ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The susceptibility of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) to fracture is mainly associated with the loss of tooth structure. This study evaluated the effect of the access cavity design and taper preparation of root canals on ETT fracture resistance of maxillary molars. METHODS: For tapering assessment, 30 sound distobuccal roots of maxillary molars were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups (n = 10): a .04 taper, a .06 taper, or a .08 taper. Endodontic canal preparations were performed using the Twisted Files rotary system (Kerr Co, Glendora, CA). In addition, 48 intact maxillary first and second molars were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups (n = 16) for cavity preparation approaches: intact teeth, traditional access cavity (TAC), or conservative access cavity (CAC). Fracture resistance was tested using a universal testing machine. For statistical analysis, the level of significance was P ≤ .05. RESULTS: The .04 taper instrumentation had the highest fracture resistance (259.61 ± 52.06), and the .08 taper had the lowest (168.43 ± 59.63). The .04 and .06 groups did not differ significantly (P > .05); however, these groups differed significantly from the .08 group (P ≤ .05). Regarding the cavity preparation approaches, the 3 groups of intact teeth, CAC, and TAC showed fracture resistance mean values of 2118.85 ± 336.97, 1705.69 ± 591.51, and 1471.11 ± 435.34, respectively, with no significant difference between the CAC and TAC groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the taper of the root canal preparation can reduce fracture resistance. Moreover, access cavity preparation can reduce resistance; however, CAC in comparison with TAC had no significant impact.
Subject(s)
Dental Cavity Preparation/methods , Root Canal Preparation/methods , Tooth Fractures/prevention & control , Humans , Maxilla , MolarABSTRACT
Background: Splinting of teeth is performed for effective distribution of loads in mobile teeth and to lower the stress applied to compromised teeth. Biomechanics cannot adequately explain load distribution around natural teeth. This study aimed to compare the distribution pattern and magnitude of stress and strain around splinted and non-splinted teeth with compromised periodontium using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA). Methods: Six mandibular anterior teeth were scanned and data were registered in CATIA® and then SolidWorks® software programs. The jawbone was also designed. In the second model, the teeth were splinted with fiber-reinforced composite (FRC). The models were then transferred to ANSYS® software program and after meshing and fixing, 100- and 200-N loads were applied at zero and 30° angles. The magnitude and distribution of stress and strain in the periodontal ligament (PDL) and the surrounding cortical bone were determined. Results: A significant reduction in stress was noted in cortical bone around central and lateral incisors while an increase in stress was noted around the canine tooth after splinting. All these changes were more significant under 100-N load compared to 200-N load and greater differences were noted in response to the application of oblique loads compared to vertical loads. Conclusion: Splinting decreased the magnitude of stress and strain in teeth close to the center of splint and increased the stress and strain in teeth far from the center of splint. Adequate bone support of canine teeth must be ensured prior to selection of splinting as the treatment plan for the anterior mandible since it increases the longevity of all the teeth.
ABSTRACT
Short implants can be used as alternatives to standard implants to prevent invasive surgical procedures. However, due to concerns about complications caused by less bone-implant contact area, researchers have focused on biomechanical properties of short implants and methods to promote them. Splinting has been suggested to decrease the limitation of short implants. This study compared the pattern of stress and strain distribution in bone supporting splinted standard and short implants positioned at crestal and subcrestal levels. An edentulous posterior mandible was made using computer-aided design. Five models of different combinations of splinted short (4 × 6 mm) and standard (4 × 10 mm) implants placed at the level of crestal bone or subcrestally mesial and distal to the edentulous region with a pontic between them were designed using the CATIA software program. ANSYS software was used for finite element analysis (FEA). In each model, 100 and 300 N loads at zero (parallel to the long axis of implants) and 30° angles were applied to implants. Maximum stress and strain for each of the five models, including equivalent stress, shear stress, and strain in peri-implant cortical and cancellous bone, were calculated and stress distribution pattern in different models were recorded. The highest stress was caused by the 300 N load applied at a 30° angle, followed by the 300 N load applied axially and the 100 N load applied at 30°. This order changed in model 1, where the highest stress was noted under the 300 N load at 30°, followed by the 100 N load at 30°. Maximum stress in peri-implant bone occurred under oblique (30°) load. Maximum stress was noted when two splinted short implants were placed subcrestally. In addition, stress in bone around crestal-level splinted short implants was lower than that around standard implants. Combination of short and standard implants had no biomechanical advantage. Application of load parallel to the long axis can significantly decrease stress in peri-implant bone. Although the combination of short and standard implants has no biomechanical advantage, crestal-level placement of splinted short implants is a suitable treatment plan.
