, PUBMED, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and scholar databases until November 2019. To assess the heterogeneity across included studies was used Cochran's Q and I-square (I2) statistics. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI between were used to estimate pooled effect sizes. Out of 4507, 10 clinical trials found to be appropriate for current meta-analysis. The pooled results of included clinical trials indicated that adhesion barrier gel significantly decreased leg pain (LP) (SMD = -0.31; 95% CI, -0.60, -0.03; P = 0.032; I2: 59.2%) among patients with lumbar disc herniation surgery. Back pain (BP) (SMD = -0.03; 95% CI, -0.23, 0.16; P = 0.734; I2: 40.2%), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) (SMD = -0.11; 95% CI, -0.27, 0.05; P = 0.178; I2: 0.0%), were not significantly affected following adhesion barrier gel application. Application of adhesion barrier gel in single level lumbar disc surgery is associated with deceased leg pain. However, its application does not affect the low back pain, disability and gate. Further, larger randomized clinical trials are required.