Patients Satisfaction and Nasal Morphologic Change after Orthognathic Surgery.

Background: Patients' attitudes about their nose changes after orthognathic surgeries. We aimed to evaluate the patient's opinion about nasal change and morphologic changes following orthognathic surgery. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. The sample was derived from the population of patients who underwent orthognathic surgery in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran between 2017 and 2019. Subjects who underwent orthognathic surgery were studied. Subjects filled a modified nose evaluation form before and nine months after orthognathic surgery. For objective assessment, the nasolabial angle, nasofrontal angle, nasofacial angle, tip projection, and tip deviation and alar width were evaluated. Sixty-two patients were studied. Results: Forty (64.5%) patients did not absolutely like their nose before orthognathic surgeries, two (3.2 %) expressed a little satisfaction, 17(27.4%) answered they liked more or less, and three liked very much. Nine months after orthognathic surgeries, 4 (6.5%) patients did not like their nose, nine patients (14.5%) liked a little, 30 (48.4%) liked more or less, and 19 liked very much. Analysis of the data demonstrated a significant difference in patients' satisfaction with their noses before and nine months after orthognathic surgeries (P<0.001). Patients' satisfaction nine months after orthognathic surgery was not affected by nasal morphologic changes. Conclusion: It seems, patients' satisfaction with their nose improved after orthognathic surgeries. Patients' attitude was not associated with nasal morphologic changes.

Comparison of three antibiotic protocols for prevention of infection in dental implant surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

SUMMERY: This study aimed to compare the rate of post-surgical infection following single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis with or without post-surgical antibiotics versus post-surgical administration of antibiotics alone. The study consisted of three groups; Group 1 received single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis orally (2 g amoxicillin 1 h before surgery). Group 2 received one dose of prophylactic antibiotic (2 g amoxicillin 1 h before surgery) with additional doses after surgery (500 mg amoxicillin, q8h for 5 days). Group 3 received post-surgical antibiotics alone (500 mg amoxicillin, q8h for 5 days). 450 patients were enrolled. Post-surgical infection was seen in 9 patients of group 1, 11 patients of group 2, and 7 patients of group 3. There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative infection among the study groups (p value = 0.62). The number of failed implants was 2 in group 2, and 1 in group 3. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in infection rates among the three groups regarding concomitant guided bone regeneration. However, there was a significant difference in the rate of post-surgical infection between smokers and non-smokers (p < 0.001). Within the limitations of the study, it seems that a single preoperative dose of antibiotics is sufficient for reducing surgical site infections, adequately and should be preferred after implant placement whenever appropriate.

Use of Leukocyte-PlateletRich Fibrin in Conservative Management of Odontogenic Keratocyst: A Case Report.

A 29-year-old female patient was referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Taleghani Hospital of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran, in 2019, complaining of increased volume and pain in the posterior mandibular region. Cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography were performed, and an incisional biopsy was done. The histopathologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of Odontogenic Keratocyst (OKC). Surgical treatment was performed with marsupialization. After a year of follow-up, the resultant small-sized cyst was curetted, and Leukocyte-PlateletRich Fibrin (LPRF) was placed in the bony depression. The significant healing of the lesion was noted on regular follow-up visits with complete resolution at 15 months. This report showed that the application of LPRF might accelerate the healing of soft tissues and bone regeneration with no inhibitory effect on the natural healing process.