Axillary irradiation omitting axillary dissection in breast cancer: is there a role for shoulder-sparing proton therapy?

The recent EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial showed that axillary radiotherapy and axillary lymph node dissection provide comparable local control and reduced lymphoedema in the irradiated group. However, no significant differences between the two groups in range of motion and quality of life were reported. It has been acknowledged that axillary irradiation could have induced some toxicity, particularly shoulder function impairment. In fact, conventional breast irradiation by tangential beams has to be modified to achieve full-dose coverage of the axillary nodes, including in the treatment field a larger portion of the shoulder structures. In this scenario, alternative irradiation techniques were discussed. Compared with modern photon techniques, axillary irradiation by proton therapy has the potential for sparing the shoulder without detrimental increase of the medium-to-low doses to the other normal tissues.

Bi-tangential hybrid IMRT for sparing the shoulder in whole breast irradiation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A bi-tangential technique is proposed to reduce undesired doses to the shoulder produced by standard tangential irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 6 patients affected by shoulder pain and reduced functional capacity after whole-breast irradiation were retrospectively analysed. The standard tangential plan used for treatment was compared with (1) a single bi-tangential plan where, to spare the shoulder, the lateral open tangent was split into two half-beams at isocentre, with the superior portion rotated by 10-20° medially with respect to the standard lateral beam; (2) a double bi-tangential plan, where both the tangential open beams were split. The planning target volume (PTV) coverage and the dose to the portion of muscles and axilla included in the standard tangential beams were compared. RESULTS: PTV95 % of standard plan (91.9 ± 3.8) was not significantly different from single bi-tangential plan (91.8 ± 3.4); a small but significant (p < 0.01) decrease was observed with the double bi-tangential plan (90.1 ± 3.7). A marked dose reduction to the muscle was produced by the single bi-tangential plan around 30-40 Gy. The application of the double bi-tangential technique further reduced the volume receiving around 20 Gy, but did not markedly affect the higher doses. The dose to the axilla was reduced both in the single and the double bi-tangential plans. CONCLUSION: The single bi-tangential technique would have been able to reduce the dose to shoulder and axilla, without compromising target coverage. This simple technique is valuable for irradiation after axillary lymph node dissection or in patients without dissection due to negative or low-volume sentinel lymph node disease.

Phase II study of preoperative irradiation and chemotherapy with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy has demonstrated to improve resectability and local control in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). 5-fluorouracil (5FU) has traditionally been the drug of choice in combination with radiation therapy. Early studies of capecitabine (CAP) have shown its potential to replace 5FU. Between March 2002 and April 2005, 31 patients with newly diagnosed LARC (T2 N+ 2 cases, T3 N0-N+ 25 cases, T4 N0-N+ 4 cases) received the combined treatment. Surgery was planned 6-8 weeks after chemoradiation. Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5FU plus leucovorin for 6 courses was given in pN+ patients. All patients completed the planned treatment. Grade 3 acute toxicity was observed in 5 patients (16%). Nineteen patients (61%) had a downstaging. A complete pathological remission was observed in 3 cases (10%). Median follow-up is of 23 months (range; 6-36 months). The results of this experience confirm the data of the literature about the feasibility and efficacy of a neoadjuvant treatment with radiation and CAP in LARC.